Jerone Young
2005-May-26 20:24 UTC
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix x86-64 SLES9 tools build problem...bugzilla #34
SLES9 has a problem with it''s <asm/elf.h> and other headers
associated
with it. Since we are only using one thing from this (that we really
don''t need) we can just stop including it. Someone speak up if they do
not think this is a suitable fix.
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34
Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <jyoung5@us.ibm.com>
--- xc_ptrace_core.c.old 2005-05-26 09:46:39.262113168 -0500
+++ xc_ptrace_core.c 2005-05-26 10:19:45.731123976 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include "xc_private.h"
-#include <asm/elf.h>
#include <time.h>
@@ -258,7 +257,7 @@ xc_ptrace_core(enum __ptrace_request req
case PTRACE_GETFPXREGS:
if (request == PTRACE_GETREGS) {
SET_PT_REGS(pt, ctxt[cpu].user_regs);
- memcpy(data, &pt, sizeof(elf_gregset_t));
+ memcpy(data, &pt, sizeof(struct gdb_regs));
} else if (request == PTRACE_GETFPREGS)
memcpy(data, &ctxt[cpu].fpu_ctxt, sizeof(ctxt[cpu].fpu_ctxt));
else /*if (request == PTRACE_GETFPXREGS)*/
--- xc_ptrace.c.old 2005-05-26 10:15:18.597734424 -0500
+++ xc_ptrace.c 2005-05-26 10:19:27.347918648 -0500
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include "xc_private.h"
-#include <asm/elf.h>
#include <time.h>
@@ -301,7 +300,7 @@ xc_ptrace(enum __ptrace_request request,
if (request == PTRACE_GETREGS) {
SET_PT_REGS(pt, ctxt[cpu].user_regs);
- memcpy(data, &pt, sizeof(elf_gregset_t));
+ memcpy(data, &pt, sizeof(struct gdb_regs));
} else if (request == PTRACE_GETFPREGS)
memcpy(data, &ctxt[cpu].fpu_ctxt, sizeof(ctxt[cpu].fpu_ctxt));
else /*if (request == PTRACE_GETFPXREGS)*/
--
Jerone Young
IBM Linux Technology Center
jyoung5@us.ibm.com
512-838-1157 (T/L: 678-1157)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Jerone Young
2005-May-31 15:10 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix x86-64 SLES9 tools build problem...bugzilla #34
Why is this patch not in the tree yet? No one seems to have any comments on it. Folks using SLES9 want it. On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 15:24 -0500, Jerone Young wrote:> SLES9 has a problem with it''s <asm/elf.h> and other headers associated > with it. Since we are only using one thing from this (that we really > don''t need) we can just stop including it. Someone speak up if they do > not think this is a suitable fix. > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34 > > Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <jyoung5@us.ibm.com> > > --- xc_ptrace_core.c.old 2005-05-26 09:46:39.262113168 -0500 > +++ xc_ptrace_core.c 2005-05-26 10:19:45.731123976 -0500 > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ > #include <sys/ptrace.h> > #include <sys/wait.h> > #include "xc_private.h" > -#include <asm/elf.h> > #include <time.h> > > @@ -258,7 +257,7 @@ xc_ptrace_core(enum __ptrace_request req > case PTRACE_GETFPXREGS: > if (request == PTRACE_GETREGS) { > SET_PT_REGS(pt, ctxt[cpu].user_regs); > - memcpy(data, &pt, sizeof(elf_gregset_t)); > + memcpy(data, &pt, sizeof(struct gdb_regs)); > } else if (request == PTRACE_GETFPREGS) > memcpy(data, &ctxt[cpu].fpu_ctxt, sizeof(ctxt[cpu].fpu_ctxt)); > else /*if (request == PTRACE_GETFPXREGS)*/ > > --- xc_ptrace.c.old 2005-05-26 10:15:18.597734424 -0500 > +++ xc_ptrace.c 2005-05-26 10:19:27.347918648 -0500 > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ > #include <sys/ptrace.h> > #include <sys/wait.h> > #include "xc_private.h" > -#include <asm/elf.h> > #include <time.h> > > > @@ -301,7 +300,7 @@ xc_ptrace(enum __ptrace_request request, > > if (request == PTRACE_GETREGS) { > SET_PT_REGS(pt, ctxt[cpu].user_regs); > - memcpy(data, &pt, sizeof(elf_gregset_t)); > + memcpy(data, &pt, sizeof(struct gdb_regs)); > } else if (request == PTRACE_GETFPREGS) > memcpy(data, &ctxt[cpu].fpu_ctxt, sizeof(ctxt[cpu].fpu_ctxt)); > else /*if (request == PTRACE_GETFPXREGS)*/ > >-- Jerone Young IBM Linux Technology Center jyoung5@us.ibm.com 512-838-1157 (T/L: 678-1157) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Ryan Harper
2005-May-31 15:32 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix x86-64 SLES9 tools build problem...bugzilla #34
* Jerone Young <jyoung5@us.ibm.com> [2005-05-31 10:13]:> Why is this patch not in the tree yet? No one seems to have any comments > on it. Folks using SLES9 want it.It was just committed: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-changelog/2005-05/msg00580.html -- Ryan Harper Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center IBM Corp., Austin, Tx (512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253 ryanh@us.ibm.com _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel