thr3ads.net - Xen devel - [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds [Aug 2005]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

David F Barrera

2005-Aug-22 18:32 UTC

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

August 19, 2005 using hg source as of:

changeset:   6315:531ad4bde8f249c318588f41bdbb72d0b0e0ea9c
tag:         tip
parent:      6314:473af43ac65b1a872b058469d01acc6cfa21505d
parent:      6313:d8fd24b4308078f6d20aa8a306e540c5833ca5a2
user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Mon Aug 22 05:21:18 2005
summary:     merge?

x86_32 (no PAE support)   

    * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 (512M RAM)
    * Builds and boots without problems
    * Able to create domU
    * Ran LTP on both dom0 and domU
    * No problems observed

    Last good changeset for x86_32, non-PAE:

    changeset:   6315:531ad4bde8f249c318588f41bdbb72d0b0e0ea9c
    tag:         tip
    parent:      6314:473af43ac65b1a872b058469d01acc6cfa21505d
    parent:      6313:d8fd24b4308078f6d20aa8a306e540c5833ca5a2
    user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
    date:        Mon Aug 22 05:21:18 2005
    summary:     merge?

x86_32 (PAE)

    * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, and IBM ThinkCentre
    * Dom0 boots without problems; however,
    * We are able to create DomUs ONLY when using *swiotlb=force* as a
      kernel parameter for dom0
    * Ran LTP on both Dom0 and DomU


    ISSUES:

        * DomU boot crashes Dom0, Bugzilla #168
              o Workaround: use swiotlb=force as a kernel parameter when
                booting dom0
              o DomU boots up normally if using swiotlb=forceX server
                will not come up on Dom0 on a FC3 box when Xen built
                with PAE ''on'', Bugzilla #137
        * Networking issue on FC3 when Xen built with PAE, Bugzilla #173
              o DomU unable to get dhcp address
              o tcpdump shows lots of networking activity being
''heard''
              o ping from external box shows corrupt packets
              o DomU has no trouble getting IP address when Xen built
                non-PAE, however


    Last good changeset for x86_32,  PAE:

    changeset:   6315:531ad4bde8f249c318588f41bdbb72d0b0e0ea9c
    tag:         tip
    parent:      6314:473af43ac65b1a872b058469d01acc6cfa21505d
    parent:      6313:d8fd24b4308078f6d20aa8a306e540c5833ca5a2
    user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
    date:        Mon Aug 22 05:21:18 2005
    summary:     merge?

x86_64

    SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades
    ISSUES:

        * Bugzilla #169 - x86_64 - Unable to handle kernel paging
          request at ffff8000003e0000 RIP:
          <ffffffff8015d16c>{unmap_vmas+1084} 
        * Bugzilla #176  - x86_64 - *UNABLE TO BOOT DOMU*
              o VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb2" or
unknown-block(0,0)
              o Please append a correct "root=" boot option
              o Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs
                on unknown-block(0,0)

    Last good changeset for x86_64:

    changeset: 6228:1a94949348ff52863b9fbef4eaf102c7e46a345d
    tag: tip
    user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
    date: Thu Aug 18 05:41:55 2005
    summary: Fix range_straddles_boundary() check to exclude regions that


-- Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. " Euripides



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Aug-23 19:20 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

August 23, 2005, using HG source as of:

changeset:   6329:3889ca17ff5867d5efa19eaf25463d59dd6c8c7d
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Tue Aug 23 07:30:35 2005
summary:     phys_to_machine_mapping array is not an array of longs.

x86_32 (no PAE support)   

        SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 (512M RAM) and FC3 on IBM
        ThinkCentre
        Builds with workaround* and boots without problems
        Able to create domU
        Ran LTP on both dom0 and domU
        No problems observed
        ISSUE: 
              * Build break on SLES 9 , Bugzilla #179
              * Missing -lcurses
              * *Workaround is to change LD_LIBS in
                tools/xenstat/xentop/Makefile to include -lncurses
                instead of -lcurses 
        
        Last good changeset for x86_32, non-PAE: *with workaround
        
        changeset:   6329:3889ca17ff5867d5efa19eaf25463d59dd6c8c7d
        tag:         tip
        user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Tue Aug 23 07:30:35 2005
        summary:     phys_to_machine_mapping array is not an array of
        longs.
        
        

x86_32 (PAE)

        SLES 9 SP2, FC3, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, and IBM ThinkCentre
        Dom0 boots without problems; however,
        We are able to create DomUs ONLY when using *swiotlb=force* as a
        kernel parameter for dom0
        Ran LTP on both Dom0 and DomU
        
        ISSUES:
        DomU boot crashes Dom0, Bugzilla #168 
              * Workaround: use swiotlb=force as a kernel parameter when
                booting dom0
              * DomU boots up normally if using swiotlb=forceX server
                will not come up on Dom0 on a FC3 box when Xen built
                with PAE ''on'', Bugzilla #137
        Networking issue on FC3 when Xen built with PAE, Bugzilla #173
              * DomU unable to get dhcp address
              * tcpdump shows lots of networking activity being
''heard''
              * ping from external box shows corrupt packets
              * DomU has no trouble getting IP address when Xen built
                non-PAE
        X server does not come up on FC3 box with PAE support, Bugzilla
        #137
              * X server comes up normally when xen built without PAE
                support
                
        Last good changeset for x86_32,  PAE:
        
        changeset:   6329:3889ca17ff5867d5efa19eaf25463d59dd6c8c7d
        tag:         tip
        user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Tue Aug 23 07:30:35 2005
        summary:     phys_to_machine_mapping array is not an array of
        longs.
        


x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

Problems when booting up DomU on x86_64 platforms (SLES 9 and FC4)

        ISSUES:
         
        Bugzilla #176  - x86_64 - *UNABLE TO BOOT DOMU*
              * VFS: Cannot open root device "sdb2" or unknown-block
                (0,0)
              * Please append a correct "root=" boot option
              * Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs
                on unknown-block(0,0)
              * 
        Bugzilla #169 - x86_64 - Unable to handle kernel paging request
        at ffff8000003e0000 RIP: <ffffffff8015d16c>{unmap_vmas+1084}
        
        Last good changeset for x86_64:
        
        changeset: 6228:1a94949348ff52863b9fbef4eaf102c7e46a345d
        tag: tip
        user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date: Thu Aug 18 05:41:55 2005
        Summary: Fix range_straddles_boundary() check to exclude regions
        that



-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Aug-25 19:17 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

August 25, 2005 using hg source as of:


changeset: 6401:98a6eb458c783cbbb8f19e5713a4ad8a1ea830c6
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Thu Aug 25 11:25:26 2005
summary: Memory management fixes. Page tables are created, buddy 
allocator now

x86_32 (no PAE support)

    * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 (512 RAM)
    * Builds and boots without problems
    * Able to create domU
    * Ran LTP on both dom0 and domU

ISSUES:

    * Investigating a ‘Kernel panic – not syncing: BUG!’ displayed on
      two test machines
    * RHEL 4 and SLES 9
    * No defect written on it, yet

Last good changeset for x86_32, non-PAE:

changeset: 6395:8d31f9a9c4232b8f9d0200d0a3d312170c197f63
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Thu Aug 25 08:27:10 2005
summary: Fix SMP booting: x86/64 startup initialisation fixes and so on.

x86_32 (PAE)

    * SLES 9 SP2, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335 and IBM ThinkCentre
    * Builds and boots without problems
    * Able to create domU
    * Ran LTP on both dom0 and domU

ISSUES:

    * Same issue described on the x86_32 (no PAE support) section

Last good changeset for x86_32 (PAE):

changeset: 6395:8d31f9a9c4232b8f9d0200d0a3d312170c197f63
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Thu Aug 25 08:27:10 2005
summary: Fix SMP booting: x86/64 startup initialisation fixes and so on.

x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

    * Changeset 6400 fixed a lot of previously reported problems
    * Dom0 builds and boots without problems now
    * Guests OSs can be created, but I am seeing them crash (below)

ISSUES:

    * DomU will crash after some activity
    * I can recreate reliably the crash
    * Bugzilla #190 - Kernel BUG at
"drivers/xen/blkfront/blkfront.c":95


Last good changesets for x86_64:

changeset: 6401:98a6eb458c783cbbb8f19e5713a4ad8a1ea830c6
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Thu Aug 25 11:25:26 2005
summary: Memory management fixes. Page tables are created, buddy 
allocator now

changeset: 6400:b88c5350de57a1fc18943cbb33fa72c348004fc8
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Thu Aug 25 11:21:19 2005
summary: This patch fixes Bugzilla #169. (It should fix #187 too -- Keir).


-- Regards,

David F Barrera

Linux Technology Center

Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. " Euripides



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Aug-26 19:24 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

August 26, 2005 using hg source as of:

changeset: 6451:2b95125015a59eeb086b3748f9415ac440133b4d
tag: tip
user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date: Fri Aug 26 08:06:49 2005
summary: Remove the unused ia64 patch directory.


x86_32 (no PAE support)

    * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 (512 RAM)
    * Builds and boots without problems
    * Able to create domU
    * Unable to complete LTP run on DomU


ISSUES:

    * DomU crashes when running LTP
    * Observed on SLES 9 SP2 and FC3 machine
    * Able to reliably recreate the crash
    * Bugzilla #190 - Kernel BUG at
"drivers/xen/blkfront/blkfront.c":95
          o Seeing this bug on x86_64, too
    * Bugzilla #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9 SP2 boxes
          o Not happening on FC4 box

Last good changeset for x86_32, non-PAE:

    changeset: 6329:3889ca17ff5867d5efa19eaf25463d59dd6c8c7d
    tag: tip
    user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk <mailto:kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk>
    date: Tue Aug 23 07:30:35 2005
    summary: phys_to_machine_mapping array is not an array of longs.


x86_32 (PAE)

    * SLES 9 SP2, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335 and IBM ThinkCentre
    * Builds and boots without problems
    * Able to create domUs
    * Ran LTP on both dom0 and domU successfully on xSeries 335 RHEL 4 box


ISSUES:

    * Same issues described on the x86_32 (no PAE support) section
          o Bugzilla #190 - Kernel BUG at
            "drivers/xen/blkfront/blkfront.c":95
          o Bugzilla #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9
            SP2 boxes


    Last good changeset for x86_32 (PAE):

    changeset: 6395:8d31f9a9c4232b8f9d0200d0a3d312170c197f63
    tag: tip
    user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
    date: Thu Aug 25 08:27:10 2005
    summary: Fix SMP booting: x86/64 startup initialisation fixes and so
    on.



x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

    * Built and booted properly
    * Guests OSs can be created, but I am seeing them crash (below)
    * Networking on DomU on SLES 9 SP2 boxes is broken


ISSUES:

    * Bugzilla #190 - Kernel BUG at
"drivers/xen/blkfront/blkfront.c":95
          o DomU will crash after some activity
          o I can recreate reliably the crash on the FC4 box
    * Bugzilla #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9 SP2 boxes
          o Not happening on FC4 box
          o 2 SLES 9 SP2 boxes affected
          o Kernels built with and without NETGRANT TX/RX option, same
            results

Last good changeset for x86_64:

    changeset: 6401:98a6eb458c783cbbb8f19e5713a4ad8a1ea830c6
    tag: tip
    user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
    date: Thu Aug 25 11:25:26 2005
    summary: Memory management fixes. Page tables are created, buddy
    allocator now



-- Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. " Euripides



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Nakajima, Jun

2005-Aug-26 19:36 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

David F Barrera wrote:> August 26, 2005 using hg source as of:
> 
> changeset: 6451:2b95125015a59eeb086b3748f9415ac440133b4d
> tag: tip
> user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
> date: Fri Aug 26 08:06:49 2005
> summary: Remove the unused ia64 patch directory.
> 
David, Hi

Recently our team is seeing booting problems with x86_32 (not x86_64)
_SMP_ dom0 on some machines. Did you try that on your machines? Do you
think it''s sensible to test SMP dom0 on your x86_32 PAE configurations?
> 
> x86_32 (no PAE support)
> 
>     * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 (512 RAM)
>     * Builds and boots without problems
>     * Able to create domU
>     * Unable to complete LTP run on DomU
> 
> 
> ISSUES:
> 
>     * DomU crashes when running LTP
>     * Observed on SLES 9 SP2 and FC3 machine
>     * Able to reliably recreate the crash
>     * Bugzilla #190 - Kernel BUG at
>           "drivers/xen/blkfront/blkfront.c":95 o Seeing this bug
on
>     x86_64, too * Bugzilla #192 - Networking broken on guest domain
>           in SLES 9 SP2 boxes o Not happening on FC4 box
> 
> Last good changeset for x86_32, non-PAE:
> 
>     changeset: 6329:3889ca17ff5867d5efa19eaf25463d59dd6c8c7d
>     tag: tip
>     user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
>     <mailto:kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk> date: Tue Aug 23 07:30:35
2005
>     summary: phys_to_machine_mapping array is not an array of longs.
> 
> 
> x86_32 (PAE)
> 
>     * SLES 9 SP2, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335 and IBM
> ThinkCentre 
>     * Builds and boots without problems
>     * Able to create domUs
>     * Ran LTP on both dom0 and domU successfully on xSeries 335 RHEL
> 4 box 
> 
> 
> ISSUES:
> 
>     * Same issues described on the x86_32 (no PAE support) section
>           o Bugzilla #190 - Kernel BUG at
>             "drivers/xen/blkfront/blkfront.c":95
>           o Bugzilla #192 - Networking broken on guest domain in SLES
>             9 SP2 boxes
> 
> 
>     Last good changeset for x86_32 (PAE):
> 
>     changeset: 6395:8d31f9a9c4232b8f9d0200d0a3d312170c197f63
>     tag: tip
>     user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
>     date: Thu Aug 25 08:27:10 2005
>     summary: Fix SMP booting: x86/64 startup initialisation fixes and
>     so on.
> 
> 
> 
> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
> 
>     * Built and booted properly
>     * Guests OSs can be created, but I am seeing them crash (below)
>     * Networking on DomU on SLES 9 SP2 boxes is broken
> 
> 
> ISSUES:
> 
>     * Bugzilla #190 - Kernel BUG at
>           "drivers/xen/blkfront/blkfront.c":95 o DomU will crash
>           after some activity o I can recreate reliably the crash on
>     the FC4 box * Bugzilla #192 - Networking broken on guest domain
>           in SLES 9 SP2 boxes o Not happening on FC4 box
>           o 2 SLES 9 SP2 boxes affected
>           o Kernels built with and without NETGRANT TX/RX option, same
>             results
> 
> Last good changeset for x86_64:
> 
>     changeset: 6401:98a6eb458c783cbbb8f19e5713a4ad8a1ea830c6
>     tag: tip
>     user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
>     date: Thu Aug 25 11:25:26 2005
>     summary: Memory management fixes. Page tables are created, buddy
>     allocator now
> 
> 
> 
> -- Regards,
> 
> David F Barrera
> Linux Technology Center
> Systems and Technology Group, IBM
> 
> "The wisest men follow their own direction. " Euripides
>  
Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Aug-26 20:28 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Nakajima, Jun wrote:
>David, Hi
>
>Recently our team is seeing booting problems with x86_32 (not x86_64)
>_SMP_ dom0 on some machines. Did you try that on your machines? Do you
>think it''s sensible to test SMP dom0 on your x86_32 PAE
configurations?
>  
>I''ll see if I can fit it into my schedule. I am extremely busy.

-- Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Aug-29 19:25 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

August 27, 2005 using hg source as of:

changeset:   6461:936be0ae823fd3a94ea06d92fdacad65b85d6014
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Mon Aug 29 09:53:38 2005
summary:     Fix page_is_ram() start-of-day checks, and the watch
routine


x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 (512 RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create domU
        * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0 and DomU
        
ISSUES:

        * None

Last good changeset for x86_32, non-PAE:

        changeset:   6461:936be0ae823fd3a94ea06d92fdacad65b85d6014
        tag:         tip
        user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Mon Aug 29 09:53:38 2005
        summary:     Fix page_is_ram() start-of-day checks, and the
        watch routine
   


x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335 and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create domUs**
        * Successfully ran LTP on both dom0s and domUs


ISSUES:

        ** #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9 SP2 boxes


        Last good changeset for x86_32 (PAE):
        
        changeset: 6395:8d31f9a9c4232b8f9d0200d0a3d312170c197f63
        tag: tip
        user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date: Thu Aug 25 08:27:10 2005
        summary: Fix SMP booting: x86/64 startup initialisation fixes
        and so


x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Built and booted properly
        * Guests OSs cannot be created
        
ISSUES:

        * Bugzilla #196 x86_64 - Unable to create guest domains

        Last good changeset for x86_64:
        
        changeset: 6401:98a6eb458c783cbbb8f19e5713a4ad8a1ea830c6
        tag: tip
        user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date: Thu Aug 25 11:25:26 2005
        summary: Memory management fixes. Page tables are created, buddy
        allocator now
        

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Aug-30 19:22 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

August 30, 2005 using hg source as of:

changeset:   6473:7296ed60874f2fb1af6d961512ab3d76d34c9ebf
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Tue Aug 30 09:14:31 2005
summary:     Fix user-space four- and five-argument hypercalls on

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create domU**
        * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0 and DomU
        
ISSUES:

        ** #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9 SP2 boxes
		* Affecting all SLES 9 platforms
		

Last good changeset for x86_32, non-PAE:

        changeset: 6395:8d31f9a9c4232b8f9d0200d0a3d312170c197f63
        tag: tip
        user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date: Thu Aug 25 08:27:10 2005
        summary: Fix SMP booting: x86/64 startup initialisation fixes
        and so on.
   


x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335 and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create domUs** 
        * Successfully ran LTP on both dom0s and domUs


ISSUES:

        ** #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9 SP2 boxes
	* xenconsole: Could not read tty from store: No such file or directory 


        Last good changeset for x86_32 (PAE):
        
        changeset: 6395:8d31f9a9c4232b8f9d0200d0a3d312170c197f63
        tag: tip
        user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date: Thu Aug 25 08:27:10 2005
        summary: Fix SMP booting: x86/64 startup initialisation fixes
        and so


x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create domUs** 
        * Successfully ran LTP on both dom0s and domUs
        
ISSUES:

        ** #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9 SP2 boxes

        Last good changeset for x86_64:
                
        changeset: 6401:98a6eb458c783cbbb8f19e5713a4ad8a1ea830c6
        tag: tip
        user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date: Thu Aug 25 11:25:26 2005
        summary: Memory management fixes. Page tables are created, buddy
        allocator now
        

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Anthony Liguori

2005-Aug-30 19:41 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

David F Barrera wrote:
>x86_32 (PAE)
>
>        * SLES 9 SP2, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335 and IBM
>        ThinkCentre
>        * Builds and boots without problems
>        * Able to create domUs** 
>        * Successfully ran LTP on both dom0s and domUs
>
>
>ISSUES:
>
>	* xenconsole: Could not read tty from store: No such file or directory 
>  
>Is this reproducible outside of PAE?
>        Last good changeset for x86_32 (PAE):
>        
>        changeset: 6395:8d31f9a9c4232b8f9d0200d0a3d312170c197f63
>        tag: tip
>        user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
>        date: Thu Aug 25 08:27:10 2005
>        summary: Fix SMP booting: x86/64 startup initialisation fixes
>        and so
>
>
>x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
>
>        * Builds and boots without problems
>        * Able to create domUs** 
>        * Successfully ran LTP on both dom0s and domUs
>        
>ISSUES:
>
>        ** #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9 SP2 boxes
>
>        Last good changeset for x86_64:
>                
>        changeset: 6401:98a6eb458c783cbbb8f19e5713a4ad8a1ea830c6
>        tag: tip
>        user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
>        date: Thu Aug 25 11:25:26 2005
>        summary: Memory management fixes. Page tables are created, buddy
>        allocator now
>        
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Nakajima, Jun

2005-Aug-30 19:54 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Anthony Liguori wrote:> David F Barrera wrote:
> 
>> x86_32 (PAE)
>> 
>>        * SLES 9 SP2, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335 and IBM   
>> ThinkCentre 
>>        * Builds and boots without problems
>>        * Able to create domUs**
>>        * Successfully ran LTP on both dom0s and domUs
>> 
>> 
>> ISSUES:
>> 
>> 	* xenconsole: Could not read tty from store: No such file or
>> directory 
>> 
>> 
> Is this reproducible outside of PAE?
I see this problem on x86_64. Please look at my emails.

Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Jerone Young

2005-Aug-30 19:55 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 14:22 -0500, David F Barrera
wrote:> August 30, 2005 using hg source as of:
> 
> changeset:   6473:7296ed60874f2fb1af6d961512ab3d76d34c9ebf
> tag:         tip
> user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
> date:        Tue Aug 30 09:14:31 2005
> summary:     Fix user-space four- and five-argument hypercalls on
> 
> x86_32 (no PAE support)
> 
>         * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
>         * Builds and boots without problems
>         * Able to create domU**
>         * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0 and DomU
>         
> ISSUES:
> 
>         ** #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9 SP2 boxes
> 		* Affecting all SLES 9 platforms
> 		
> 
> Last good changeset for x86_32, non-PAE:
> 
>         changeset: 6395:8d31f9a9c4232b8f9d0200d0a3d312170c197f63
>         tag: tip
>         user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
>         date: Thu Aug 25 08:27:10 2005
>         summary: Fix SMP booting: x86/64 startup initialisation fixes
>         and so on.
>    
> 
> 
> x86_32 (PAE)
> 
>         * SLES 9 SP2, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335 and IBM
>         ThinkCentre
>         * Builds and boots without problems
>         * Able to create domUs** 
>         * Successfully ran LTP on both dom0s and domUs
> 
> 
> ISSUES:
> 
>         ** #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9 SP2 boxes
> 	* xenconsole: Could not read tty from store: No such file or directoy
I''m using changeset 6477 and I am not seeing this with my PAE Xen box.
>  
> 
> 
>         Last good changeset for x86_32 (PAE):
>         
>         changeset: 6395:8d31f9a9c4232b8f9d0200d0a3d312170c197f63
>         tag: tip
>         user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
>         date: Thu Aug 25 08:27:10 2005
>         summary: Fix SMP booting: x86/64 startup initialisation fixes
>         and so
> 
> 
> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
> 
>         * Builds and boots without problems
>         * Able to create domUs** 
>         * Successfully ran LTP on both dom0s and domUs
>         
> ISSUES:
> 
>         ** #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9 SP2 boxes
> 
>         Last good changeset for x86_64:
>                 
>         changeset: 6401:98a6eb458c783cbbb8f19e5713a4ad8a1ea830c6
>         tag: tip
>         user: kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
>         date: Thu Aug 25 11:25:26 2005
>         summary: Memory management fixes. Page tables are created, buddy
>         allocator now
>         
> -- 
Jerone Young
IBM Linux Technology Center
jyoung5@us.ibm.com
512-838-1157 (T/L: 678-1157)


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Aug-30 20:38 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 12:54 -0700, Nakajima, Jun wrote:> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > David F Barrera wrote:
> > 
> >> x86_32 (PAE)
> >> 
> >>        * SLES 9 SP2, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335 and IBM
> >> ThinkCentre 
> >>        * Builds and boots without problems
> >>        * Able to create domUs**
> >>        * Successfully ran LTP on both dom0s and domUs
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ISSUES:
> >> 
> >> 	* xenconsole: Could not read tty from store: No such file or
> >> directory 
> >> 
> >> 
> > Is this reproducible outside of PAE?
> 
> I see this problem on x86_64. Please look at my emails.
I saw it on x86_64, too. Bugzilla #202.
> 
> Jun
> ---
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> -- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Aug-31 16:05 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

August 31, 2005 using hg source as of:

changeset:   6548:6d4c0bfc3c1c15d1871d17698bfd78a9ea05aff5
tag:         tip
user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Wed Aug 31 05:24:43 2005
summary:     Wait a little bit for tty to appear.


x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create domU**
        * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0s and DomUs
        
ISSUES:

        ** #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9 SP2 boxes
                * Affecting all of my SLES 9 platforms
                

Last good changeset for x86_32, non-PAE:

        changeset:   6548:6d4c0bfc3c1c15d1871d17698bfd78a9ea05aff5
        tag:         tip
        user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Wed Aug 31 05:24:43 2005
        summary:     Wait a little bit for tty to appear.
 

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335 and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create domUs** 
        * Successfully ran LTP on both dom0s and domUs


ISSUES:

        ** #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9 SP2 boxes
       

        Last good changeset for x86_32 (PAE):
        
        changeset:   6548:6d4c0bfc3c1c15d1871d17698bfd78a9ea05aff5
        tag:         tip
        user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Wed Aug 31 05:24:43 2005
        summary:     Wait a little bit for tty to appear.
        

x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create domUs** 
        * Successfully ran LTP on both dom0s and domUs
        
ISSUES:

        ** #192 – Networking broken on guest domain in SLES 9 SP2 boxes

        Last good changeset** for x86_64:
                
        changeset:   6548:6d4c0bfc3c1c15d1871d17698bfd78a9ea05aff5
        tag:         tip
        user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Wed Aug 31 05:24:43 2005
        summary:     Wait a little bit for tty to appear.
        
        
-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-01 18:59 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

September 1, 2005 using hg source as of:

changeset:   6572:af78c9d526e0b3502629fb0ef09064920157c0c5
user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Thu Sep  1 05:45:50 2005

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0s and DomUs
        
ISSUES:	
	* None

Last good changeset for x86_32, non-PAE:

        changeset:   6572:af78c9d526e0b3502629fb0ef09064920157c0c5
        user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Thu Sep  1 05:45:50 2005

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * DomUs crashing under stress (below)      


ISSUES:

        ** #211 – DomU dying: Kernel panic - not syncing: Unable to
        reduce memory reservation
        * Problem manifests while running LTP on both dom0 and domU
        * Problem occurred on x86_64 as well.
        * Observed on both SLES 9 and FC4 machines
        
       
        Last good changeset for x86_32 (PAE):
        
        changeset:   6548:6d4c0bfc3c1c15d1871d17698bfd78a9ea05aff5
        tag:         tip
        user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Wed Aug 31 05:24:43 2005
        summary:     Wait a little bit for tty to appear.
        

x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional domains
        * DomU crashes under stress
        
ISSUES:
       
        ** #211 – DomU dying: Kernel panic - not syncing: Unable to
        reduce memory reservation
        
        Last good changeset for x86_64:
                
        changeset:   6548:6d4c0bfc3c1c15d1871d17698bfd78a9ea05aff5
        tag:         tip
        user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Wed Aug 31 05:24:43 2005
        summary:     Wait a little bit for tty to appear.

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-02 16:56 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

No issues observed on this build!

September 2, 2005 using hg source as of:

changeset:   6584:fc12b08bf4fe858b29317427cc0db82d29764c5f
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Fri Sep  2 05:04:42 2005
summary:     Mini-os fixes from Simon Kagstrom.

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs
        
ISSUES: 
        * None

Last good changeset for x86_32, non-PAE:

        changeset:   6584:fc12b08bf4fe858b29317427cc0db82d29764c5f
        tag:         tip
        user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Fri Sep  2 05:04:42 2005
        summary:     Mini-os fixes from Simon Kagstrom.


x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs
     

ISSUES:

        * None
        
       
        Last good changeset for x86_32 (PAE):
        
        changeset:   6584:fc12b08bf4fe858b29317427cc0db82d29764c5f
        tag:         tip
        user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Fri Sep  2 05:04:42 2005
        summary:     Mini-os fixes from Simon Kagstrom.
        

x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs
        
ISSUES:
       
        * None
        
        Last good changeset for x86_64:
                
        changeset:   6584:fc12b08bf4fe858b29317427cc0db82d29764c5f
        tag:         tip
        user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Fri Sep  2 05:04:42 2005
        summary:     Mini-os fixes from Simon Kagstrom.

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-06 17:16 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

September 6, 2005 using hg source as of:

Last good changeset for ALL platforms:

changeset:   6633:60bf463f79a85d92f55bbe42c45856fc791dd7d7
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Tue Sep  6 04:44:58 2005
summary:     Fix vmalloc fault path in arch/xen/i386 to correctly deal

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs
        
ISSUES: None

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs
     

ISSUES: None
        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs
        
ISSUES: None

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-07 18:15 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

September 7, 2005 using hg source as of:

Last good changeset for ALL platforms:

changeset:   6654:c9fd91d7540d5bc89cb89cb4b18309054fb9d40a
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Wed Sep  7 05:04:54 2005
summary:     Be more sensitive to losing sync with platform timer.

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs
        
ISSUES: None

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs
     

ISSUES: None
        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs
        
ISSUES: None

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-08 15:51 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

September 8, 2005 using hg source as of:

Last good changeset for x86 platforms:

changeset:   6682:12ff9c954aceb9c84c9e730886d3cd538a6ec56a
tag:         tip
user:        iap10@freefall.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Wed Sep  7 20:07:15 2005
summary:     Give each domain some memory below 4GB. This solves the
"PGD''s must be below 4GB" for the initial page tables.
I''m not sure
we''ll stick with this approach, but this is good enough for the time
being.

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs
        
ISSUES: None

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs
     

ISSUES: None
        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Problems creating guest domains on SLES 9 SP2 boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP on host and guest domains on *FC4 box*

        Last good changeset for x86_64:
        
        changeset:   6654:c9fd91d7540d5bc89cb89cb4b18309054fb9d40a
        tag:         tip
        user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Wed Sep  7 05:04:54 2005
        summary:     Be more sensitive to losing sync with platform
        timer.
        
ISSUE(S): 
        
        * x86_64 - Error creating domain: (12, ''Cannot allocate
memory'')
        * SLES 9 SP2 boxes only--not affecting the FC4 machine
        * Bugzilla #221



-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-09 16:54 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

September 9, 2005 using hg source as of:

Last good changeset for ALL platforms:

changeset:   6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
tag:         tip
parent:      6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
parent:      6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
summary:     merge?

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
        
ISSUES: None

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0s and DomUs
     

ISSUES: None
        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
       
ISSUE(S): None    
       


-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh

2005-Sep-09 17:18 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

David,

Are you trying SMP DomUs?

Aravindh
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-devel-
> bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of David F Barrera
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:55 PM
> To: xen-devel
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> 
> 
> September 9, 2005 using hg source as of:
> 
> Last good changeset for ALL platforms:
> 
> changeset:   6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
> tag:         tip
> parent:      6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
> parent:      6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
> user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
> date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
> summary:     merge?
> 
> x86_32 (no PAE support)
> 
>         * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
>         * Builds and boots without problems
>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> 
> ISSUES: None
> 
> x86_32 (PAE)
> 
>         * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and
IBM>         ThinkCentre
>         * Builds and boots without problems
>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>         * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0s and DomUs
> 
> 
> ISSUES: None
> 
> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
> 
>         * Builds and boots without problems
>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> 
> ISSUE(S): None
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Regards,
> 
> David F Barrera
> Linux Technology Center
> Systems and Technology Group, IBM
> 
> "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
>                                                         Euripides
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-09 17:25 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 13:18 -0400, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
wrote:> David,
> 
> Are you trying SMP DomUs?
No, but you can help us with them:-)
> 
> Aravindh
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-devel-
> > bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of David F Barrera
> > Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:55 PM
> > To: xen-devel
> > Subject: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> > 
> > 
> > September 9, 2005 using hg source as of:
> > 
> > Last good changeset for ALL platforms:
> > 
> > changeset:   6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
> > tag:         tip
> > parent:      6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
> > parent:      6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
> > user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
> > date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
> > summary:     merge?
> > 
> > x86_32 (no PAE support)
> > 
> >         * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
> >         * Builds and boots without problems
> >         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> >         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> > 
> > ISSUES: None
> > 
> > x86_32 (PAE)
> > 
> >         * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and
> IBM
> >         ThinkCentre
> >         * Builds and boots without problems
> >         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> >         * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0s and DomUs
> > 
> > 
> > ISSUES: None
> > 
> > x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
> > 
> >         * Builds and boots without problems
> >         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> >         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> > 
> > ISSUE(S): None
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Regards,
> > 
> > David F Barrera
> > Linux Technology Center
> > Systems and Technology Group, IBM
> > 
> > "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
> >                                                         Euripides
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> -- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Nakajima, Jun

2005-Sep-09 17:36 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

David F Barrera wrote:> On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 13:18 -0400, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh wrote:
>> David,
>> 
>> Are you trying SMP DomUs?
> 
> No, but you can help us with them:-)DomU is configured as SMP by default. So you can simply change the vcpuline in
the xmconfig file to test SMP domUs.


Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Subrahmanian, Raj

2005-Sep-09 17:39 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

David,

What hardware configuration are you using for your x86_32 PAE
machines(number of procs, memory etc)?
I am unable to bring up xend on x86_32 PAE Xen (4 procs, 4 GB RAM
machine). 
It gives me errors similar to this when I do xend start.
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-08/msg01290.html
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209

Raj
-----Original Message-----
From: David F Barrera [mailto:dfbp@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:26 PM
To: Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
Cc: xen-devel; Vessey, Bruce A; Subrahmanian, Raj; Koren, Bradley J
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 13:18 -0400, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
wrote:> David,
> 
> Are you trying SMP DomUs?
No, but you can help us with them:-)
> 
> Aravindh
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-devel- 
> > bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of David F Barrera
> > Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:55 PM
> > To: xen-devel
> > Subject: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> > 
> > 
> > September 9, 2005 using hg source as of:
> > 
> > Last good changeset for ALL platforms:
> > 
> > changeset:   6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
> > tag:         tip
> > parent:      6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
> > parent:      6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
> > user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
> > date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
> > summary:     merge?
> > 
> > x86_32 (no PAE support)
> > 
> >         * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
> >         * Builds and boots without problems
> >         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> >         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> > 
> > ISSUES: None
> > 
> > x86_32 (PAE)
> > 
> >         * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and
> IBM
> >         ThinkCentre
> >         * Builds and boots without problems
> >         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> >         * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0s and DomUs
> > 
> > 
> > ISSUES: None
> > 
> > x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
> > 
> >         * Builds and boots without problems
> >         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> >         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> > 
> > ISSUE(S): None
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Regards,
> > 
> > David F Barrera
> > Linux Technology Center
> > Systems and Technology Group, IBM
> > 
> > "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
> >                                                         Euripides
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> --
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-09 17:55 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 13:39 -0400, Subrahmanian, Raj
wrote:> David,
> 
> What hardware configuration are you using for your x86_32 PAE
> machines(number of procs, memory etc)?One of them has 2GB RAM, 2 procs, SCSI drives. Unfortunately, none of my
machines has more than 2GB of RAM (there are others testing on machines
with greater memory).> I am unable to bring up xend on x86_32 PAE Xen (4 procs, 4 GB RAM
> machine). 
> It gives me errors similar to this when I do xend start.
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-08/msg01290.html
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209
> 
> Raj
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David F Barrera [mailto:dfbp@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:26 PM
> To: Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
> Cc: xen-devel; Vessey, Bruce A; Subrahmanian, Raj; Koren, Bradley J
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> 
> On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 13:18 -0400, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh wrote:
> > David,
> > 
> > Are you trying SMP DomUs?
> 
> No, but you can help us with them:-)
> 
> > 
> > Aravindh
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-devel- 
> > > bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of David F Barrera
> > > Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:55 PM
> > > To: xen-devel
> > > Subject: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> > > 
> > > 
> > > September 9, 2005 using hg source as of:
> > > 
> > > Last good changeset for ALL platforms:
> > > 
> > > changeset:   6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
> > > tag:         tip
> > > parent:      6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
> > > parent:      6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
> > > user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
> > > date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
> > > summary:     merge?
> > > 
> > > x86_32 (no PAE support)
> > > 
> > >         * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
> > >         * Builds and boots without problems
> > >         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> > >         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> > > 
> > > ISSUES: None
> > > 
> > > x86_32 (PAE)
> > > 
> > >         * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s
and
> > IBM
> > >         ThinkCentre
> > >         * Builds and boots without problems
> > >         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> > >         * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0s and DomUs
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ISSUES: None
> > > 
> > > x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
> > > 
> > >         * Builds and boots without problems
> > >         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> > >         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> > > 
> > > ISSUE(S): None
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > David F Barrera
> > > Linux Technology Center
> > > Systems and Technology Group, IBM
> > > 
> > > "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
> > >                                                         Euripides
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > 
> --
> Regards,
> 
> David F Barrera
> Linux Technology Center
> Systems and Technology Group, IBM
> 
> "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
>                                                         Euripides
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> -- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ian Pratt

2005-Sep-09 18:02 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

> What hardware configuration are you using for your x86_32 PAE 
> machines(number of procs, memory etc)?
> I am unable to bring up xend on x86_32 PAE Xen (4 procs, 4 GB 
> RAM machine). 
> It gives me errors similar to this when I do xend start.
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-08/msg
> 01290.html
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209
Have you tried recently? I''ve fixed up lots of issues for PAE with
>4GB
recently.

I''m running on a 2-way 8GB box just fine.

Best,
Ian

PS: make sure you install new tools as well as the kernel/xen.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Subrahmanian, Raj

2005-Sep-09 18:34 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Ian,

I saw this happen as recently as changeset 6654.
Does doing hg pull -u and doing make world take care of installing new
tools and kernel/xen?

Raj

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Pratt [mailto:m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk] 
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:02 PM
To: Subrahmanian, Raj; David F Barrera; Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
Cc: Koren, Bradley J; xen-devel; Vessey, Bruce A; ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> What hardware configuration are you using for your x86_32 PAE 
> machines(number of procs, memory etc)?
> I am unable to bring up xend on x86_32 PAE Xen (4 procs, 4 GB RAM 
> machine).
> It gives me errors similar to this when I do xend start.
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-08/msg
> 01290.html
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209
Have you tried recently? I''ve fixed up lots of issues for PAE with
>4GB
recently.

I''m running on a 2-way 8GB box just fine.

Best,
Ian

PS: make sure you install new tools as well as the kernel/xen.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ian Pratt

2005-Sep-09 18:41 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

> I saw this happen as recently as changeset 6654.
> Does doing hg pull -u and doing make world take care of 
> installing new tools and kernel/xen?
6654 is ancient history!  There have been over 60 checkins including
several from me  marked "PAE bug fix". 

You''ll need to do a ./install.sh to install new tools.

Best,
Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Subrahmanian, Raj

2005-Sep-09 18:47 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

> > I saw this happen as recently as changeset 6654.
> > Does doing hg pull -u and doing make world take care of installing
new > > tools and kernel/xen?
> 6654 is ancient history!  There have been over 60 checkins including
several from me  marked "PAE bug fix". > You''ll need to do a ./install.sh to install new tools.
Excellent. I shall try the current version. 
The last time I tried it was Wednesday when 6654 for the tip :-)

Raj

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-09 19:47 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 13:39 -0400, Subrahmanian, Raj
wrote:> David,
> 
> What hardware configuration are you using for your x86_32 PAE
> machines(number of procs, memory etc)?
> I am unable to bring up xend on x86_32 PAE Xen (4 procs, 4 GB RAM
> machine). 
OK. I added memory to one of my machines, to 4GB, PAE enabled, and I''m
able to create fully functional DomUs. Also, I tried SMP DomUs, and
everything seems fine.
> It gives me errors similar to this when I do xend start.
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-08/msg01290.html
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209
> 
> Raj
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David F Barrera [mailto:dfbp@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:26 PM
> To: Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
> Cc: xen-devel; Vessey, Bruce A; Subrahmanian, Raj; Koren, Bradley J
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> 
> On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 13:18 -0400, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh wrote:
> > David,
> > 
> > Are you trying SMP DomUs?
> 
> No, but you can help us with them:-)
> 
> > 
> > Aravindh
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-devel- 
> > > bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of David F Barrera
> > > Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:55 PM
> > > To: xen-devel
> > > Subject: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> > > 
> > > 
> > > September 9, 2005 using hg source as of:
> > > 
> > > Last good changeset for ALL platforms:
> > > 
> > > changeset:   6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
> > > tag:         tip
> > > parent:      6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
> > > parent:      6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
> > > user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
> > > date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
> > > summary:     merge?
> > > 
> > > x86_32 (no PAE support)
> > > 
> > >         * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
> > >         * Builds and boots without problems
> > >         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> > >         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> > > 
> > > ISSUES: None
> > > 
> > > x86_32 (PAE)
> > > 
> > >         * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s
and
> > IBM
> > >         ThinkCentre
> > >         * Builds and boots without problems
> > >         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> > >         * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0s and DomUs
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ISSUES: None
> > > 
> > > x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
> > > 
> > >         * Builds and boots without problems
> > >         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> > >         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> > > 
> > > ISSUE(S): None
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > David F Barrera
> > > Linux Technology Center
> > > Systems and Technology Group, IBM
> > > 
> > > "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
> > >                                                         Euripides
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > 
> --
> Regards,
> 
> David F Barrera
> Linux Technology Center
> Systems and Technology Group, IBM
> 
> "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
>                                                         Euripides
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> -- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Nakajima, Jun

2005-Sep-09 20:57 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

David F Barrera wrote:> On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 13:39 -0400, Subrahmanian, Raj wrote:
>> David,
>> 
>> What hardware configuration are you using for your x86_32 PAE
>> machines(number of procs, memory etc)?
>> I am unable to bring up xend on x86_32 PAE Xen (4 procs, 4 GB RAM
>> machine).
> 
> OK. I added memory to one of my machines, to 4GB, PAE enabled, and
I''m
> able to create fully functional DomUs. Also, I tried SMP DomUs, and
> everything seems fine.Well, I''ve got the follwing. This machine is an 8-way machine with 8GB
memory. X86_64 xenlinux boots fine there.

changeset:   6714:41a74438bcba
tag:         tip
user:        shand@ubuntu.eng.hq.xensource.com
date:        Fri Sep  9 11:36:48 2005 -0800
summary:     Fix ''xm info'' (sizeof(param) doesn''t do
that one might
hope). 


(XEN)  0000000100000000 - 0000000260000000 (usable)
(XEN) System RAM: 8170MB (8366132kB)
(XEN) Xen heap: 10MB (10364kB)
(XEN) PAE enabled, limit: 16 GB
(XEN) found SMP MP-table at 000fdc90
(XEN) DMI 2.3 present.
(XEN) Using APIC driver default
...
(XEN) Brought up 8 CPUs
(XEN) mtrr: v2.0 (20020519)
(XEN) *** LOADING DOMAIN 0 ***
(XEN) Xen-ELF header found:
''GUEST_OS=linux,GUEST_VER=2.6,XEN_VER=3.0,VIRT_BASE0xC0000000,PAE=yes,LOADER=generic''
(XEN) PHYSICAL MEMORY ARRANGEMENT:
(XEN)  Dom0 alloc.:   0000000005000000->0000000006000000 (2034542 pages
to be al
located)
(XEN) VIRTUAL MEMORY ARRANGEMENT:
(XEN)  Loaded kernel: c0100000->c0618f24
(XEN)  Init. ramdisk: c0619000->c0619000
(XEN)  Phys-Mach map: c0619000->c0ddfdb8
(XEN)  Start info:    c0de0000->c0de1000
(XEN)  Page tables:   c0de1000->c0dee000
(XEN)  Boot stack:    c0dee000->c0def000
(XEN)  TOTAL:         c0000000->c1000000
(XEN)  ENTRY ADDRESS: c0100000
(XEN) Scrubbing Free RAM:
......................................................
............................................done.
(XEN) *** Serial input -> DOM0 (type ''CTRL-a'' three times
to switch
input to Xen
).
(XEN) (file=/home/jnakajim/xen-unstable.hg/xen/include/asm/mm.h,
line=202) Error
 pfn 9ea85: rd=ffbeca00, od=00000000, caf=00000000, taf=00000000
(XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=2935) ptwr: Could not re-validate l1 page
(XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0:
(XEN) CPU:    0
(XEN) EIP:    e019:[<c01194a8>]
(XEN) EFLAGS: 00000246   CONTEXT: guest
(XEN) eax: 0000001a   ebx: c0577ea0   ecx: 00000001   edx: 00000000
(XEN) esi: 00007ff0   edi: 80000000   ebp: f56cb000   esp: c0577e90
(XEN) cr0: 8005003b   cr3: 05de1000
(XEN) ds: e021   es: e021   fs: 0000   gs: 0000   ss: e021   cs: e019
(XEN) Guest stack trace from esp=c0577e90:
(XEN)    9ea85063 00000000 00000063 80000000 00000007 f56cb000 00000000
00000063

(XEN)    00000000 00000063 c011688c f56cb000 0009ea85 00000063 80000000
00000001

(XEN)    9ea86000 00000132 00000000 c0586e93 00000133 9ea85000 00000000
00000063

(XEN)    80000000 f57d8fc0 9ea85000 00000537 00000000 c0584f5d 9ea85000
00000537

(XEN)    f57d8fc0 9ea85000 00000537 c0577f3c c058513a 9ea85000 00000537
0000001d

(XEN)    c05853a0 f57db000 0000001d 494d445f 0537565f 9ea85000 0023001d
000003c7

(XEN)    001f1c00 00000001 c048e0d8 c05854cf c05853a0 c058063b c05d48e0
c048e0d8

(XEN)    00000000 00000000 0000008e 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
00000000

(XEN)    00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
00000000

(XEN)    00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffe000 c0de0000 00000000
ffffe000

(XEN)    c0de0000 00000000 00000000 c0578717 c0577ff4 00000000 00000000
00000000

(XEN)    00000000 c05d48e0 00040800 c0100066
(XEN) Domain 0 shutdown: rebooting machine.

> 
>> It gives me errors similar to this when I do xend start.
>>
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-08/msg01290.html>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209
>> 
>> Raj
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David F Barrera [mailto:dfbp@us.ibm.com]
>> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:26 PM
>> To: Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
>> Cc: xen-devel; Vessey, Bruce A; Subrahmanian, Raj; Koren, Bradley J
>> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
>> 
>> On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 13:18 -0400, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh wrote:
>>> David,
>>> 
>>> Are you trying SMP DomUs?
>> 
>> No, but you can help us with them:-)
>> 
>>> 
>>> Aravindh
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-devel-
>>>> bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of David F Barrera
>>>> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:55 PM
>>>> To: xen-devel
>>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> September 9, 2005 using hg source as of:
>>>> 
>>>> Last good changeset for ALL platforms:
>>>> 
>>>> changeset:   6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
>>>> tag:         tip
>>>> parent:      6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
>>>> parent:      6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
>>>> user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
>>>> date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
>>>> summary:     merge?
>>>> 
>>>> x86_32 (no PAE support)
>>>> 
>>>>         * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
>>>>         * Builds and boots without problems
>>>>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>>>>         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
>>>> 
>>>> ISSUES: None
>>>> 
>>>> x86_32 (PAE)
>>>> 
>>>>         * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305,
335s
>>>> and IBM         ThinkCentre 
>>>>         * Builds and boots without problems
>>>>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>>>>         * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0s and DomUs
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ISSUES: None
>>>> 
>>>> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
>>>> 
>>>>         * Builds and boots without problems
>>>>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>>>>         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
>>>> 
>>>> ISSUE(S): None
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> David F Barrera
>>>> Linux Technology Center
>>>> Systems and Technology Group, IBM
>>>> 
>>>> "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
>>>>                                                        
Euripides
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>> 
>> --
>> Regards,
>> 
>> David F Barrera
>> Linux Technology Center
>> Systems and Technology Group, IBM
>> 
>> "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
>>                                                         Euripides
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ian Pratt

2005-Sep-09 22:09 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

> Well, I''ve got the follwing. This machine is an 8-way machine 
> with 8GB memory. X86_64 xenlinux boots fine there.
That''s a new one on me. Please can you boot with forced wrpt emulation
so we can get a better error.

Also, does it boot ok if mem=4095M ?

Thanks,
Ian 
 > changeset:   6714:41a74438bcba
> tag:         tip
> user:        shand@ubuntu.eng.hq.xensource.com
> date:        Fri Sep  9 11:36:48 2005 -0800
> summary:     Fix ''xm info'' (sizeof(param)
doesn''t do that one might
> hope). 
> 
> 
> (XEN)  0000000100000000 - 0000000260000000 (usable)
> (XEN) System RAM: 8170MB (8366132kB)
> (XEN) Xen heap: 10MB (10364kB)
> (XEN) PAE enabled, limit: 16 GB
> (XEN) found SMP MP-table at 000fdc90
> (XEN) DMI 2.3 present.
> (XEN) Using APIC driver default
> ...
> (XEN) Brought up 8 CPUs
> (XEN) mtrr: v2.0 (20020519)
> (XEN) *** LOADING DOMAIN 0 ***
> (XEN) Xen-ELF header found:
> ''GUEST_OS=linux,GUEST_VER=2.6,XEN_VER=3.0,VIRT_BASE>
0xC0000000,PAE=yes,LOADER=generic''
> (XEN) PHYSICAL MEMORY ARRANGEMENT:
> (XEN)  Dom0 alloc.:   0000000005000000->0000000006000000 
> (2034542 pages
> to be al
> located)
> (XEN) VIRTUAL MEMORY ARRANGEMENT:
> (XEN)  Loaded kernel: c0100000->c0618f24
> (XEN)  Init. ramdisk: c0619000->c0619000
> (XEN)  Phys-Mach map: c0619000->c0ddfdb8
> (XEN)  Start info:    c0de0000->c0de1000
> (XEN)  Page tables:   c0de1000->c0dee000
> (XEN)  Boot stack:    c0dee000->c0def000
> (XEN)  TOTAL:         c0000000->c1000000
> (XEN)  ENTRY ADDRESS: c0100000
> (XEN) Scrubbing Free RAM:
> ......................................................
> ............................................done.
> (XEN) *** Serial input -> DOM0 (type ''CTRL-a'' three
times to
> switch input to Xen ).
> (XEN) (file=/home/jnakajim/xen-unstable.hg/xen/include/asm/mm.h,
> line=202) Error
>  pfn 9ea85: rd=ffbeca00, od=00000000, caf=00000000, taf=00000000
> (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=2935) ptwr: Could not re-validate l1 page
> (XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0:
> (XEN) CPU:    0
> (XEN) EIP:    e019:[<c01194a8>]
> (XEN) EFLAGS: 00000246   CONTEXT: guest
> (XEN) eax: 0000001a   ebx: c0577ea0   ecx: 00000001   edx: 00000000
> (XEN) esi: 00007ff0   edi: 80000000   ebp: f56cb000   esp: c0577e90
> (XEN) cr0: 8005003b   cr3: 05de1000
> (XEN) ds: e021   es: e021   fs: 0000   gs: 0000   ss: e021   cs: e019
> (XEN) Guest stack trace from esp=c0577e90:
> (XEN)    9ea85063 00000000 00000063 80000000 00000007 
> f56cb000 00000000
> 00000063
> 
> (XEN)    00000000 00000063 c011688c f56cb000 0009ea85 
> 00000063 80000000
> 00000001
> 
> (XEN)    9ea86000 00000132 00000000 c0586e93 00000133 
> 9ea85000 00000000
> 00000063
> 
> (XEN)    80000000 f57d8fc0 9ea85000 00000537 00000000 
> c0584f5d 9ea85000
> 00000537
> 
> (XEN)    f57d8fc0 9ea85000 00000537 c0577f3c c058513a 
> 9ea85000 00000537
> 0000001d
> 
> (XEN)    c05853a0 f57db000 0000001d 494d445f 0537565f 
> 9ea85000 0023001d
> 000003c7
> 
> (XEN)    001f1c00 00000001 c048e0d8 c05854cf c05853a0 
> c058063b c05d48e0
> c048e0d8
> 
> (XEN)    00000000 00000000 0000008e 00000000 00000000 
> 00000000 00000000
> 00000000
> 
> (XEN)    00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 
> 00000000 00000000
> 00000000
> 
> (XEN)    00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffe000 
> c0de0000 00000000
> ffffe000
> 
> (XEN)    c0de0000 00000000 00000000 c0578717 c0577ff4 
> 00000000 00000000
> 00000000
> 
> (XEN)    00000000 c05d48e0 00040800 c0100066
> (XEN) Domain 0 shutdown: rebooting machine.
> 
> 
> > 
> >> It gives me errors similar to this when I do xend start.
> >>
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-08/msg
> 01290.html
> >> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209
> >> 
> >> Raj
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: David F Barrera [mailto:dfbp@us.ibm.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:26 PM
> >> To: Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
> >> Cc: xen-devel; Vessey, Bruce A; Subrahmanian, Raj; Koren, Bradley
J
> >> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> >> 
> >> On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 13:18 -0400, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
wrote:
> >>> David,
> >>> 
> >>> Are you trying SMP DomUs?
> >> 
> >> No, but you can help us with them:-)
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> Aravindh
> >>> 
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
[mailto:xen-devel-
> >>>> bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of David F Barrera
> >>>> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:55 PM
> >>>> To: xen-devel
> >>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> September 9, 2005 using hg source as of:
> >>>> 
> >>>> Last good changeset for ALL platforms:
> >>>> 
> >>>> changeset:   6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
> >>>> tag:         tip
> >>>> parent:      6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
> >>>> parent:      6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
> >>>> user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
> >>>> date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
> >>>> summary:     merge?
> >>>> 
> >>>> x86_32 (no PAE support)
> >>>> 
> >>>>         * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
> >>>>         * Builds and boots without problems
> >>>>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> >>>>         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> >>>> 
> >>>> ISSUES: None
> >>>> 
> >>>> x86_32 (PAE)
> >>>> 
> >>>>         * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries
305, 335s
> >>>> and IBM         ThinkCentre 
> >>>>         * Builds and boots without problems
> >>>>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> >>>>         * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0s and DomUs
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> ISSUES: None
> >>>> 
> >>>> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
> >>>> 
> >>>>         * Builds and boots without problems
> >>>>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
> >>>>         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> >>>> 
> >>>> ISSUE(S): None
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> --
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> 
> >>>> David F Barrera
> >>>> Linux Technology Center
> >>>> Systems and Technology Group, IBM
> >>>> 
> >>>> "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
> >>>>                                                        
Euripides
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Xen-devel mailing list
> >>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> >>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >>> 
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> 
> >> David F Barrera
> >> Linux Technology Center
> >> Systems and Technology Group, IBM
> >> 
> >> "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
> >>                                                         Euripides
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Xen-devel mailing list
> >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 
> Jun
> ---
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Nakajima, Jun

2005-Sep-09 22:36 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Ian Pratt wrote:>> Well, I''ve got the follwing. This machine is an 8-way machine
>> with 8GB memory. X86_64 xenlinux boots fine there.
> 
> That''s a new one on me. Please can you boot with forced wrpt
emulation
> so we can get a better error.No, it did not help. maxcpus=1 did not help either.
> 
> Also, does it boot ok if mem=4095M ?With mem=2g it booted fine.

(XEN) Truncating memory map to 2097152kB
(XEN) Physical RAM map:
(XEN)  0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable)
(XEN)  000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
(XEN)  00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
(XEN)  0000000000100000 - 0000000080000000 (usable)
(XEN) System RAM: 2047MB (2096764kB)
(XEN) Xen heap: 10MB (10604kB)
(XEN) PAE enabled, limit: 16 GB
(XEN) found SMP MP-table at 000fdc90

I feel we have some bug in parsing the E820 map with the 32-bit side,
and in fact this machine has a challenging one (but both x86_64 xenlinux
and x86 PAE Linux can handle). Look at the contiguous part starting at
0x10000. As far as that range is used, it works fine. 

(XEN) Physical RAM map:
(XEN)  0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable)
(XEN)  000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
(XEN)  00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
(XEN)  0000000000100000 - 000000009e841000 (usable)
(XEN)  000000009e841000 - 000000009e847000 (reserved)
(XEN)  000000009e847000 - 000000009e848000 (usable)
(XEN)  000000009e848000 - 000000009e84b000 (reserved)
(XEN)  000000009e84b000 - 000000009e84c000 (usable)
(XEN)  000000009e84c000 - 000000009e852000 (reserved)
(XEN)  000000009e852000 - 000000009ea54000 (usable)
(XEN)  000000009ea54000 - 000000009ea5d000 (reserved)
(XEN)  000000009ea5d000 - 000000009ea86000 (usable)
(XEN)  000000009ea86000 - 000000009eb0c000 (ACPI data)
(XEN)  000000009eb0c000 - 000000009eb0f000 (reserved)
(XEN)  000000009eb0f000 - 000000009eb18000 (ACPI data)
(XEN)  000000009eb18000 - 000000009eb19000 (reserved)
(XEN)  000000009eb19000 - 000000009ef50000 (ACPI data)
(XEN)  000000009ef50000 - 000000009ef56000 (reserved)
(XEN)  000000009ef56000 - 000000009f111000 (ACPI data)
(XEN)  000000009f111000 - 000000009f114000 (ACPI NVS)
(XEN)  000000009f114000 - 000000009f122000 (ACPI data)
(XEN)  000000009f122000 - 000000009f12b000 (ACPI NVS)
(XEN)  000000009f12b000 - 000000009f146000 (ACPI data)
(XEN)  000000009f146000 - 000000009f18f000 (ACPI NVS)
(XEN)  000000009f18f000 - 000000009f190000 (ACPI data)
(XEN)  000000009f190000 - 000000009f191000 (ACPI NVS)
(XEN)  000000009f191000 - 000000009f192000 (ACPI data)
(XEN)  000000009f192000 - 000000009f193000 (ACPI NVS)
(XEN)  000000009f193000 - 000000009f194000 (ACPI data)
(XEN)  000000009f194000 - 000000009f195000 (ACPI NVS)
(XEN)  000000009f195000 - 000000009f1b7000 (ACPI data)
(XEN)  000000009f1b7000 - 000000009f1b8000 (ACPI NVS)
(XEN)  000000009f1b8000 - 000000009fc00000 (ACPI data)
(XEN)  00000000ffe00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
(XEN)  0000000100000000 - 0000000260000000 (usable)
(XEN) System RAM: 8170MB (8366132kB)
(XEN) Xen heap: 10MB (10364kB)
(XEN) PAE enabled, limit: 16 GB
(XEN) found SMP MP-table at 000fdc90

> 
> Thanks,
> Ian
> 
>> changeset:   6714:41a74438bcba
>> tag:         tip
>> user:        shand@ubuntu.eng.hq.xensource.com
>> date:        Fri Sep  9 11:36:48 2005 -0800
>> summary:     Fix ''xm info'' (sizeof(param)
doesn''t do that one might
>> hope). 
>> 
>> 
>> (XEN)  0000000100000000 - 0000000260000000 (usable)
>> (XEN) System RAM: 8170MB (8366132kB)
>> (XEN) Xen heap: 10MB (10364kB)
>> (XEN) PAE enabled, limit: 16 GB
>> (XEN) found SMP MP-table at 000fdc90
>> (XEN) DMI 2.3 present.
>> (XEN) Using APIC driver default
>> ...
>> (XEN) Brought up 8 CPUs
>> (XEN) mtrr: v2.0 (20020519)
>> (XEN) *** LOADING DOMAIN 0 ***
>> (XEN) Xen-ELF header found:
>> ''GUEST_OS=linux,GUEST_VER=2.6,XEN_VER=3.0,VIRT_BASE>>
0xC0000000,PAE=yes,LOADER=generic''
>> (XEN) PHYSICAL MEMORY ARRANGEMENT:
>> (XEN)  Dom0 alloc.:   0000000005000000->0000000006000000 (2034542
>> pages to be al
>> located)
>> (XEN) VIRTUAL MEMORY ARRANGEMENT:
>> (XEN)  Loaded kernel: c0100000->c0618f24
>> (XEN)  Init. ramdisk: c0619000->c0619000
>> (XEN)  Phys-Mach map: c0619000->c0ddfdb8
>> (XEN)  Start info:    c0de0000->c0de1000
>> (XEN)  Page tables:   c0de1000->c0dee000
>> (XEN)  Boot stack:    c0dee000->c0def000
>> (XEN)  TOTAL:         c0000000->c1000000
>> (XEN)  ENTRY ADDRESS: c0100000
>> (XEN) Scrubbing Free RAM:
>> ......................................................
>> ............................................done.
>> (XEN) *** Serial input -> DOM0 (type ''CTRL-a''
three times to
>> switch input to Xen ).
>> (XEN) (file=/home/jnakajim/xen-unstable.hg/xen/include/asm/mm.h,
>>  line=202) Error pfn 9ea85: rd=ffbeca00, od=00000000, caf=00000000,
>> taf=00000000 (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=2935) ptwr: Could not
>> re-validate l1 page (XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0:
>> (XEN) CPU:    0
>> (XEN) EIP:    e019:[<c01194a8>]
>> (XEN) EFLAGS: 00000246   CONTEXT: guest
>> (XEN) eax: 0000001a   ebx: c0577ea0   ecx: 00000001   edx: 00000000
>> (XEN) esi: 00007ff0   edi: 80000000   ebp: f56cb000   esp: c0577e90
>> (XEN) cr0: 8005003b   cr3: 05de1000
>> (XEN) ds: e021   es: e021   fs: 0000   gs: 0000   ss: e021   cs: e019
>> (XEN) Guest stack trace from esp=c0577e90:
>> (XEN)    9ea85063 00000000 00000063 80000000 00000007
>> f56cb000 00000000
>> 00000063
>> 
>> (XEN)    00000000 00000063 c011688c f56cb000 0009ea85 00000063
>> 80000000 00000001
>> 
>> (XEN)    9ea86000 00000132 00000000 c0586e93 00000133 9ea85000
>> 00000000 00000063
>> 
>> (XEN)    80000000 f57d8fc0 9ea85000 00000537 00000000
>> c0584f5d 9ea85000
>> 00000537
>> 
>> (XEN)    f57d8fc0 9ea85000 00000537 c0577f3c c058513a 9ea85000
>> 00000537 0000001d
>> 
>> (XEN)    c05853a0 f57db000 0000001d 494d445f 0537565f 9ea85000
>> 0023001d 000003c7
>> 
>> (XEN)    001f1c00 00000001 c048e0d8 c05854cf c05853a0
>> c058063b c05d48e0
>> c048e0d8
>> 
>> (XEN)    00000000 00000000 0000008e 00000000 00000000 00000000
>> 00000000 00000000
>> 
>> (XEN)    00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>> 00000000 00000000
>> 
>> (XEN)    00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffe000
>> c0de0000 00000000
>> ffffe000
>> 
>> (XEN)    c0de0000 00000000 00000000 c0578717 c0577ff4 00000000
>> 00000000 00000000
>> 
>> (XEN)    00000000 c05d48e0 00040800 c0100066
>> (XEN) Domain 0 shutdown: rebooting machine.
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> It gives me errors similar to this when I do xend start.
>>>> 
>> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-08/msg
>> 01290.html
>>>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209
>>>> 
>>>> Raj
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: David F Barrera [mailto:dfbp@us.ibm.com]
>>>> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:26 PM
>>>> To: Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
>>>> Cc: xen-devel; Vessey, Bruce A; Subrahmanian, Raj; Koren,
Bradley J
>>>> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 13:18 -0400, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
wrote:
>>>>> David,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Are you trying SMP DomUs?
>>>> 
>>>> No, but you can help us with them:-)
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Aravindh
>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
[mailto:xen-devel-
>>>>>> bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of David F
Barrera
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:55 PM
>>>>>> To: xen-devel
>>>>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> September 9, 2005 using hg source as of:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Last good changeset for ALL platforms:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> changeset:  
6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
>>>>>> tag:         tip
>>>>>> parent:     
6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
>>>>>> parent:     
6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
>>>>>> user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
>>>>>> date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
>>>>>> summary:     merge?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> x86_32 (no PAE support)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>         * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB
RAM)
>>>>>>         * Builds and boots without problems
>>>>>>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>>>>>>         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ISSUES: None
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> x86_32 (PAE)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>         * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries
305, 335s
>>>>>> and IBM         ThinkCentre 
>>>>>>         * Builds and boots without problems
>>>>>>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>>>>>>         * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0s and DomUs
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ISSUES: None
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>         * Builds and boots without problems
>>>>>>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>>>>>>         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ISSUE(S): None
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> David F Barrera
>>>>>> Linux Technology Center
>>>>>> Systems and Technology Group, IBM
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
>>>>>>                                                        
Euripides
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> David F Barrera
>>>> Linux Technology Center
>>>> Systems and Technology Group, IBM
>>>> 
>>>> "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
>>>>                                                        
Euripides
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Jun
>> ---
>> Intel Open Source Technology Center
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ian Pratt

2005-Sep-09 22:52 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

> > That''s a new one on me. Please can you boot with forced 
> wrpt emulation 
> > so we can get a better error.
> No, it did not help. 
But you should have got a better crash message with a more useful guest
eip.
> > 
> > Also, does it boot ok if mem=4095M ?
> With mem=2g it booted fine.
> 
> (XEN) Truncating memory map to 2097152kB
> (XEN) Physical RAM map:
> (XEN)  0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable)
> (XEN)  000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
> (XEN)  00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
> (XEN)  0000000000100000 - 0000000080000000 (usable)
> (XEN) System RAM: 2047MB (2096764kB)
> (XEN) Xen heap: 10MB (10604kB)
> (XEN) PAE enabled, limit: 16 GB
> (XEN) found SMP MP-table at 000fdc90
> 
> I feel we have some bug in parsing the E820 map with the 
> 32-bit side, and in fact this machine has a challenging one 
> (but both x86_64 xenlinux and x86 PAE Linux can handle). Look 
> at the contiguous part starting at 0x10000. As far as that 
> range is used, it works fine. 
Can you try adding a hack that just junks everything between 9e841000
and 100000000 ?

Are we tripping up on pages in the zone 9fc00000 - ffe00000 ?


Ian

> 
> (XEN) Physical RAM map:
> (XEN)  0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable)
> (XEN)  000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
> (XEN)  00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
> (XEN)  0000000000100000 - 000000009e841000 (usable)
> (XEN)  000000009e841000 - 000000009e847000 (reserved)
> (XEN)  000000009e847000 - 000000009e848000 (usable)
> (XEN)  000000009e848000 - 000000009e84b000 (reserved)
> (XEN)  000000009e84b000 - 000000009e84c000 (usable)
> (XEN)  000000009e84c000 - 000000009e852000 (reserved)
> (XEN)  000000009e852000 - 000000009ea54000 (usable)
> (XEN)  000000009ea54000 - 000000009ea5d000 (reserved)
> (XEN)  000000009ea5d000 - 000000009ea86000 (usable)
> (XEN)  000000009ea86000 - 000000009eb0c000 (ACPI data)
> (XEN)  000000009eb0c000 - 000000009eb0f000 (reserved)
> (XEN)  000000009eb0f000 - 000000009eb18000 (ACPI data)
> (XEN)  000000009eb18000 - 000000009eb19000 (reserved)
> (XEN)  000000009eb19000 - 000000009ef50000 (ACPI data)
> (XEN)  000000009ef50000 - 000000009ef56000 (reserved)
> (XEN)  000000009ef56000 - 000000009f111000 (ACPI data)
> (XEN)  000000009f111000 - 000000009f114000 (ACPI NVS)
> (XEN)  000000009f114000 - 000000009f122000 (ACPI data)
> (XEN)  000000009f122000 - 000000009f12b000 (ACPI NVS)
> (XEN)  000000009f12b000 - 000000009f146000 (ACPI data)
> (XEN)  000000009f146000 - 000000009f18f000 (ACPI NVS)
> (XEN)  000000009f18f000 - 000000009f190000 (ACPI data)
> (XEN)  000000009f190000 - 000000009f191000 (ACPI NVS)
> (XEN)  000000009f191000 - 000000009f192000 (ACPI data)
> (XEN)  000000009f192000 - 000000009f193000 (ACPI NVS)
> (XEN)  000000009f193000 - 000000009f194000 (ACPI data)
> (XEN)  000000009f194000 - 000000009f195000 (ACPI NVS)
> (XEN)  000000009f195000 - 000000009f1b7000 (ACPI data)
> (XEN)  000000009f1b7000 - 000000009f1b8000 (ACPI NVS)
> (XEN)  000000009f1b8000 - 000000009fc00000 (ACPI data)
> (XEN)  00000000ffe00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
> (XEN)  0000000100000000 - 0000000260000000 (usable)
> (XEN) System RAM: 8170MB (8366132kB)
> (XEN) Xen heap: 10MB (10364kB)
> (XEN) PAE enabled, limit: 16 GB
> (XEN) found SMP MP-table at 000fdc90
> 
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Ian
> > 
> >> changeset:   6714:41a74438bcba
> >> tag:         tip
> >> user:        shand@ubuntu.eng.hq.xensource.com
> >> date:        Fri Sep  9 11:36:48 2005 -0800
> >> summary:     Fix ''xm info'' (sizeof(param)
doesn''t do that one might
> >> hope). 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> (XEN)  0000000100000000 - 0000000260000000 (usable)
> >> (XEN) System RAM: 8170MB (8366132kB)
> >> (XEN) Xen heap: 10MB (10364kB)
> >> (XEN) PAE enabled, limit: 16 GB
> >> (XEN) found SMP MP-table at 000fdc90
> >> (XEN) DMI 2.3 present.
> >> (XEN) Using APIC driver default
> >> ...
> >> (XEN) Brought up 8 CPUs
> >> (XEN) mtrr: v2.0 (20020519)
> >> (XEN) *** LOADING DOMAIN 0 ***
> >> (XEN) Xen-ELF header found:
> >> ''GUEST_OS=linux,GUEST_VER=2.6,XEN_VER=3.0,VIRT_BASE>
>> 0xC0000000,PAE=yes,LOADER=generic''
> >> (XEN) PHYSICAL MEMORY ARRANGEMENT:
> >> (XEN)  Dom0 alloc.:   0000000005000000->0000000006000000
(2034542
> >> pages to be al
> >> located)
> >> (XEN) VIRTUAL MEMORY ARRANGEMENT:
> >> (XEN)  Loaded kernel: c0100000->c0618f24
> >> (XEN)  Init. ramdisk: c0619000->c0619000
> >> (XEN)  Phys-Mach map: c0619000->c0ddfdb8
> >> (XEN)  Start info:    c0de0000->c0de1000
> >> (XEN)  Page tables:   c0de1000->c0dee000
> >> (XEN)  Boot stack:    c0dee000->c0def000
> >> (XEN)  TOTAL:         c0000000->c1000000
> >> (XEN)  ENTRY ADDRESS: c0100000
> >> (XEN) Scrubbing Free RAM:
> >> ......................................................
> >> ............................................done.
> >> (XEN) *** Serial input -> DOM0 (type ''CTRL-a''
three times
> to switch 
> >> input to Xen ).
> >> (XEN) (file=/home/jnakajim/xen-unstable.hg/xen/include/asm/mm.h,
> >>  line=202) Error pfn 9ea85: rd=ffbeca00, od=00000000, 
> caf=00000000, 
> >> taf=00000000 (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=2935) ptwr: Could not 
> >> re-validate l1 page (XEN) Domain 0 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#0:
> >> (XEN) CPU:    0
> >> (XEN) EIP:    e019:[<c01194a8>]
> >> (XEN) EFLAGS: 00000246   CONTEXT: guest
> >> (XEN) eax: 0000001a   ebx: c0577ea0   ecx: 00000001   edx:
00000000
> >> (XEN) esi: 00007ff0   edi: 80000000   ebp: f56cb000   esp:
c0577e90
> >> (XEN) cr0: 8005003b   cr3: 05de1000
> >> (XEN) ds: e021   es: e021   fs: 0000   gs: 0000   ss: e021 
>   cs: e019
> >> (XEN) Guest stack trace from esp=c0577e90:
> >> (XEN)    9ea85063 00000000 00000063 80000000 00000007
> >> f56cb000 00000000
> >> 00000063
> >> 
> >> (XEN)    00000000 00000063 c011688c f56cb000 0009ea85 00000063
> >> 80000000 00000001
> >> 
> >> (XEN)    9ea86000 00000132 00000000 c0586e93 00000133 9ea85000
> >> 00000000 00000063
> >> 
> >> (XEN)    80000000 f57d8fc0 9ea85000 00000537 00000000
> >> c0584f5d 9ea85000
> >> 00000537
> >> 
> >> (XEN)    f57d8fc0 9ea85000 00000537 c0577f3c c058513a 9ea85000
> >> 00000537 0000001d
> >> 
> >> (XEN)    c05853a0 f57db000 0000001d 494d445f 0537565f 9ea85000
> >> 0023001d 000003c7
> >> 
> >> (XEN)    001f1c00 00000001 c048e0d8 c05854cf c05853a0
> >> c058063b c05d48e0
> >> c048e0d8
> >> 
> >> (XEN)    00000000 00000000 0000008e 00000000 00000000 00000000
> >> 00000000 00000000
> >> 
> >> (XEN)    00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> >> 00000000 00000000
> >> 
> >> (XEN)    00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffe000
> >> c0de0000 00000000
> >> ffffe000
> >> 
> >> (XEN)    c0de0000 00000000 00000000 c0578717 c0577ff4 00000000
> >> 00000000 00000000
> >> 
> >> (XEN)    00000000 c05d48e0 00040800 c0100066
> >> (XEN) Domain 0 shutdown: rebooting machine.
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>>> It gives me errors similar to this when I do xend start.
> >>>> 
> >> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-08/msg
> >> 01290.html
> >>>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209
> >>>> 
> >>>> Raj
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: David F Barrera [mailto:dfbp@us.ibm.com]
> >>>> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:26 PM
> >>>> To: Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
> >>>> Cc: xen-devel; Vessey, Bruce A; Subrahmanian, Raj; 
> Koren, Bradley J
> >>>> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> >>>> 
> >>>> On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 13:18 -0400, Puthiyaparambil, 
> Aravindh wrote:
> >>>>> David,
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Are you trying SMP DomUs?
> >>>> 
> >>>> No, but you can help us with them:-)
> >>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Aravindh
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
[mailto:xen-devel-
> >>>>>> bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of David F
Barrera
> >>>>>> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 12:55 PM
> >>>>>> To: xen-devel
> >>>>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> September 9, 2005 using hg source as of:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Last good changeset for ALL platforms:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> changeset:  
6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
> >>>>>> tag:         tip
> >>>>>> parent:     
6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
> >>>>>> parent:     
6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
> >>>>>> user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
> >>>>>> date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
> >>>>>> summary:     merge?
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> x86_32 (no PAE support)
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>         * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305
(1GB RAM)
> >>>>>>         * Builds and boots without problems
> >>>>>>         * Able to create fully functional guest
domains
> >>>>>>         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> ISSUES: None
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> x86_32 (PAE)
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>         * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM
xSeries
> 305, 335s
> >>>>>> and IBM         ThinkCentre 
> >>>>>>         * Builds and boots without problems
> >>>>>>         * Able to create fully functional guest
domains
> >>>>>>         * Successfully ran LTP on Dom0s and DomUs
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> ISSUES: None
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>         * Builds and boots without problems
> >>>>>>         * Able to create fully functional guest
domains
> >>>>>>         * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> ISSUE(S): None
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> David F Barrera
> >>>>>> Linux Technology Center
> >>>>>> Systems and Technology Group, IBM
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> "The wisest men follow their own direction.
"
> >>>>>>
>  Euripides
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
> >>>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> >>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >>>>> 
> >>>> --
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> 
> >>>> David F Barrera
> >>>> Linux Technology Center
> >>>> Systems and Technology Group, IBM
> >>>> 
> >>>> "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
> >>>>                                                        
Euripides
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Xen-devel mailing list
> >>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> >>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Jun
> >> ---
> >> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Xen-devel mailing list
> >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >> 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 
> Jun
> ---
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Subrahmanian, Raj

2005-Sep-10 03:13 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

I tried again with 6714.
xend start went through, no problem.
However, I got errors when I tried to do xm create vm1.
On the serial port, I got the error.
(XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1497) Error while validating pfn e0d8d for
type 26000000. caf=80000002 taf=26000001
(XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1497) Error while validating pfn e10c0 for
type 40030000. caf=80000002 taf=40030001
(XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=370) Bad page type for pfn e10c0 (00000000)
(XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1497) Error while validating pfn e09f8 for
type 67ff0000. caf=80000002 taf=67ff0001
(XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=370) Bad page type for pfn e09f8 (00000000)
(XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1723) Error while pinning mfn e09f8
On the console, I see.
''Error Creating Domain :(2, No such file or Directory).

Thanks
Raj

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Pratt [mailto:m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk] 
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:41 PM
To: Subrahmanian, Raj; David F Barrera; Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
Cc: Koren, Bradley J; xen-devel; Vessey, Bruce A;
ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk; ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

 > I saw this happen as recently as changeset 6654.
> Does doing hg pull -u and doing make world take care of installing new
> tools and kernel/xen?
6654 is ancient history!  There have been over 60 checkins including
several from me  marked "PAE bug fix". 

You''ll need to do a ./install.sh to install new tools.

Best,
Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-12 13:49 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 23:13 -0400, Subrahmanian, Raj
wrote:> I tried again with 6714.
> xend start went through, no problem.
> However, I got errors when I tried to do xm create vm1.
> On the serial port, I got the error.
> (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1497) Error while validating pfn e0d8d for
> type 26000000. caf=80000002 taf=26000001
> (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1497) Error while validating pfn e10c0 for
> type 40030000. caf=80000002 taf=40030001
> (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=370) Bad page type for pfn e10c0 (00000000)
> (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1497) Error while validating pfn e09f8 for
> type 67ff0000. caf=80000002 taf=67ff0001
> (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=370) Bad page type for pfn e09f8 (00000000)
> (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1723) Error while pinning mfn e09f8
> On the console, I see.
> ''Error Creating Domain :(2, No such file or Directory).I am getting this error on today''s build, too, on a PAE enabled box
with
4GB of physical memory, SLES 9 SP2, with the following changeset:

changeset:   6737:413c911e5780b83b622d1db84a873fe6303ed150
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Mon Sep 12 07:48:33 2005
summary:     Re-indent xc_linux_restore, and add code to force PAE

x335b:/tmp/xen # xm create -c vm1.cfg
Using config file "vm1.cfg".
Error: Error creating domain: (2, ''No such file or directory'')

x335b:/tmp/xen # xm list
Unexpected error: xen.xend.XendProtocol.XendError

Please report to xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/sbin/xm", line 10, in ?
    main.main(sys.argv)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xm/main.py", line 710, in
main
    rc = cmd(args)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xm/main.py", line 226, in
xm_list
    doms = server.xend_domains()
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendClient.py", line
199, in xend_domains
    return self.xendGet(self.domainurl())
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendClient.py", line
152, in xendGet
    return self.client.xendGet(url, args)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py", line
86, in xendGet
    return self.xendRequest(url, "GET", args)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py", line
170, in xendRequest
    val = self.handleStatus(resp.version, resp.status, resp.reason)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py", line
106, in handleStatus
    return self.handleException(XendError(message))
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py", line
132, in handleException
    raise err
xen.xend.XendProtocol.XendError: Internal server error
x335b:/tmp/xen #


> 
> Thanks
> Raj
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Pratt [mailto:m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:41 PM
> To: Subrahmanian, Raj; David F Barrera; Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
> Cc: Koren, Bradley J; xen-devel; Vessey, Bruce A;
> ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk; ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> 
>  
> > I saw this happen as recently as changeset 6654.
> > Does doing hg pull -u and doing make world take care of installing new
> 
> > tools and kernel/xen?
> 
> 6654 is ancient history!  There have been over 60 checkins including
> several from me  marked "PAE bug fix". 
> 
> You''ll need to do a ./install.sh to install new tools.
> 
> Best,
> Ian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> -- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Daniel Hulme

2005-Sep-12 14:38 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

> I am getting this error on today''s build, too, on a PAE enabled
box
> with 4GB of physical memory, SLES 9 SP2, with the following changeset:
Same error here on fatmansam running Saturday''s unstable w/o PAE on
Debian Sid. It seems to be working now, though. Some combination of
fiddling with config files and restarting xend sorted it out.
> x335b:/tmp/xen # xm list
> Unexpected error: xen.xend.XendProtocol.XendErrorThis one is intermittent: doing xm list a few more times will shift it
''til the next failed create.

-- 
Though  I''m deep  inside a storm  it won''t  defeat  me, 
Floating  free.
Look out  here comes trouble,  Maybe I''m  just pushing through  a
dream,
But strange how things feel quite real to me.  http://surreal.istic.org/
That which will guide the lost child back to her mother''s arms...
EXILE.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-12 17:53 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

September 12, 2005 using hg source as of:

Last good changeset for x86_32 platforms:

changeset:   6737:413c911e5780b83b622d1db84a873fe6303ed150
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Mon Sep 12 07:48:33 2005
summary:     Re-indent xc_linux_restore, and add code to force PAE


x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
        
ISSUES: None

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains on machines with
        memory < 4GB
	* UNABLE TO CREATE guest domain on machine with memory = 4GB
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and guest domains,
        except machine with mem > 4Gb.

ISSUES: 

	* UNABLE TO CREATE guest domain on machine with memory = 4GB
        * Bugzilla #209 -Problems creating DomUs with large memory
        system/PAEenabled
        * (reported by raj.subrahmanian@unisys.com)


        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs


	Tested using changeset:  
	Last good changeset for x86_64 platforms:
        
	6731:2c2c0b843f05083bf229286680d4adbb38d622a0
        tag:         tip
        user:        vh249@arcadians.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Mon Sep 12 05:54:30 2005
        summary:     removing XEN_LOCALVERSION for a smaller alternative
        
ISSUE(S): None

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-13 15:47 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Error: Error creating domain: (2, ''No such file or directory'')

Still unable to create a guest domain on a PAE enabled SLES 9 SP2 box
with 4GB of physical memory. 

x335b:~ # xm list
Name              Id  Mem(MB)  CPU VCPU(s)  State  Time(s)
Domain-0           0      495    0      1   r----    665.3


x335b:/tmp/xen # xm create -c vm1.cfg
Using config file "vm1.cfg".
Error: Error creating domain: (2, ''No such file or directory'')
x335b:/tmp/xen #

x335b:/tmp/xen # xm list
Unexpected error: xen.xend.XendProtocol.XendError

Please report to xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/sbin/xm", line 10, in ?
    main.main(sys.argv)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xm/main.py", line 710, in
main
    rc = cmd(args)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xm/main.py", line 226, in
xm_list
    doms = server.xend_domains()
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendClient.py", line
199, in xend_domains
    return self.xendGet(self.domainurl())
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendClient.py", line
152, in xendGet
    return self.client.xendGet(url, args)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py", line
86, in xendGet
    return self.xendRequest(url, "GET", args)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py", line
170, in xendRequest
    val = self.handleStatus(resp.version, resp.status, resp.reason)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py", line
106, in handleStatus
    return self.handleException(XendError(message))
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py", line
132, in handleException
    raise err
xen.xend.XendProtocol.XendError: Internal server error



On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 08:49 -0500, David F Barrera wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 23:13 -0400, Subrahmanian, Raj wrote:
> > I tried again with 6714.
> > xend start went through, no problem.
> > However, I got errors when I tried to do xm create vm1.
> > On the serial port, I got the error.
> > (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1497) Error while validating pfn e0d8d
for
> > type 26000000. caf=80000002 taf=26000001
> > (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1497) Error while validating pfn e10c0
for
> > type 40030000. caf=80000002 taf=40030001
> > (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=370) Bad page type for pfn e10c0
(00000000)
> > (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1497) Error while validating pfn e09f8
for
> > type 67ff0000. caf=80000002 taf=67ff0001
> > (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=370) Bad page type for pfn e09f8
(00000000)
> > (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1723) Error while pinning mfn e09f8
> > On the console, I see.
> > ''Error Creating Domain :(2, No such file or Directory).
> I am getting this error on today''s build, too, on a PAE enabled
box with
> 4GB of physical memory, SLES 9 SP2, with the following changeset:
> 
> changeset:   6737:413c911e5780b83b622d1db84a873fe6303ed150
> tag:         tip
> user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
> date:        Mon Sep 12 07:48:33 2005
> summary:     Re-indent xc_linux_restore, and add code to force PAE
> 
> x335b:/tmp/xen # xm create -c vm1.cfg
> Using config file "vm1.cfg".
> Error: Error creating domain: (2, ''No such file or
directory'')
> 
> x335b:/tmp/xen # xm list
> Unexpected error: xen.xend.XendProtocol.XendError
> 
> Please report to xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/sbin/xm", line 10, in ?
>     main.main(sys.argv)
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xm/main.py", line 710, in
> main
>     rc = cmd(args)
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xm/main.py", line 226, in
> xm_list
>     doms = server.xend_domains()
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendClient.py", line
> 199, in xend_domains
>     return self.xendGet(self.domainurl())
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendClient.py", line
> 152, in xendGet
>     return self.client.xendGet(url, args)
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py",
line
> 86, in xendGet
>     return self.xendRequest(url, "GET", args)
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py",
line
> 170, in xendRequest
>     val = self.handleStatus(resp.version, resp.status, resp.reason)
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py",
line
> 106, in handleStatus
>     return self.handleException(XendError(message))
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py",
line
> 132, in handleException
>     raise err
> xen.xend.XendProtocol.XendError: Internal server error
> x335b:/tmp/xen #
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Raj
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian Pratt [mailto:m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk] 
> > Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:41 PM
> > To: Subrahmanian, Raj; David F Barrera; Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
> > Cc: Koren, Bradley J; xen-devel; Vessey, Bruce A;
> > ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk; ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk
> > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> > 
> >  
> > > I saw this happen as recently as changeset 6654.
> > > Does doing hg pull -u and doing make world take care of
installing new
> > 
> > > tools and kernel/xen?
> > 
> > 6654 is ancient history!  There have been over 60 checkins including
> > several from me  marked "PAE bug fix". 
> > 
> > You''ll need to do a ./install.sh to install new tools.
> > 
> > Best,
> > Ian
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > -- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Li Ge

2005-Sep-13 16:21 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Error: Error creating domain: (2, ''No such file or directory'')

I''ve seen the exact same problems that David is seeing on my 8G RAM x86
box. It is a PAE enabled SLES9 SP2 box.

Here is the memory allocation setting of dom0 and domU I had problem with:

dom0: 5120 MB   domU: 512 MB


But, with the following setting,  both dom0 and domU work perfectly for me:

dom0: 512 MB  domU: 5120 MB


The changeset is : 6739

Thanks,
Li




                                                                           
             dfbp@us.ltcfwd.li                                             
             nux.ibm.com                                                   
             Sent by:                                                   To 
             xen-devel-bounces         xen-devel                           
             @lists.xensource.         <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
             com                                                        cc 
                                       Ian Pratt                           
                                       <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>
             09/13/2005 10:47                                      Subject 
             AM                        [Xen-devel] Error: Error creating   
                                       domain: (2, ''No such file or
                                       directory'')
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           





Still unable to create a guest domain on a PAE enabled SLES 9 SP2 box
with 4GB of physical memory.

x335b:~ # xm list
Name              Id  Mem(MB)  CPU VCPU(s)  State  Time(s)
Domain-0           0      495    0      1   r----    665.3


x335b:/tmp/xen # xm create -c vm1.cfg
Using config file "vm1.cfg".
Error: Error creating domain: (2, ''No such file or directory'')
x335b:/tmp/xen #

x335b:/tmp/xen # xm list
Unexpected error: xen.xend.XendProtocol.XendError

Please report to xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/sbin/xm", line 10, in ?
    main.main(sys.argv)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xm/main.py", line 710, in
main
    rc = cmd(args)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xm/main.py", line 226, in
xm_list
    doms = server.xend_domains()
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendClient.py", line
199, in xend_domains
    return self.xendGet(self.domainurl())
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendClient.py", line
152, in xendGet
    return self.client.xendGet(url, args)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py", line
86, in xendGet
    return self.xendRequest(url, "GET", args)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py", line
170, in xendRequest
    val = self.handleStatus(resp.version, resp.status, resp.reason)
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py", line
106, in handleStatus
    return self.handleException(XendError(message))
  File "/tmp/xen-
unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py", line
132, in handleException
    raise err
xen.xend.XendProtocol.XendError: Internal server error



On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 08:49 -0500, David F Barrera
wrote:> On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 23:13 -0400, Subrahmanian, Raj wrote:
> > I tried again with 6714.
> > xend start went through, no problem.
> > However, I got errors when I tried to do xm create vm1.
> > On the serial port, I got the error.
> > (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1497) Error while validating pfn e0d8d
for
> > type 26000000. caf=80000002 taf=26000001
> > (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1497) Error while validating pfn e10c0
for
> > type 40030000. caf=80000002 taf=40030001
> > (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=370) Bad page type for pfn e10c0
(00000000)> > (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1497) Error while validating pfn e09f8
for
> > type 67ff0000. caf=80000002 taf=67ff0001
> > (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=370) Bad page type for pfn e09f8
(00000000)> > (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1723) Error while pinning mfn e09f8
> > On the console, I see.
> > ''Error Creating Domain :(2, No such file or Directory).
> I am getting this error on today''s build, too, on a PAE enabled
box with
> 4GB of physical memory, SLES 9 SP2, with the following changeset:
>
> changeset:   6737:413c911e5780b83b622d1db84a873fe6303ed150
> tag:         tip
> user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
> date:        Mon Sep 12 07:48:33 2005
> summary:     Re-indent xc_linux_restore, and add code to force PAE
>
> x335b:/tmp/xen # xm create -c vm1.cfg
> Using config file "vm1.cfg".
> Error: Error creating domain: (2, ''No such file or
directory'')
>
> x335b:/tmp/xen # xm list
> Unexpected error: xen.xend.XendProtocol.XendError
>
> Please report to xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/sbin/xm", line 10, in ?
>     main.main(sys.argv)
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xm/main.py", line 710, in
> main
>     rc = cmd(args)
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xm/main.py", line 226, in
> xm_list
>     doms = server.xend_domains()
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendClient.py", line
> 199, in xend_domains
>     return self.xendGet(self.domainurl())
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendClient.py", line
> 152, in xendGet
>     return self.client.xendGet(url, args)
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py",
line
> 86, in xendGet
>     return self.xendRequest(url, "GET", args)
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py",
line
> 170, in xendRequest
>     val = self.handleStatus(resp.version, resp.status, resp.reason)
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py",
line
> 106, in handleStatus
>     return self.handleException(XendError(message))
>   File "/tmp/xen-
> unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib/python/xen/xend/XendProtocol.py",
line
> 132, in handleException
>     raise err
> xen.xend.XendProtocol.XendError: Internal server error
> x335b:/tmp/xen #
>
>
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > Raj
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian Pratt [mailto:m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk]
> > Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:41 PM
> > To: Subrahmanian, Raj; David F Barrera; Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
> > Cc: Koren, Bradley J; xen-devel; Vessey, Bruce A;
> > ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk; ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk
> > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
> >
> >
> > > I saw this happen as recently as changeset 6654.
> > > Does doing hg pull -u and doing make world take care of
installing
new> >
> > > tools and kernel/xen?
> >
> > 6654 is ancient history!  There have been over 60 checkins including
> > several from me  marked "PAE bug fix".
> >
> > You''ll need to do a ./install.sh to install new tools.
> >
> > Best,
> > Ian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >--
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-13 16:57 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

ISSUES: 

* Unable to create guest domains on PAE enabled machines with mem >= 4GB
* Bugzilla #209
* (reported by raj.subrahmanian@unisys.com)


September 13, 2005 using hg source as of:

changeset:   6761:89ed236b6b66a66e2f0b0fb977e48cd943ce9dc1
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Tue Sep 13 05:42:15 2005
summary:     Update ignores list for new xenstore binaries.

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
        
        Last good changeset for x86_32 (PAE not enabled):
        changeset:   6761:89ed236b6b66a66e2f0b0fb977e48cd943ce9dc1
        tag:         tip
        user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Tue Sep 13 05:42:15 2005
        summary:     Update ignores list for new xenstore binaries.
                
ISSUES: None

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains on machines with
        memory < 4GB
        * UNABLE TO CREATE guest domain on machine with memory = 4GB
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and guest domains,
        except machine with mem > 4Gb.

        Last good changeset for x86_32 (PAE not enabled):
        
        changeset:   6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
        tag:         tip
        parent:      6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
        parent:      6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
        user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
        summary:     merge?

ISSUES: 

        * UNABLE TO CREATE guest domain on machine with memory = 4GB
        * Bugzilla #209 -Problems creating DomUs with large memory
        system/PAEenabled
        * (reported by raj.subrahmanian@unisys.com)


        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs


        Last good changeset for x86_64 platforms:
        
        changeset:   6761:89ed236b6b66a66e2f0b0fb977e48cd943ce9dc1
        tag:         tip
        user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Tue Sep 13 05:42:15 2005
        summary:     Update ignores list for new xenstore binaries.
        
ISSUE(S): None



-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-15 19:27 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

ISSUES: 

* Unable to create guest domains on PAE enabled machines with mem >= 4GB
* Same machine, non-PAE enabled works fine.
* Bugzilla #209

September 15, 2005 using hg source as of:

changeset:   6874:c27431cf81f96a6d98c4e25bd08e6762918019e4
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Thu Sep 15 08:17:24 2005
summary:     Fix the libxc Makefile.

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs
        
        changeset:   6874:c27431cf81f96a6d98c4e25bd08e6762918019e4
        tag:         tip
        user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Thu Sep 15 08:17:24 2005
        summary:     Fix the libxc Makefile.
                
ISSUES: None

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains on machines with
        memory < 4GB
        * UNABLE TO CREATE guest domain on machine with memory = 4GB
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and guest domains,
        except machine with mem > 4Gb.

        Last good changeset* for x86_32 (PAE):
        
        changeset:   6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
        tag:         tip
        parent:      6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
        parent:      6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
        user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
        summary:     merge?
	* for machines with mem >= 4GB. All others, current changeset OK

ISSUES: 

        * UNABLE TO CREATE guest domain on machine with memory = 4GB
        * Bugzilla #209 -Problems creating DomUs with large memory
        system/PAEenabled
        * (reported by raj.subrahmanian@unisys.com)


        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs


        Last good changeset for x86_64 platforms:
        
        changeset:   6874:c27431cf81f96a6d98c4e25bd08e6762918019e4
        tag:         tip
        user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Thu Sep 15 08:17:24 2005
        summary:     Fix the libxc Makefile.
      
ISSUE(S): None

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-16 17:41 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

ISSUES: 

* Unable to create guest domains on PAE enabled machines with mem >= 4GB
        * Using config file "/tmp/xen/vm1.cfg".
        * Error: Error creating domain: ''NoneType'' object has
no
        attribute ''port1''
* Test machine is IBM xSeries 335, SLES 9 SP2 based platform
* SCSI drives, 4GB physical memory
* Same machine, non-PAE enabled works fine.
* Bugzilla #209

September 16, 2005 using hg source as of:

Test changeset and last known good changeset for non-PAE enabled large
memory systems (>=4GB), x86_32 and x86_64:

changeset:   6885:e1cc553059e168baa594c8a855b05570a901198c
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Fri Sep 16 05:57:31 2005
summary:     direct_remap_pfn_range() takes a vm_area_struct rather than


x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP Dom0s and DomUs

ISSUES: None

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains on machines with
        memory < 4GB
        * UNABLE TO CREATE guest domain on machine with memory = 4GB
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and guest domains,
        except machine with mem > 4Gb.
	* Ran xm-test on 2 PAE enabled boxes (results below summary)

        Last good changeset* for x86_32 (PAE):
        
        changeset:   6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
        tag:         tip
        parent:      6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
        parent:      6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
        user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
        summary:     merge?
        * for machines with mem >= 4GB. All others, current changeset OK

ISSUES: 

        * UNABLE TO CREATE guest domain on machine with memory = 4GB
        * Bugzilla #209 -Problems creating DomUs with large memory
        system/PAEenabled
        * (reported by raj.subrahmanian@unisys.com)
       
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

      
ISSUE(S): None

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools. 

Results from IBM xSeries 335, PAE enabled, 4GB RAM, SLES 9 SP2 box:

Note: the failures reflect the inability to create a guest domain on
this machine, as mentioned report, Bugzilla #209. 

Xm-test execution summary:
  PASS:  28
  FAIL:  24
  XPASS: 0
  XFAIL: 3


Details:

XFAIL: 01_block-destroy_btblock_pos
         Unable to create domain

XFAIL: 01_block-destroy_btblock_pos
         Unable to create domain

XFAIL: 02_block-destroy_rtblock_pos
         Unable to create domain

 FAIL: 01_create_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 04_create_conflictname_neg
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 07_create_mem64_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 07_create_mem64_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 08_create_mem128_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 08_create_mem128_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 09_create_mem256_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 09_create_mem256_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 10_create_fastdestroy
         xm create returned invalid status 256

 FAIL: 10_create_fastdestroy
         xm create returned invalid status 256

 FAIL: 01_destroy_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 05_destroy_byid_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 04_list_goodparm_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 01_memset_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 03_memset_random_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 03_memset_random_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 01_pause_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 01_pause_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 01_reboot_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 01_reboot_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 02_reboot_badopt_neg
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 01_sedf_multi_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 01_sedf_multi_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 01_shutdown_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 01_shutdown_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 02_shutdown_badparm_neg
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 02_sysrq_sync_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 02_sysrq_sync_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 03_sysrq_withreboot_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 03_sysrq_withreboot_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 01_unpause_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 01_unpause_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 01_vcpu-disable_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

 FAIL: 01_vcpu-disable_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

XFAIL: 01_vcpu-pin_basic_pos
         Failed to create domain

----------------------------------------------------

Results from IBM ThinkCentre, 1GB RAM, FC3 box:

Xm-test execution summary:
  PASS:  45
  FAIL:  8
  XPASS: 1
  XFAIL: 2


Details:

XFAIL: 01_block-destroy_btblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

XFAIL: 01_block-destroy_btblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

XFAIL: 02_block-destroy_rtblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

 FAIL: 10_create_fastdestroy
         Bugzilla bug #234

 FAIL: 02_help_basic_neg
         Bugzilla bug #234

 FAIL: 01_reboot_basic_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 01_shutdown_basic_pos
         Guest domain failed to shutdown

 FAIL: 03_sysrq_withreboot_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)


-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-19 17:52 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

September 19, 2005 using hg source as of:

Test changeset and last known good changeset for non-PAE enabled large
memory systems (>=4GB), x86_32 and x86_64:

changeset:   6906:619e3d6f01b39042f287880572f0f0d92ac7996a
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Mon Sep 19 06:06:05 2005
summary:     Re-indent libxc to avoid hard tabs. Also, fix the PAE

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

ISSUES: None

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains on machines with
        memory < 4GB
        * UNABLE TO CREATE guest domain on machine with memory = 4GB
		* Keir Frasier working with us to debug
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and guest domains,
        except machine with mem > 4Gb.
        * Ran xm-test on 2 PAE enabled boxes (results below summary)

        Last good changeset* for x86_32 (PAE):
        
        changeset:   6699:cdfa7dd00c44eaa68b56656d236df5a60df17cf7
        tag:         tip
        parent:      6698:2704a88c329598a92bc349869df461363e509b8f
        parent:      6696:df1348e72390866e232f867be396962058d2f5b6
        user:        cl349@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
        date:        Fri Sep  9 05:20:25 2005
        summary:     merge?
        * for machines with mem >= 4GB. All others, current changeset OK

ISSUES: 

        * UNABLE TO CREATE guest domain on machine with memory = 4GB
        * Bugzilla #209 -Problems creating DomUs with large memory
        system/PAEenabled
        * (reported by raj.subrahmanian@unisys.com)
	* Working with Keir Fraser to debug
       
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

      
ISSUE(S): None

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools. 

Results from IBM xSeries 335, PAE enabled, 4GB RAM, SLES 9 SP2 box:

Note: the failures reflect the inability to create a guest domain on
this machine, as mentioned report, Bugzilla #209. 

Xm-test execution summary:
  PASS:  37
  FAIL:  15
  XPASS: 0
  XFAIL: 3


Details:

XFAIL: 01_block-destroy_btblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

XFAIL: 01_block-destroy_btblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

XFAIL: 02_block-destroy_rtblock_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 01_create_basic_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 04_create_conflictname_neg
         xm create let me create a duplicate-named domain!

 FAIL: 09_create_mem256_pos
         Failed to verify that a 256MB domain started

 FAIL: 09_create_mem256_pos
         Failed to verify that a 256MB domain started

 FAIL: 10_create_fastdestroy
         Bugzilla bug #234

 FAIL: 05_destroy_byid_pos
         xm destroy returned invalid 256 != 0

 FAIL: 01_memset_basic_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 01_pause_basic_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 01_pause_basic_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 01_reboot_basic_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 01_sedf_multi_pos
         [0] xm sedf returned invalid 256 != 0

 FAIL: 01_sedf_multi_pos
         [0] xm sedf returned invalid 256 != 0

 FAIL: 01_shutdown_basic_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 02_sysrq_sync_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 01_vcpu-disable_basic_pos
        Unknown reason

 FAIL: 01_vcpu-disable_basic_pos
        Unknown reason

XFAIL: 01_vcpu-pin_basic_pos
         xm vcpu-pin returned invalid 256 != 0


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Results from FC3, PAE enabled machine:

Xm-test execution summary:
  PASS:  48
  FAIL:  4
  XPASS: 1
  XFAIL: 2


Details:

XFAIL: 01_block-destroy_btblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

XFAIL: 01_block-destroy_btblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

XFAIL: 02_block-destroy_rtblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

 FAIL: 10_create_fastdestroy
         Bugzilla bug #234

 FAIL: 03_memset_random_pos
         Timed out waiting for console


-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-20 18:07 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

September 19, 2005 using hg source as of:

Test changeset and last known good changeset for ALL platforms:

changeset:   6963:1bea937e53cc
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Tue Sep 20 11:13:01 2005 +0000


x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

ISSUES: None

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
	* Ran xm-test on SLES 9 and FC3 boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ** The problem with creating a guest domain on 4GB or greater
        machines has been fixed

ISSUES: None

             
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

      
ISSUE(S): None

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools. 

Results from IBM xSeries 335, PAE enabled, 4GB RAM, SLES 9 SP2 box:

Xm-test execution summary:
  PASS:  39
  FAIL:  13
  XPASS: 0
  XFAIL: 3


Details:

XFAIL: 01_block-destroy_btblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

XFAIL: 01_block-destroy_btblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

XFAIL: 02_block-destroy_rtblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

 FAIL: 01_create_basic_pos
         Timed out waiting for console

 FAIL: 10_create_fastdestroy
         Bugzilla bug #234

 FAIL: 05_destroy_byid_pos
         xm destroy returned invalid 256 != 0

 FAIL: 03_memset_random_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 03_memset_random_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 01_pause_basic_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 01_pause_basic_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 01_reboot_basic_pos
         xm reboot returned 256 != 0

 FAIL: 01_shutdown_basic_pos
         Guest domain failed to shutdown

 FAIL: 02_sysrq_sync_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 01_unpause_basic_pos
         Failed to read from console (fd=3)

 FAIL: 01_vcpu-disable_basic_pos
        Unknown reason

 FAIL: 01_vcpu-disable_basic_pos
        Unknown reason

XFAIL: 01_vcpu-pin_basic_pos
         xm vcpu-pin returned invalid 256 != 0



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Results from FC3, PAE enabled machine:

Xm-test execution summary:
  PASS:  49
  FAIL:  3
  XPASS: 1
  XFAIL: 2


Details:

XFAIL: 01_block-destroy_btblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

XFAIL: 01_block-destroy_btblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

XFAIL: 02_block-destroy_rtblock_pos
         block-detach returned invalid 256 != 0

 FAIL: 10_create_fastdestroy
         Bugzilla bug #234




-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-21 18:43 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

September 21, 2005 using hg source as of:

Test changeset and last known good* changeset for ALL platforms:

changeset:   6967:7a45b8ccef01
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Wed Sep 21 05:13:11 2005 +0000
summary:     Some cleanup in tpm-related files.

* With some tool issues

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
	* Ran xm-test on SLES 9 box
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

ISSUES: None

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on SLES 9 and FC3 boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

  

ISSUES: 
        * Unable to save guest domain, Bugzilla #244

             
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
	* Ran xm-test on SLES 9 boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

      
ISSUE(S): * UnicodeError: label too long, Bugzilla #245

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools. 

SUMMARY:

            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   50 |    3 |     1 |     2 |
       hs20S9-x86_64 |   40 |   13 |     1 |     2 |
        x305S9nonpae |   47 |    5 |     1 |     2 |
          x335pae4gb |   42 |   10 |     1 |     2 |

Attached xm-test results files (*.report)
-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Sep-22 18:29 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

September 22, 2005 using hg source as of:

Test changeset and last known good* changeset for ALL platforms:

changeset:   6997:932aa2b425e8
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Thu Sep 22 08:36:20 2005 +0100
summary:     Netfront/back always use grant tables now. This cleans up a


* With some tool issues. Changeset 6999 has a fix for [Bug 249] Invalid state
record -- pfn count out of range: 268435456, but it hasn''t been tested
yet.

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
	* Ran xm-test on SLES 9 box
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

ISSUES: None

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on SLES 9 and FC3 boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

  

ISSUES: 
        * Unable to save guest domain, Bugzilla #249**
	** Reportedly fixed but not tested yet

             
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
	* Ran xm-test on SLES 9 boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

      
ISSUE(S): 	

        * Unable to save guest domain, Bugzilla #249**
        ** Reportedly fixed but not tested yet

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools. 

SUMMARY:

            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   50 |    3 |     1 |     2 |
       hs20S9-x86_64 |   40 |   13 |     1 |     2 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   50 |   11 |     0 |     5 |
          x305rh4pae |   50 |   10 |     0 |     5 |
        x305S9nonpae |   47 |    5 |     1 |     2 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   51 |    9 |     0 |     5 |
          x335fc4pae |   51 |   10 |     0 |     5 |
          x335pae4gb |   28 |   24 |     0 |     3 |


Attached xm-test results files (*.report)

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                              Euripides











_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-03 18:19 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

October 3, 2005 using hg source as of:

Test changeset:

changeset:   7160:dd87869f877c
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Mon Oct  3 09:05:37 2005 +0100
summary:     Allow adjustment of the size of TPM transfer buffers

x86_32 (no PAE support)

       * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
       * Builds and boots without problems
       * Able to create fully functional guest domains
       * Ran xm-test on all boxes
       * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: None observed

x86_32 (PAE)

       * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
       ThinkCentre
       * Builds and boots without problems
       * Able to create fully functional guest domains
       * Ran xm-test on all boxes
       * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains

 
        ISSUES:  
        * Bugzilla Bug 257 -(XEN) Ouch! We are seriously BEHIND
        schedule! -456776755
        * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
        * Bugzilla Bug 268 - ERROR: do_evtchn_op:
        HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op failed: -1


x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

       * Builds and boots without problems
       * Able to create fully functional guest domains
       * Ran xm-test on both boxes
       * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: None observed
       

      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   57 |    8 |     0 |     3 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   49 |   16 |     0 |     3 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   49 |   16 |     0 |     3 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   50 |   15 |     0 |     3 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   58 |    7 |     0 |     3 |
          x305rh4pae |   56 |    7 |     0 |     3 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   55 |    8 |     0 |     3 |


-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides








_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-04 17:52 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

October 4, 2005 using hg source as of:

Test changeset:

changeset:   7195:ec84b119e4ed
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Tue Oct  4 09:02:51 2005 +0100
summary:     Allow EVTCHNOP_bind_{ipi,virq} to specify the vcpu to

x86_32 (no PAE support)

       * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
       * Builds and boots without problems
       * Able to create fully functional guest domains
       * Ran xm-test on all boxes
       * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 

x86_32 (PAE)

       * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
       ThinkCentre
       * Builds and boots without problems
       * Able to create fully functional guest domains
       * Ran xm-test on all boxes
       * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains

 
        ISSUES:  
	* Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
        * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
        * Bugzilla Bug 268 - ERROR: do_evtchn_op:
        HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op failed: -1
	* Bugzilla Bug 273    Could not get page ref for pfn 24a7


x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000 [1] 
	* Reopened 258       
       

      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   65 |    9 |     0 |     3 |
hs20.1.sles9-x86_64  |   56 |   16 |     0 |     3 |
hs20.2.sles9-x86_64  |   56 |   16 |     0 |     3 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   64 |   10 |     0 |     3 |
          x305rh4pae |   14 |   57 |     0 |     3 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   61 |    9 |     0 |     3 |
          x335fc4pae |   16 |   56 |     0 |     3 |
    x335sles9_pae4gb |    5 |   67 |     0 |     3 |


-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides









_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-05 18:22 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

October 5, 2005 using hg source as of:

Test changeset:

changeset:   7206:c60036fe7418
tag:         tip
user:        emellor@ewan
date:        Wed Oct  5 05:43:23 2005 +0100
summary:     Removed the EventServer, replacing the events fired with simple
logging

x86_32 (no PAE support)

       * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
       * Builds and boots without problems
       * Able to create fully functional guest domains
       * Ran xm-test on all boxes
       * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: None observed.

x86_32 (PAE)

       * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
       ThinkCentre
       * Builds and boots without problems
       * Able to create fully functional guest domains
       * Ran xm-test on all boxes
       * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains

 
        ISSUES:  
	* Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
        * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:


x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000 [1]      
      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   64 |    8 |     0 |     3 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   17 |   55 |     0 |     3 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   57 |   15 |     0 |     3 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   65 |    7 |     0 |     3 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   67 |    5 |     0 |     3 |
          x305rh4pae |   64 |    6 |     0 |     3 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   65 |    5 |     0 |     3 |
          x335fc4pae |   17 |   55 |     0 |     3 |
    x335sles9_pae4gb |    3 |   69 |     0 |     3 |


-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides










_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-06 17:54 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

October 6, 2005 using hg source as of:

Test changeset:

changeset:   7234:bd37123974b2
tag:         tip
parent:      7233:4ab4f023a6ce
parent:      7228:ba0bbf9d29ff
user:        emellor@ewan
date:        Thu Oct  6 05:12:55 2005 +0100
summary:     Merged.


x86_32 (no PAE support)

       * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
       * Builds and boots without problems
       * Able to create fully functional guest domains
       * Ran xm-test on all boxes
       * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: None observed.

x86_32 (PAE)

       * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
       ThinkCentre
       * Builds and boots without problems
       * Able to create fully functional guest domains
       * Ran xm-test on all boxes
       * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains

 
        ISSUES:  
	* Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
	* Bugzilla Bug 265 - Time stood still
		* Machine in ''semi comatose state''
        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000 [1]      
      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY:

            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   67 |    5 |     0 |     3 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   57 |   15 |     0 |     3 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   57 |   15 |     0 |     3 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   65 |    7 |     0 |     3 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   68 |    4 |     0 |     3 |
          x305rh4pae |   65 |    5 |     0 |     3 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   66 |    4 |     0 |     3 |
          x335fc4pae |   67 |    5 |     0 |     3 |


-- Regards, David F Barrera Linux Technology Center Systems and 
Technology Group, IBM "The wisest men follow their own direction. " 
Euripides












_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-07 17:09 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

October 7, 2005 using hg source as of:

Test changeset:

changeset:   7249:5eda9308b0ca
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Fri Oct  7 05:54:38 2005 +0100
summary:     Remove bind_evtchn_to_irq/unbind_evtchn_from_irq from the

x86_32 (no PAE support)

       * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
       * Builds and boots without problems
       * Able to create fully functional guest domains
       * Ran xm-test on all boxes
       * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
       * Bugzilla Bug 186 - xm console hangs after migrate
	

x86_32 (PAE)

       * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
       ThinkCentre
       * Builds and boots without problems
       * Able to create fully functional guest domains
       * Ran xm-test on all boxes
       * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains

 
        ISSUES:  
	* Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
	* Bugzilla Bug 265 - Time stood still
		* Machine in ''semi comatose state''
        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000 [1]      
      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   76 |   10 |     0 |     1 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   66 |   20 |     0 |     1 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   66 |   20 |     0 |     1 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   73 |   13 |     0 |     1 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   74 |   12 |     0 |     1 |
          x305rh4pae |   75 |   10 |     0 |     1 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   75 |   10 |     0 |     1 |
          x335fc4pae |   76 |   10 |     0 |     1 |


-- Regards, 

David F Barrera 
Linux Technology Center 
Systems and Technology Group, IBM 

"The wisest men follow their own direction. " 
				Euripides







_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-10 21:09 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Test changeset:

changeset:   7293:0f33cbec4e36
tag:         tip
user:        emellor@ewan
date:        Mon Oct 10 13:06:14 2005 +0100
summary:     This patch fixes an error in the xm create path when the

Last known good changeset for all platforms: 7069:a172340ae3f3

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
	* Bugzilla Bug 302 - Destination host of migration crashes
	* Bugzilla Bug 284 - Could not allocate order=0 extent: id=11 flags=0

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains
 
        ISSUES:  
	* Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
	* Bugzilla Bug 265 - Time stood still
		* Machine in ''semi comatose state''
	* Bugzilla Bug 284 - Could not allocate order=0 extent: id=11 flags=0
        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000 [1]      
      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   64 |   30 |     0 |     1 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   62 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   62 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   63 |   31 |     0 |     1 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   64 |   28 |     0 |     1 |
          x305rh4pae |   63 |   30 |     0 |     1 |
          x335fc4pae |   53 |   39 |     0 |     1 |


-- Regards, 

David F Barrera 
Linux Technology Center 
Systems and Technology Group, IBM 

"The wisest men follow their own direction. " 
				Euripides










_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Anthony Liguori

2005-Oct-10 21:21 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

David F Barrera wrote:
>Test changeset:
>
>changeset:   7293:0f33cbec4e36
>tag:         tip
>user:        emellor@ewan
>date:        Mon Oct 10 13:06:14 2005 +0100
>summary:     This patch fixes an error in the xm create path when the
>
>Last known good changeset for all platforms: 7069:a172340ae3f3
>  
><snip>
>xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
>tools.
>
>SUMMARY:
>            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
>---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
>              FC3pae |   64 |   30 |     0 |     1 |
> hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   62 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
> hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   62 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
>     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   63 |   31 |     0 |     1 |
>     x235sles9nonpae |   64 |   28 |     0 |     1 |
>          x305rh4pae |   63 |   30 |     0 |     1 |
>          x335fc4pae |   53 |   39 |     0 |     1 |
>
>  
>This is a lot of failures.

Is it perhaps wise, nearing 3.0, that we adopt a policy of running the 
various test suites on code before it gets pushed to the public tree?  
This seems like requiring passing on xm-test a sane thing to do for the 
tools related changes.  Is there anything that needs to be done to the 
test suites to make this less painful for the committers?

Just to clarify, I''m suggesting that all changes should be checked 
(external patches or Cambridge pushes) against the testsuites before 
committing.  Just seems like it would be a good way to ensure that we 
avoid regressing as we near 3.0 release.

I don''t think anyone is particularly at fault for the recent 
regressions, I just think it''s time we adopt a more rigorious commit
policy.

Thoughts?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori
>-- Regards, 
>
>David F Barrera 
>Linux Technology Center 
>Systems and Technology Group, IBM 
>
>"The wisest men follow their own direction. " 
>				Euripides
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ryan Harper

2005-Oct-10 21:28 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

* Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> [2005-10-10
16:22]:> David F Barrera wrote:
> 
> >Test changeset:
> >
> >changeset:   7293:0f33cbec4e36
> >tag:         tip
> >user:        emellor@ewan
> >date:        Mon Oct 10 13:06:14 2005 +0100
> >summary:     This patch fixes an error in the xm create path when the
> >
> >Last known good changeset for all platforms: 7069:a172340ae3f3
> > 
> >
> <snip>
> 
> >xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
> >tools.
> >
> >SUMMARY:
> >           Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> >---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
> >             FC3pae |   64 |   30 |     0 |     1 |
> >hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   62 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
> >hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   62 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
> >    hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   63 |   31 |     0 |     1 |
> >    x235sles9nonpae |   64 |   28 |     0 |     1 |
> >         x305rh4pae |   63 |   30 |     0 |     1 |
> >         x335fc4pae |   53 |   39 |     0 |     1 |
> >
> > 
> >
> This is a lot of failures.
> 
> Is it perhaps wise, nearing 3.0, that we adopt a policy of running the 
> various test suites on code before it gets pushed to the public tree?  
> This seems like requiring passing on xm-test a sane thing to do for the 
> tools related changes.  Is there anything that needs to be done to the 
> test suites to make this less painful for the committers?
> 
> Just to clarify, I''m suggesting that all changes should be checked
> (external patches or Cambridge pushes) against the testsuites before 
> committing.  Just seems like it would be a good way to ensure that we 
> avoid regressing as we near 3.0 release.
> 
> I don''t think anyone is particularly at fault for the recent 
> regressions, I just think it''s time we adopt a more rigorious
commit policy.
I think this is a fantastic idea.  Certainly worth running a before and
after patch applied and compare results.

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@us.ibm.com

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Dan Smith

2005-Oct-10 21:32 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

AL> Thoughts?

I think such a policy would definitely be beneficial to the stability
of tree.  The error in the changeset I just emailed about would have
been caught by a quick run of xm-test before commit :)

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms@us.ibm.com


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Nivedita Singhvi

2005-Oct-10 21:32 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Is it perhaps wise, nearing 3.0, that we adopt a policy of running the 
> various test suites on code before it gets pushed to the public tree?  
> This seems like requiring passing on xm-test a sane thing to do for the 
> tools related changes.  Is there anything that needs to be done to the 
> test suites to make this less painful for the committers?
> 
> Just to clarify, I''m suggesting that all changes should be checked
> (external patches or Cambridge pushes) against the testsuites before 
> committing.  Just seems like it would be a good way to ensure that we 
> avoid regressing as we near 3.0 release.
Yep, agree. That will be an additional incentive to get tests up to
speed asap before continuing further work.

thanks,
Nivedita



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ian Pratt

2005-Oct-11 15:10 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

> Is it perhaps wise, nearing 3.0, that we adopt a policy of 
> running the various test suites on code before it gets pushed 
> to the public tree?  
> This seems like requiring passing on xm-test a sane thing to 
> do for the tools related changes.  Is there anything that 
> needs to be done to the test suites to make this less painful 
> for the committers?
We''ve been working towards getting XenRT integrated in our changeset
release system, and are hoping to go live in the next couple of days.
It''s a shame we didn''t have it for yesterday''s
hickup, but too bad.

Every check-in will automatically trigger a run of the XenRT
''fast'' test
suite. This will result in it being built, booted, and undergoing
various tests (including xm-test). Only changesets that pass on all of
x86_32, x86_32p and x86_64 will be pushed out from the staging area to
the public xenbits.xensource.com repository. The fast test suite takes
about one hour to run.

This should put an end to changesets that have obvious faults escaping
into the wild. 

The longer XenRT test suites will still be run on every nightly snapshot
(and reported to xenbits.xensource.com/xenrt)

Best,
Ian




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Anthony Liguori

2005-Oct-11 15:22 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Ian Pratt wrote:
> 
>  
>
>>Is it perhaps wise, nearing 3.0, that we adopt a policy of 
>>running the various test suites on code before it gets pushed 
>>to the public tree?  
>>This seems like requiring passing on xm-test a sane thing to 
>>do for the tools related changes.  Is there anything that 
>>needs to be done to the test suites to make this less painful 
>>for the committers?
>>    
>>
>
>We''ve been working towards getting XenRT integrated in our
changeset
>release system, and are hoping to go live in the next couple of days.
>It''s a shame we didn''t have it for yesterday''s
hickup, but too bad.
>
>Every check-in will automatically trigger a run of the XenRT
''fast'' test
>suite. This will result in it being built, booted, and undergoing
>various tests (including xm-test). Only changesets that pass on all of
>x86_32, x86_32p and x86_64 will be pushed out from the staging area to
>the public xenbits.xensource.com repository. The fast test suite takes
>about one hour to run.
>  
>Excellent!  Thanks Ian.

Let us know if there''s anything we can do to help speed this along.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori
>This should put an end to changesets that have obvious faults escaping
>into the wild. 
>
>The longer XenRT test suites will still be run on every nightly snapshot
>(and reported to xenbits.xensource.com/xenrt)
>
>Best,
>Ian
>
>
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ian Pratt

2005-Oct-11 15:45 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

> >Every check-in will automatically trigger a run of the XenRT
''fast''
> >test suite. This will result in it being built, booted, and 
> undergoing 
> >various tests (including xm-test). Only changesets that pass 
> on all of 
> >x86_32, x86_32p and x86_64 will be pushed out from the 
> staging area to 
> >the public xenbits.xensource.com repository. The fast test 
> suite takes 
> >about one hour to run.
> Excellent!  Thanks Ian.
James Bulpin takes all the credit for this.
 > Let us know if there''s anything we can do to help speed this
along.
Well, one thing we will need to watchout for is checkins to xm-test that
add tests that currently fail. When this happens (and I don''t want to
discourage this), please give us a heads-up so that we can make sure we
use an older snapshot of xm-test for the verification process.
(Otherwise the changelog mailing list is likely to go strangely quiet
:-)

Thanks,
Ian  

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Dan Smith

2005-Oct-11 16:58 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

IP> Well, one thing we will need to watchout for is checkins to
IP> xm-test that add tests that currently fail.

Do you mean tests that exercise things that we know don''t work at the
moment?  Would it be sufficient to make sure that those tests are
marked as XFAIL?

I''m very glad to hear about the automated testing-before-pushing
plans.  It sounds great!

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms@us.ibm.com


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-11 17:07 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Heads up: build breaks on x86_64 and FC4 x86.

October 11, 2005 using test changeset:

changeset:   7308:959d33fbd660
tag:         tip
user:        jrb44@freefall.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Tue Oct 11 08:26:23 2005 +0100
summary:     Added xsls to xenstore Makefile install dependencies to fix
"make dist".

Last known good changeset* for all platforms: 7069:a172340ae3f3

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 302 - Destination host of migration crashes
        * Bugzilla Bug 284 - Could not allocate order=0 extent: id=11
flags=0

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on non FC4 boxes boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains
* BUILD BREAK on FC4
 
        ISSUES:  
        * Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
        * Bugzilla Bug 265 - Time stood still
        * Bugzilla Bug 284 - Could not allocate order=0 extent: id=11
        flags=0
        * Bugzilla Bug 314 - *Build Break* - x86 FC4 - xsls.c:28:
        warning: field precision is not type int (arg 2)
        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * BUILD BREAK

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 313    Build Break - x86_64 SLES 9 - xsls.c:28:
        warning: field precision is not type int (arg 2)
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000 [1] -
        Unable to verify today due to build break. Likely unresolved.  
      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
     x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
          x305rh4pae |   76 |   11 |     0 |     1 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   76 |    9 |     0 |     1 |

Unable to run xm-test on other machines due to build breaks, Bugzilla
#313 and #314.

* With some minor issues with tools, such as ''xm save''.

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ted Kaczmarek

2005-Oct-11 20:15 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 09:58 -0700, Dan Smith wrote:> IP> Well, one thing we will need to watchout for is checkins to
> IP> xm-test that add tests that currently fail.
> 
> Do you mean tests that exercise things that we know don''t work at
the
> moment?  Would it be sufficient to make sure that those tests are
> marked as XFAIL?
> 
> I''m very glad to hear about the automated testing-before-pushing
> plans.  It sounds great!
I second that :-)

Regards,
Ted




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Nicholas Lee

2005-Oct-11 20:42 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

On 10/11/05, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
wrote:> Is it perhaps wise, nearing 3.0, that we adopt a policy of running the
> various test suites on code before it gets pushed to the public tree?
Can we expect there to be a some sort of freeze on 3.0 soon?

As a user its hard to tell at the moment if new features are still
being developed and added to 3.0 or we are chasing bugs.

The idea that a freeze and focus for release is occurring soon, would
make the time I''m spending testing Xen 3.0 on a machine I want to put
into production at some point is worth while.

I''m working under the assumption that 3.0 has been projected to be
release soon so its on a spiral to being stable. Otherwise, maybe I''ll
just go back 2.0 and wait 6 months.


--
Nicholas Lee
http://stateless.geek.nz
gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF  5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Anthony Liguori

2005-Oct-11 22:07 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Nicholas Lee wrote:
>On 10/11/05, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>Is it perhaps wise, nearing 3.0, that we adopt a policy of running the
>>various test suites on code before it gets pushed to the public tree?
>>    
>>
>  
>Ian''s obviously the best person to answer this but I''ll give
it a go.
>Can we expect there to be a some sort of freeze on 3.0 soon?
>  
>We are sort of already in a testing freeze.  There''s a lot of activity 
in the tree because some broken things are being reworked.  2.0 => 3.0 
was a pretty significant change in many parts of Xen.

A lot changes being made now have associated bugzilla reports.  This 
will likely become the more common case as we move forward.
>As a user its hard to tell at the moment if new features are still
>being developed and added to 3.0 or we are chasing bugs.
>  
>Yeah, there''s a lot of churn in the tree.  Most of it is chasing bugs.
>The idea that a freeze and focus for release is occurring soon, would
>make the time I''m spending testing Xen 3.0 on a machine I want to
put
>into production at some point is worth while.
>
>I''m working under the assumption that 3.0 has been projected to be
>release soon so its on a spiral to being stable. Otherwise, maybe
I''ll
>just go back 2.0 and wait 6 months.
>  
>This is Open Source.  Soon is when-it''s-ready.  6 months is probably a 
safe bet.  I would hold your breath to see a release in the next 1-2 
months though.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori
>--
>Nicholas Lee
>http://stateless.geek.nz
>gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF  5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ian Pratt

2005-Oct-11 22:16 UTC

head link

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

> IP> Well, one thing we will need to watchout for is checkins 
> to xm-test 
> IP> that add tests that currently fail.
> 
> Do you mean tests that exercise things that we know don''t 
> work at the moment?  Would it be sufficient to make sure that 
> those tests are marked as XFAIL?
Yes, should work nicely.

Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Nicholas Lee

2005-Oct-11 22:31 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

On 10/12/05, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> This is Open Source.  Soon is when-it''s-ready.  6 months is
probably a
> safe bet.  I would hold your breath to see a release in the next 1-2
> months though.
Right, I figured that. Its good to know though that we are on the
spiral to stable.

I don''t mind running unstable, since we all know that unstable in
Linux land often is the same as SP1 in Windows land. Furthermore, with
OSS we can find out who to hassle. ;)

Problem I''m seeing is I''m not keen to pull a machine in 6
months to
upgrade to 3.0.  From the looks of things it not going to be easy to
both upgrade to 64bit userland and Xen 3.0 remotely for dom0. (*) 
Even though the Xen 2.0  kernel config has an option of x68_64 I
haven''t seen anywhere that this works, so 32bit Xen 2.0 seems the only
option.

Finding a good changeset to test and run with should be ok, the main
issue with running Xen I find is the tight coupling between the Xen
userland, kernel and Xen micro kernel.  With a natural kernel you can
install a new kernel config, break it and revert easily via a serial
console.  With Xen its hard to tell if one set of userland/python xm
tools will work with another kernel.

(*) Problem seems to be: Need 64bit python to talk to 64bit Xen. Need
to install 64bit kernel to get 64bit python.

--
Nicholas Lee
http://stateless.geek.nz
gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF  5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-12 18:47 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

October 12, 2005 using test changeset:

changeset:   7344:ffbee4415bf7
tag:         tip
user:        emellor@ewan
date:        Wed Oct 12 06:04:45 2005 +0100
summary:     Explicitly state which architectures are going to
use /usr/lib64, to allow for

Last known good changeset* for all platforms: 7069:a172340ae3f3

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 302 - Destination host (dom0) of migration
        crashes
        * Bugzilla Bug 317 - Guest domains dying
       

x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all FC4 boxes boxes
		* FC4 PAE enabled box: Bug #265 - Time stood still
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains
* BUILD BREAK on FC4
 
        ISSUES:  
        * Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
        * Bugzilla Bug 265 - Time stood still
	* Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
        
        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * BUILD BREAK

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000 [1] -

      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   78 |   10 |     0 |     1 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   55 |   33 |     0 |     1 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   66 |   20 |     0 |     1 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   56 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
          x305rh4pae |   76 |   11 |     0 |     1 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   53 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
          x335fc4pae |   64 |   24 |     0 |     1 |



* With some minor issues with tools, such as ''xm save''.

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides









_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-12 18:53 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

I need to correct the report. The build break on x86_64 has been
corrected. 

The x86_64 section shoul read like this:

x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000 [1]  

On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 13:47 -0500, David F Barrera
wrote:> October 12, 2005 using test changeset:
> 
> changeset:   7344:ffbee4415bf7
> tag:         tip
> user:        emellor@ewan
> date:        Wed Oct 12 06:04:45 2005 +0100
> summary:     Explicitly state which architectures are going to
> use /usr/lib64, to allow for
> 
> Last known good changeset* for all platforms: 7069:a172340ae3f3
> 
> x86_32 (no PAE support)
> 
>         * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
>         * Builds and boots without problems
>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>         * Ran xm-test on all boxes
>         * Ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs
> 
>         ISSUES: 
>         * Bugzilla Bug 302 - Destination host (dom0) of migration
>         crashes
>         * Bugzilla Bug 317 - Guest domains dying
>        
> 
> x86_32 (PAE)
> 
>         * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
>         ThinkCentre
>         * Builds and boots without problems
>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>         * Ran xm-test on all FC4 boxes boxes
> 		* FC4 PAE enabled box: Bug #265 - Time stood still
>         * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains
> * BUILD BREAK on FC4
>  
>         ISSUES:  
>         * Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
>         * Bugzilla Bug 265 - Time stood still
> 	* Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
>         
>         
> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
> 
>         * BUILD BREAK
> 
>         ISSUES: 
>         * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000 [1] -
> 
>       
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------
> 
> xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
> tools.
> 
> SUMMARY:
>             Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
>               FC3pae |   78 |   10 |     0 |     1 |
>  hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   55 |   33 |     0 |     1 |
>  hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   66 |   20 |     0 |     1 |
>      hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   56 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
>      x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
>           x305rh4pae |   76 |   11 |     0 |     1 |
>      x305sles9nonpae |   53 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
>           x335fc4pae |   64 |   24 |     0 |     1 |
> 
> 
> 
> * With some minor issues with tools, such as ''xm save''.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Dan Smith

2005-Oct-12 19:36 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Just a comment about these results:
>             Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
>               FC3pae |   78 |   10 |     0 |     1 |
>  hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   55 |   33 |     0 |     1 |
>  hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   66 |   20 |     0 |     1 |
>      hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   56 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
>      x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
>           x305rh4pae |   76 |   11 |     0 |     1 |
>      x305sles9nonpae |   53 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
>           x335fc4pae |   64 |   24 |     0 |     1 |
The above list of PASS/FAIL results was generated with an old version
of xm-test because I forgot to update the link that David pulls from
last night.  In tomorrow''s report, we should see fewer failures, and
most marked as expected.

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms@us.ibm.com


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-13 18:09 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

October 13, 2005 using test changeset:

changeset:   7353:29db5bded574
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Wed Oct 12 10:15:02 2005 +0100
summary:     Fix 64-bit compile warnings in firmware.

Last known good changeset for all platforms: 7069:a172340ae3f3

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 302 - Destination host of migration crashes
       
x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains
 
        ISSUES:  
        * Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
        * Bugzilla Bug 265 - Time stood still
                * Machines end up in ''semi comatose state''
        * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
        
        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * None observed today; however, 	* Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 -
        general protection fault: 0000 [1] may still be unresolved. In
        the past, it has shown up one day an not the next, so I am
        keeping it open.

       
      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY*:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   77 |   12 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   60 |   27 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   59 |   28 |     1 |     7 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   78 |   11 |     2 |     6 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
          x305rh4pae |   79 |    9 |     3 |     5 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   53 |   32 |     0 |     1 |

*The xSeries 335s were unable to complete xm-test due to Bugzilla Bug
265 - Time stood still. Both machines had to be manually reset.

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides







_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-13 19:27 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 12:36 -0700, Dan Smith wrote:> Just a comment about these results:
> 
> >             Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> > ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
> >               FC3pae |   78 |   10 |     0 |     1 |
> >  hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   55 |   33 |     0 |     1 |
> >  hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   66 |   20 |     0 |     1 |
> >      hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   56 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
> >      x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
> >           x305rh4pae |   76 |   11 |     0 |     1 |
> >      x305sles9nonpae |   53 |   32 |     0 |     1 |
> >           x335fc4pae |   64 |   24 |     0 |     1 |
> 
> The above list of PASS/FAIL results was generated with an old version
> of xm-test because I forgot to update the link that David pulls from
> last night.  In tomorrow''s report, we should see fewer failures,
and
> most marked as expected.Dan,

Are we seeing fewer failure? It appears to be similar, or slightly more.

SUMMARY*:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   77 |   12 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   60 |   27 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   59 |   28 |     1 |     7 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   78 |   11 |     2 |     6 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   77 |    9 |     0 |     1 |
          x305rh4pae |   79 |    9 |     3 |     5 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   53 |   32 |     0 |     1 |> -- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Dan Smith

2005-Oct-13 19:36 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

DB> Are we seeing fewer failure? It appears to be similar, or slightly
DB> more.

Mostly what I meant was that there are fewer FAILs and more XFAILs,
which there are.  Also, on my machines, I''m seeing almost no
unexpected failures.  See my machine''s latest report:

  http://xmtest.dague.org/cgi-bin/display?view=single&testid=99

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms@us.ibm.com


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Ewan Mellor

2005-Oct-13 22:41 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:36:25PM -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
> 
> DB> Are we seeing fewer failure? It appears to be similar, or slightly
> DB> more.
> 
> Mostly what I meant was that there are fewer FAILs and more XFAILs,
> which there are.  Also, on my machines, I''m seeing almost no
> unexpected failures.  See my machine''s latest report:
> 
>   http://xmtest.dague.org/cgi-bin/display?view=single&testid=99
Looking at this test result, I think that 07_attach_baddevice_neg and
08_attach_bad_filedevice_neg are going to stay XFAIL for some time, but the
patch that I gave you today should sort out the other failures, which will
mean that we pass every other test in your suite.  Which is nice.

This applies to 32-bit, non-PAE, non-SMP Xen -- other architectures will have
different results, at the moment.

Ewan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-14 18:37 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

October 14, 2005 using test changeset:

changeset:   7377:70aa62954e91
tag:         tip
user:        iap10@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Thu Oct 13 19:42:34 2005 +0100
summary:     Remove unused x86_64 functions.

Last known good changeset for all platforms: 7069:a172340ae3f3

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        
       
x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains
 
        ISSUES:  
        * Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
        * Bugzilla Bug 265 - Time stood still
                ** Ian Pratt reported today that the cause of this
                problem is understood and that a patch is in testing.
                Yay!                
	* Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
        
        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000
        [1]      
      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY*:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   68 |   22 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   61 |   27 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   60 |   28 |     1 |     7 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   78 |   12 |     2 |     6 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   68 |   20 |     2 |     6 |
          x305rh4pae |   81 |    8 |     3 |     5 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   80 |    7 |     1 |     7 |

*The xSeries 335s were unable to complete xm-test due to Bugzilla Bug
265 - Time stood still. Both machines had to be manually reset.

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides








_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-17 16:22 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

October 17, 2005 using test changeset:

changeset:   7396:9b51e7637676
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Sun Oct 16 11:25:15 2005 +0100
summary:     Clean up debug tracing in mm and mm audit code.

Last known good changeset for all platforms: 7396:9b51e7637676

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: None observed        
       
x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains
 
        ISSUES:  
        * Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
        * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
        
        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000
        [1]      
      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY*:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   66 |   24 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   56 |   34 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   59 |   29 |     1 |     7 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   78 |   12 |     2 |     6 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   80 |    8 |     2 |     6 |
          x305rh4pae |   78 |    9 |     2 |     6 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   79 |    8 |     2 |     6 |
          x335fc4pae |   65 |   25 |     2 |     6 |
    x335sles9_pae4gb |   65 |   25 |     2 |     6 |


-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides










_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-18 18:56 UTC

head link

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

xm-test results attached.

On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 14:50, David F Barrera wrote:> October 18, 2005 using test changeset:
> 
> changeset:   7398:446aa56ca4fe
> tag:         tip
> user:        emellor@leeni.uk.xensource.com
> date:        Mon Oct 17 07:50:28 2005 +0100
> summary:     Added a TRACE log level, for those versions of Python that
> do not have it, and
> 
> Last known good changeset for all platforms: 7396:9b51e7637676
> 
> x86_32 (no PAE support)
> 
>         * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
>         * Builds and boots without problems
>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>         * Ran xm-test on all boxes
>         * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs
> 
>         ISSUES: Bug 339 - peth0: received packet with own address as
>         source address
>        
> x86_32 (PAE)
> 
>         * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
>         ThinkCentre
>         * Builds and boots without problems
>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>         * Ran xm-test on all boxes
>         * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains
>  
>         ISSUES:  
>         * Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
>         * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
>         * Bug 339 - peth0: received packet with own address as source
>         address 
>         
>         
> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)
> 
>         * Builds and boots without problems
>         * Able to create fully functional guest domains
>         * Ran xm-test on both boxes
>         * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs
> 
>         ISSUES: 
>         * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000
>         [1]
> 	* Bugzilla Bug 166    UnicodeError: label too long (REOPENED)
>       
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------
> 
> xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
> tools.
> 
> SUMMARY:
>             Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
>               FC3pae |   65 |   23 |     2 |     6 |
>  hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |    0 |   88 |     0 |     8 | Bug #166
>  hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |    0 |   88 |     0 |     8 | Bug #166
>      hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   79 |   11 |     2 |     6 |
>      x235sles9nonpae |   67 |   21 |     2 |     6 |
>           x305rh4pae |   77 |   10 |     2 |     6 |
>      x305sles9nonpae |   79 |    8 |     2 |     6 |
>           x335fc4pae |   65 |   25 |     2 |     6 |
>     x335sles9_pae4gb |   76 |   14 |     2 |     6 |
> 









_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-18 19:50 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

October 18, 2005 using test changeset:

changeset:   7398:446aa56ca4fe
tag:         tip
user:        emellor@leeni.uk.xensource.com
date:        Mon Oct 17 07:50:28 2005 +0100
summary:     Added a TRACE log level, for those versions of Python that
do not have it, and

Last known good changeset for all platforms: 7396:9b51e7637676

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: Bug 339 - peth0: received packet with own address as
        source address
       
x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains
 
        ISSUES:  
        * Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
        * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
        * Bug 339 - peth0: received packet with own address as source
        address 
        
        
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000
        [1]
	* Bugzilla Bug 166    UnicodeError: label too long (REOPENED)
      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   65 |   23 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |    0 |   88 |     0 |     8 | Bug #166
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |    0 |   88 |     0 |     8 | Bug #166
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   79 |   11 |     2 |     6 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   67 |   21 |     2 |     6 |
          x305rh4pae |   77 |   10 |     2 |     6 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   79 |    8 |     2 |     6 |
          x335fc4pae |   65 |   25 |     2 |     6 |
    x335sles9_pae4gb |   76 |   14 |     2 |     6 |


-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-19 17:16 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

October 19, 2005 using test changeset:

changeset:   7422:4dd58ef39639
tag:         tip
user:        kaf24@firebug.cl.cam.ac.uk
date:        Wed Oct 19 01:43:03 2005 +0100
summary:     Rename 2.6.12.5 patch so it actually gets applied. Fail

Last known good changeset for all platforms: 7422:4dd58ef39639

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: Bug 339 - peth0: received packet with own address as
        source address
       
x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchon Dom0s and guest domains
 
        ISSUES:  
        * Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
        * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
        * Bug 339 - peth0: received packet with own address as source
        address 
        * Bugzilla Bug 317 - Guest domains [occasionally] dying (Seen
        last late yesterday, after report had gone out)
                
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000
        [1]
        * Bugzilla Bug 345 - xenconsoled[3321]: segfault at
        0000000000000008 rip 00000000004029ff rsp
       
      
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

xm-test: This suite provides a framework for testing the Xen userspace
tools.

SUMMARY:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   66 |   22 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   69 |   19 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   69 |   19 |     2 |     6 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   67 |   23 |     2 |     6 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   80 |    8 |     2 |     6 |
          x305rh4pae |   78 |    9 |     2 |     6 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   79 |    8 |     2 |     6 |
          x335fc4pae |   65 |   25 |     2 |     6 |
    x335sles9_pae4gb |   71 |   17 |     2 |     6 |

-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides










_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-20 18:23 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

October 20, 2005 using test changeset:

changeset:   7425:7c951e3eb5ab
tag:         tip
user:        emellor@leeni.uk.xensource.com
date:        Wed Oct 19 05:53:00 2005 +0100
summary:     Remove unused parameter from addControllerClass.  This
became unused when the

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: Bug 339 - peth0: received packet with own address as
        source address
       
x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and guest domains
 
        ISSUES:  
        * Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
        * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
        * Bug 339 - peth0: received packet with own address as source
        address 

                
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000
        [1]
        * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
        * Bugzilla Bug 339 - peth0: received packet with own address...
        
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------XM-TEST Results---------------------------------

SUMMARY:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
              FC3pae |   53 |   35 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   69 |   19 |     2 |     6 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   69 |   19 |     2 |     6 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   77 |   13 |     2 |     6 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   66 |   22 |     2 |     6 |
          x305rh4pae |   78 |    9 |     2 |     6 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   79 |    8 |     2 |     6 |
          x335fc4pae |   65 |   25 |     2 |     6 |
    x335sles9_pae4gb |   74 |   16 |     2 |     6 |


-- 
Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
                                                        Euripides










_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

David F Barrera

2005-Oct-21 15:58 UTC

head link

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

October 21, 2005 using test changeset:

changeset:   7425:7c951e3eb5ab*
tag:         tip
user:        emellor@leeni.uk.xensource.com
date:        Wed Oct 19 05:53:00 2005 +0100
summary:     Remove unused parameter from addControllerClass.  This
became unused when the

*Same changeset as yesterday, at 6.30AM CST today.

x86_32 (no PAE support)

        * SLES 9 SP2 on IBM xSeries 235 and 305 (1GB RAM)
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBenchDom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: Bug 339 - peth0: received packet with own address as
        source address
       
x86_32 (PAE)

        * SLES 9 SP2, FC3, FC4, and RHEL 4 IBM xSeries 305, 335s and IBM
        ThinkCentre
        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on all boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and guest domains
 
        ISSUES:  
        * Bugzilla Bug 244 - Unable to save domain
        * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
        * Bug 339 - peth0: received packet with own address as source
        address 

                
x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM HS20 Blades)

        * Builds and boots without problems
        * Able to create fully functional guest domains
        * Ran xm-test on both boxes
        * Successfully ran LTP and LMBench on Dom0s and DomUs

        ISSUES: 
        * Bugzilla Bug 258 x86_64 - general protection fault: 0000
        [1]
        * Bugzilla Bug 267 - (XEN) Domain 2 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#3:
        * Bugzilla Bug 339 - peth0: received packet with own address...
	* Bugzilla Bug 358 - x86_64 - (XEN) Domain 131 (vcpu#1) crashed on cpu#0: 
	  (Ian Pratt suggested this might be a different problem from Bug #267 and to
treat as a different issue)
		
        
--

--XM-TEST Results--

SUMMARY:
            Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
--+--+--+--+--+
              FC3pae |   78 |   12 |     0 |     6 |
 hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |   65 |   25 |     0 |     6 |
 hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 |   69 |   19 |     0 |     6 |
     hs20.fc4_x86_64 |   68 |   22 |     0 |     6 |
     x235sles9nonpae |   80 |    8 |     0 |     6 |
          x305rh4pae |   78 |    9 |     0 |     6 |
     x305sles9nonpae |   79 |    8 |     0 |     6 |
          x335fc4pae |   65 |   25 |     0 |     6 |
    x335sles9_pae4gb |   73 |   17 |     0 |     6 |

Regards

David F Barrera










_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Xen devel - Aug 2005 - Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Error: Error creating domain: (2, ''No such file or directory'')

Re: [Xen-devel] Error: Error creating domain: (2, ''No such file or directory'')

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

RE: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds