John Levon
2008-Apr-08 12:30 UTC
[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] x86: Avoid use of domain_crash_synchronous() in C code.
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 02:01:40AM -0700, Xen patchbot-unstable wrote:> # HG changeset patch > # User Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@citrix.com> > # Date 1207322752 -3600 > # Node ID b7637c5269d133fc0828e76814e7f4333729caec > # Parent 271ec82db9218b42f5b04c94d41282e145343cc4 > x86: Avoid use of domain_crash_synchronous() in C code.Was this changeset supposed to include all the other IOREQ changes? Just checking they didn''t get in accidentally? regards john _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2008-Apr-08 12:32 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] x86: Avoid use of domain_crash_synchronous() in C code.
On 8/4/08 13:30, "John Levon" <levon@movementarian.org> wrote:> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 02:01:40AM -0700, Xen patchbot-unstable wrote: > >> # HG changeset patch >> # User Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@citrix.com> >> # Date 1207322752 -3600 >> # Node ID b7637c5269d133fc0828e76814e7f4333729caec >> # Parent 271ec82db9218b42f5b04c94d41282e145343cc4 >> x86: Avoid use of domain_crash_synchronous() in C code. > > Was this changeset supposed to include all the other IOREQ changes? Just > checking they didn''t get in accidentally?It was intended. Some of the d_c_s usages fell out when functions were cleaned up. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel