Is there a particular reason why this isn''t masked off in cpuid for SVM, as it''s not (and probably shouldn''t be) handled? cheers, john _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
It should be masked off. Now fixed. -- Keir On 22/11/07 09:11, "John Levon" <levon@movementarian.org> wrote:> > Is there a particular reason why this isn''t masked off in cpuid for SVM, > as it''s not (and probably shouldn''t be) handled? > > cheers, > john > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:37:04AM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:> It should be masked off. Now fixed.Thanks. We''ll backport and check it fixes current Solaris under HVM. (Then maybe a patch for 3.1.3?) cheers john _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
On 22/11/07 11:29, "John Levon" <levon@movementarian.org> wrote:> On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:37:04AM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote: > >> It should be masked off. Now fixed. > > Thanks. We''ll backport and check it fixes current Solaris under HVM. > (Then maybe a patch for 3.1.3?) > > cheers > johnYes, I already queued it for 3.1.3 (pending seeing that it actually works okay in xen-unstable of course!). -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel