Pasi Kärkkäinen
2005-Dec-29 22:02 UTC
[Xen-devel] Xen 3.0.1 plans? xen-3.0-testing status?
Hi list!
What are the plans for xen 3.0.1 release? Is support for 2.6.14 (or even better,
2.6.15)
going to be added?
What''s the state of xen-3.0-testing? Is it working OK for you? Better
than 3.0.0 ? Please post your comments!
-- Pasi Kärkkäinen
^
. .
Linux
/ - \
Choice.of.the
.Next.Generation.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> What''s the state of xen-3.0-testing? Is it working OK for > you? Better than 3.0.0 ? Please post your comments!3.0-testing has a number of bug fixes in it over 3.0.0 -- it should definitely be used in preference to 3.0.0. It''s effectively a 3.0.0.x series.> What are the plans for xen 3.0.1 release? Is support for > 2.6.14 (or even better, 2.6.15) going to be added?If you want 2.6.14 you can use the xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6-xen.hg tree. This will be pulled into -unstable.hg soon. If you want the very latest bleeding edge 2.6.15-rc7, look at xenbits.xensource.com/ext/linux-2.6-merge.hg Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
James Harper
2005-Dec-29 23:22 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0.1 plans? xen-3.0-testing status?
> > What''s the state of xen-3.0-testing? Is it working OK for > > you? Better than 3.0.0 ? Please post your comments! > > 3.0-testing has a number of bug fixes in it over 3.0.0 -- it should > definitely be used in preference to 3.0.0. It''s effectively a 3.0.0.x > series.Ah the world of open source... where anything tagged ''stable'' probably shouldn''t be used because it is either a) too old, or b) too buggy. But we wouldn''t have it any other way. Maybe that memory leak which crashes my dom0 has been fixed... I''ll have to give -testing a go. James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
James Harper wrote:>>> What''s the state of xen-3.0-testing? Is it working OK for >>> you? Better than 3.0.0 ? Please post your comments! >> 3.0-testing has a number of bug fixes in it over 3.0.0 -- it should >> definitely be used in preference to 3.0.0. It''s effectively a 3.0.0.x >> series. > > Ah the world of open source... where anything tagged ''stable'' probably shouldn''t be used because it is either a) too old, or b) too buggy. > > But we wouldn''t have it any other way. > > Maybe that memory leak which crashes my dom0 has been fixed... I''ll have to give -testing a go. >3.0-testing is nice. There have not been many backports to it lately from -unstable. I know a patch I received from Ian that fixes issues with 3ware cards is not even on -unstable, I had hoped it''d be in 3.0-testing by now. I''m half-considering just running -unstable util 3.0.2/3 so I get the latest fixes :) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2005-Dec-30 10:16 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0.1 plans? xen-3.0-testing status?
On 30 Dec 2005, at 01:02, Matt Ayres wrote:> 3.0-testing is nice. There have not been many backports to it lately > from -unstable. I know a patch I received from Ian that fixes issues > with 3ware cards is not even on -unstable, I had hoped it''d be in > 3.0-testing by now.The fix has been in -unstable for a fortnight (changeset 8392 "Work aroudn swiotlb issue..."). -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser wrote:> > On 30 Dec 2005, at 01:02, Matt Ayres wrote: > >> 3.0-testing is nice. There have not been many backports to it lately >> from -unstable. I know a patch I received from Ian that fixes issues >> with 3ware cards is not even on -unstable, I had hoped it''d be in >> 3.0-testing by now. > > The fix has been in -unstable for a fortnight (changeset 8392 "Work > aroudn swiotlb issue..."). >Thank you for the correction. I am on the changebot list, but seem to have missed that one. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Pasi Kärkkäinen
2006-Jan-03 14:57 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.0.1 plans? xen-3.0-testing status?
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 10:10:45PM -0000, Ian Pratt wrote:> > > What''s the state of xen-3.0-testing? Is it working OK for > > you? Better than 3.0.0 ? Please post your comments! > > 3.0-testing has a number of bug fixes in it over 3.0.0 -- it should > definitely be used in preference to 3.0.0. It''s effectively a 3.0.0.x series. >Yep. And most people seem to agree that 3.0-testing is currently more stable than 3.0.0 release.> > What are the plans for xen 3.0.1 release? Is support for > > 2.6.14 (or even better, 2.6.15) going to be added? > > If you want 2.6.14 you can use the xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6-xen.hg tree. > This will be pulled into -unstable.hg soon. > > If you want the very latest bleeding edge 2.6.15-rc7, look at xenbits.xensource.com/ext/linux-2.6-merge.hg >Now waiting for 2.6.15 final merge :) -- Pasi Kärkkäinen ^ . . Linux / - \ Choice.of.the .Next.Generation. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel