http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/f63aba1b5387 We needed this to support older domU configs, and it''s a harmless fix, I think regards john _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2008-Jan-10 16:36 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Another candidate for pushing to 3.1-testing
It doesn''t apply. The 3.1-testing code is rather different and doesn''t, I think, suffer from this bug. -- Keir On 10/1/08 16:30, "John Levon" <levon@movementarian.org> wrote:> > http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/f63aba1b5387 > > We needed this to support older domU configs, and it''s a harmless fix, I > think > > regards > john > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
John Levon
2008-Jan-10 16:46 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Another candidate for pushing to 3.1-testing
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 04:36:03PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:> It doesn''t apply. The 3.1-testing code is rather different and doesn''t, I > think, suffer from this bug.Erk, sorry - you''re right. I failed to notice we''d backported this code and didn''t bring this fix. regards john _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel