Chris Lalancette
2008-Aug-14 09:54 UTC
[Xen-devel] [PATCH]: Expand Xen blkfront for > 16 xvd
Jeremy, Until recently, the maximum number of xvd block devices you could attach to a Xen domU was 16. This limitation turned out to be problematic for some users, so it was expanded to handle a much larger number of disks. However, this requires a couple of changes in the way that blkfront scans for disks. This functionality is already present in the Xen linux-2.6.18-xen.hg tree; the attached patch adds this functionality to the mainline xen-blkfront implementation. I successfully tested it on a 2.6.25 tree. I build tested it on 2.6.27-rc3, but couldn''t get that tree to boot due to some other bug. Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalance@redhat.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-Aug-18 17:16 UTC
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH]: Expand Xen blkfront for > 16 xvd
Chris Lalancette wrote:> Jeremy, > Until recently, the maximum number of xvd block devices you could attach to > a Xen domU was 16. This limitation turned out to be problematic for some users, > so it was expanded to handle a much larger number of disks. However, this > requires a couple of changes in the way that blkfront scans for disks. This > functionality is already present in the Xen linux-2.6.18-xen.hg tree; the > attached patch adds this functionality to the mainline xen-blkfront > implementation.I haven''t tested this yet. You have tested it OK with some pvops kernel? If so, send it to Jens Axboe with my ack.> I successfully tested it on a 2.6.25 tree. I build tested it > on 2.6.27-rc3, but couldn''t get that tree to boot due to some other bug.What other bug? J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Chris Lalancette
2008-Aug-19 06:52 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH]: Expand Xen blkfront for > 16 xvd
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:> Chris Lalancette wrote: >> Jeremy, >> Until recently, the maximum number of xvd block devices you could attach to >> a Xen domU was 16. This limitation turned out to be problematic for some users, >> so it was expanded to handle a much larger number of disks. However, this >> requires a couple of changes in the way that blkfront scans for disks. This >> functionality is already present in the Xen linux-2.6.18-xen.hg tree; the >> attached patch adds this functionality to the mainline xen-blkfront >> implementation. > > I haven''t tested this yet. You have tested it OK with some pvops > kernel? If so, send it to Jens Axboe with my ack.Yes, I tested it with a 2.6.25-something Fedora 9 pv-ops kernel (i386). I''ll send it along to Jens.> >> I successfully tested it on a 2.6.25 tree. I build tested it >> on 2.6.27-rc3, but couldn''t get that tree to boot due to some other bug. > > What other bug?This is http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459067, that I think you''ve already looked at. Basically any F-10 or upstream git kernel is crashing on an i386 RHEL-5 HV. We were a little confused by your comment in that bug, however; we were under the impression that the fix you mentioned was specifically a 32-on-64 fix, not for 32-on-32. If we were wrong, please point it out. Thanks, Chris Lalancette _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Chris Lalancette
2008-Aug-19 06:59 UTC
[Xen-devel] [PATCH]: Expand Xen blkfront for > 16 xvd
Until recently, the maximum number of xvd block devices you could attach to a Xen domU was 16. This limitation turned out to be problematic for some users, so it was expanded to handle a much larger number of disks. However, this requires a couple of changes in the way that blkfront scans for disks. This functionality is already present in the Xen linux-2.6.18-xen.hg tree; the attached patch adds this functionality to the mainline xen-blkfront implementation. I successfully tested it on a 2.6.25 tree. I build tested it on 2.6.27-rc3, but couldn''t get that tree to boot due to some other bug. Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalance@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel