[my fault - sent again, this time to xen-devel] Jeremy, In testing the 2.6.27-rc6 kernel, I at one point neglected to enable SMP, and encountered the same issue as described in the following thread http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/31/115 (to which you replied with a hint toward a confirmed workaround). I don''t have any issues running a SMP kernel; just wondering whether a) it''s easily fixed or b) if UP should be avoided? Do you need more debug information? Also, though it may belong in a separate thread, how is the dom0 work coming along? I noticed your initial round of patches - many thanks for your efforts! If you need specific things tested, etc., I''m quite certain that many here would be willing to assist should you have a laundry list of things that need attention. Thanks, Steven Maresca _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-Sep-18 18:02 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Paravirt-ops UP bug, status check
steven maresca wrote:> In testing the 2.6.27-rc6 kernel, I at one point neglected to enable > SMP, and encountered the same issue as described in the following thread > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/31/115 (to which you replied with a hint > toward a confirmed workaround). > > I don''t have any issues running a SMP kernel; just wondering whether > a) it''s easily fixed or b) if UP should be avoided? Do you need more > debug information?The fix for this should already be in Linus''s git tree, or it will be soon. There''s no big downside to running an SMP kernel anyway though. J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel