Li, Haicheng
2008-Jan-11 09:26 UTC
[Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #16702 & Xen0: #376 -- one new issue.
Hi all,
One new issue, as listed, is found in today''s testing, which is not a
regression, should be present for a long time.
New Issues:
=============================================1) XenU guest will hang if booted
just after destorying a HVM guest.
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1139
Old Issues:
=============================================1) [Guest Test] SMP VISTA HVM guest
might be blue screen when doing
large I/O in dom0.
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1117
2) HVM domain performance would downgrade, after doing save/restore.
3) FC7/FC8 guest continuously pops up error information.
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1136
Testing Environments:
=============================================PAE
CPU : Xeon(r) Processor 7000 series
Dom0 OS : Fedora6
Memory size : 8G
IA32e
CPU : Xeon(r) processor 5300 series
Dom0 OS : RHEL4u3
Memory size : 8G
VTD(PAE)
Service OS : RHEL5
Platform : Core 2 Duo with vt-d supported
Dom0 S3
Service OS : RHEL5.1
Platform : Core 2 Duo
Details: (The failed cases can get pass by manually retesting)
=============================================Platform : PAE
Service OS : Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
Hardware : Paxville
Xen package: 16702:850ec55df0dc
Date: Fri Jan 11 11:44:26 CST 2008
1. 2 PAE SMP VMX domains and 2 xenU domains coexist FAIL
2. one PAE SMP Linux VMX domain with memory 4G PASS
3. Live migration PASS
4. boot a pae on x86_64 xenU PASS
5. boot 4 VMX per processor at the same time PASS
6. boot up 1 winXP VMX and 1 linux PAE VMX PASS
7. Save and Restore PASS
8. Single domain with single vcpu bind a CPU PASS
9. one PAE SMP Linux VMX domain with memory 1500M PASS
10. boot up two winXP per processor at the same time PASS
11. boot up one linux VMX with 4 vcpus PASS
12. boot up four linux VMX one by one PASS
13. boot up VMX with acpi=1, vcpu=1 PASS
14. subset LTP test in RHEL4U2 PAE SMP VMX domain PASS
15. boot up the winxp image with vcpus=1 and acpi=1 PASS
16. boot up the vista image with vcpus=1 PASS
17. one IA32 UP ACPI Windows 2K3 VMX domain PASS
18. Boot Linux 2.6.23 base kernel in RHEL4U1 PAE SMP Linux VMX domain PASS
19. one IA32 SMP ACPI Windows 2K3 VMX domain PASS
20. one IA32 SMP ACPI Windows 2K VMX domain FAIL
21. one IA32 UP ACPI Windows 2K VMX domain PASS
22. one IA32 SMP ACPI Windows XP VMX domain PASS
23. one IA32 UP NOACPI Windows 2K VMX domain PASS
24. one IA32 UP NOACPI Windows 2K3 VMX domain PASS
25. one IA32 UP NOACPI Windows XP VMX domain PASS
26. kernel build in one linux VMX PASS
27. VBD and VNIF works on UP VMX domain PASS
28. VBD and VNIF works on SMP VMX domain FAIL
29. startx in dom0 PASS
30. boot up one IA32 RHEL5u1 VMX domain. PASS
31. reboot Windows xp after it boot up. PASS
32. reboot Fedora core 6 after it boot up. PASS
33. assign one pcie nic to one UP Linux guest with vtd. PASS
34. assign one pcie nic to one SMP Linux guest with vtd. PASS
35. assign one pcie nic to one UP WinXP guest with vtd. PASS
36. assign one pci nic to one SMP Linux guest with vtd. PASS
37. assign one pci nic to one UP WinXP guest with vtd. PASS
38. assign one pci nic to one UP Linux guest with vtd PASS
39. scp a big file in Linux guest via the pci nic assigned with vt-d. PASS
40. assign one pcie nic to one SMP WinXP guest with vtd. PASS
41. assign one pci nic to one SMP WinXP guest with vtd. PASS
42. scp a big file in Linux guest via the pcie nic assigned with vt-d. PASS
Platform : PAE
Service OS : Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
Hardware : Paxville
Xen package: 16702:850ec55df0dc
Date: Fri Jan 11 11:44:26 CST 2008
Summary Test Report of Last Session
====================================================================
Total Pass Fail NoResult Crash
====================================================================device_model
2 1 1 0 0
control_panel 12 11 1 0 0
Restart 1 1 0 0 0
gtest 18 17 1 0 0
====================================================================device_model
2 1 1 0 0
:pv_on_up_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:pv_on_smp_PAE_gPAE 1 0 1 0 0
control_panel 12 11 1 0 0
:XEN_4G_guest_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_four_vmx_xenu_seq_P 1 0 1 0 0
:XEN_LM_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_four_dguest_co_PAE_ 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_linux_win_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_SR_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_vmx_vcpu_pin_PAE_gP 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_1500M_guest_PAE_gPA 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_256M_guest_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_two_winxp_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_four_sguest_seq_PAE 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_vmx_4vcpu_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
Restart 1 1 0 0 0
:GuestPAE_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
gtest 18 17 1 0 0
:boot_up_acpi_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:ltp_nightly_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:reboot_xp_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_up_acpi_xp_PAE_gPA 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_up_vista_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_up_acpi_win2k3_PAE 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_smp_acpi_win2k3_PA 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_up_acpi_win2k_PAE_ 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_smp_acpi_win2k_PAE 1 0 1 0 0
:boot_smp_acpi_xp_PAE_gP 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_up_noacpi_win2k_PA 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_up_noacpi_win2k3_P 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_rhel5u1_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_base_kernel_PAE_gP 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_up_noacpi_xp_PAE_g 1 1 0 0 0
:bootx_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:reboot_fc6_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:kb_nightly_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
====================================================================Total
33 30 3 0 0
Platform : x86_64
Service OS : Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 3)
Hardware : Clovertown
Xen package: 16702:850ec55df0dc
Date: Fri Jan 11 12:40:42 CST 2008
1. 2 ia32e SMP VMX domains and 2 xenU domains coexist PASS
2. one ia32e SMP Linux VMX domain with memory 4G PASS
3. Live migration PASS
4. one xenU domain with memory 256M PASS
5. boot 4 VMX per processor at the same time PASS
6. boot up 1 winXP VMX and 1 linux VMX PASS
7. Save and Restore PASS
8. Single domain with single vcpu bind a CPU PASS
9. one FC5 ia32e SMP Linux VMX domain with memory 1500M PASS
10. boot up two winXP per processor at the same time PASS
11. boot up one linux VMX with 4 vcpus PASS
12. boot up four linux VMX one by one PASS
13. one pae SMP Linux VMX domain with memory 1500M PASS
14. one pae SMP Linux VMX domain with memory 4G PASS
15. one pae SMP Linux VMX domain with memory 256M PASS
16. Boot up VMX with acpi=1, vcpu=1 PASS
17. subset LTP test in RHEL4U2 ia32e SMP VMX domain PASS
18. boot up the winxp image with vcpus=1 and acpi=1 PASS
19. boot up the vista image with vcpus=1 PASS
20. one IA32E UP ACPI Windows 2K3 VMX domain PASS
21. boot Linux 2.6.23 base kernel in ia32e SMP Linux VMX domain PASS
22. one IA32E SMP ACPI Windows 2K3 VMX domain PASS
23. one IA32E SMP ACPI Windows 2K VMX domain PASS
24. one IA32E UP ACPI Windows 2K VMX domain PASS
25. one IA32E SMP ACPI Windows XP VMX domain PASS
26. one IA32E UP NOACPI Windows 2K VMX domain PASS
27. one IA32E UP NOACPI Windows 2K3 VMX domain PASS
28. one IA32E UP NOACPI Windows XP VMX domain PASS
29. kernel build in one ia32elinux VMX PASS
30. VBD and VNIF works on UP VMX domain PASS
31. VBD and VNIF works on SMP VMX domain PASS
32. startx in dom0 PASS
33. boot up one IA32E RHEL5u1 VMX domain. PASS
34. reboot Windows xp after it boot up. PASS
35. reboot Fedora core 6 after it boot up. PASS
36. assign one pcie nic to one UP Linux guest with vtd. PASS
37. assign one pcie nic to one SMP Linux guest with vtd. PASS
38. assign one pcie nic to one UP WinXP guest with vtd. PASS
39. assign one pci nic to one SMP Linux guest with vtd. PASS
40. assign one pci nic to one UP WinXP guest with vtd. PASS
41. assign one pci nic to one UP Linux guest with vtd PASS
42. scp a big file in Linux guest via the pci nic assigned with vt-d. PASS
43. assign one pcie nic to one SMP WinXP guest with vtd. PASS
44. assign one pci nic to one SMP WinXP guest with vtd. PASS
45. scp a big file in Linux guest via the pcie nic assigned with vt-d.
PASS
Platform : x86_64
Service OS : Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 3)
Hardware : Clovertown
Xen package: 16702:850ec55df0dc
Date: Fri Jan 11 12:40:42 CST 2008
Summary Test Report of Last Session
====================================================================
Total Pass Fail NoResult Crash
====================================================================vtd
10 10 0 0 0
device_model 2 2 0 0 0
control_panel 17 17 0 0 0
Restart 2 2 0 0 0
gtest 16 16 0 0 0
====================================================================vtd
10 10 0 0 0
:one_pcie_smp_xp_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pci_smp_xp_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pcie_up_xp_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pcie_up_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pcie_scp_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pci_scp_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pci_up_xp_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pci_smp_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pcie_smp_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pci_up_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
device_model 2 2 0 0 0
:pv_on_smp_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:pv_on_up_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
control_panel 17 17 0 0 0
:XEN_1500M_guest_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_256M_xenu_64_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_vmx_4vcpu_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_1500M_guest_64_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_4G_guest_64_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_256M_guest_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_SR_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_four_sguest_seq_64_ 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_vmx_vcpu_pin_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_linux_win_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_256M_guest_64_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_LM_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_two_winxp_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_four_vmx_xenu_seq_6 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_four_sguest_seq_64_ 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_4G_guest_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:XEN_four_dguest_co_64_g 1 1 0 0 0
Restart 2 2 0 0 0
:Guest64_64_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
:GuestPAE_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
gtest 16 16 0 0 0
:boot_up_acpi_win2k3_64_ 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_smp_acpi_xp_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:bootx_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_smp_acpi_win2k_64_ 1 1 0 0 0
:reboot_xp_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_up_vista_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_up_noacpi_win2k_64 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_base_kernel_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_up_acpi_win2k_64_g 1 1 0 0 0
:reboot_fc6_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_up_acpi_xp_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_smp_acpi_win2k3_64 1 1 0 0 0
:ltp_nightly_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_rhel5u1_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:boot_up_acpi_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
:kb_nightly_64_g64 1 1 0 0 0
====================================================================Total
47 47 0 0 0
VTD IA32PAE:
Summary Test Report of Last Session
====================================================================
Total Pass Fail NoResult Crash
====================================================================vtd
10 10 0 0 0
====================================================================vtd
10 10 0 0 0
:one_pci_smp_xp_PAE 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pci_scp_PAE 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pcie_up_PAE 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pci_up_PAE 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pcie_smp_xp_PAE 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pci_smp_PAE 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pcie_up_xp_PAE 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pcie_scp_PAE 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pci_up_xp_PAE 1 1 0 0 0
:one_pcie_smp_PAE 1 1 0 0 0
====================================================================Total
10 10 0 0 0
-- haicheng
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2008-Jan-11 11:11 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #16702 & Xen0: #376 -- one new issue.
On 11/1/08 09:26, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@intel.com> wrote:> One new issue, as listed, is found in today''s testing, which is not a > regression, should be present for a long time. > > New Issues: > =============================================> 1) XenU guest will hang if booted just after destorying a HVM guest. > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1139Is there a new test you''ve added which triggers this? -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
You, Yongkang
2008-Jan-11 14:52 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #16702 & Xen0: #376 --one new issue.
On Friday, January 11, 2008 7:12 PM, "Keir Fraser" wrote:> On 11/1/08 09:26, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@intel.com> wrote: > >> One new issue, as listed, is found in today''s testing, which is not a >> regression, should be present for a long time. >> >> New Issues: >> =============================================>> 1) XenU guest will hang if booted just after destorying a HVM guest. >> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1139 > > Is there a new test you''ve added which triggers this? > > -- KeirNo, we do not add new case to trigger this. But locate it from the tricky testing result. We found some strange testing output that show there is often 1~2 cases failed in the totally 30+ auto testing. But when we redo the specail case or manualy retest, it always pass. So it puzzled us. Finally we found this failure would happen in a combination testing situation. Well, it seems not happen every time and not happen on all machines. Could this issue be reproduced in your machine? Best Regards, Yongkang You _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2008-Jan-11 16:08 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #16702 & Xen0: #376 --one new issue.
On 11/1/08 14:52, "You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@intel.com> wrote:>> Is there a new test you''ve added which triggers this? >> >> -- Keir > > No, we do not add new case to trigger this. But locate it from the tricky > testing result. We found some strange testing output that show there is often > 1~2 cases failed in the totally 30+ auto testing. But when we redo the specail > case or manualy retest, it always pass. So it puzzled us. Finally we found > this failure would happen in a combination testing situation. Well, it seems > not happen every time and not happen on all machines. > > Could this issue be reproduced in your machine?I haven''t tried and, since this is unlikely to be a 3.2 regression, I''m not likely to find the time before 3.2.0 ships. We''ll have to try to track this one down for 3.2.1. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel