Xapian discuss - Aug 2010 - NetBeans and Java Bindings

Hello,

I was wondering if anyone has succeeded in getting the Java bindings to work
with NetBeans, in order to make use of NetBeans's GUI developer. I've
had no
luck so far, does anyone know how to do that?


Many thanks.

Athan,

Nobody has succeeded in getting the Java bindings to work with
NetBeans, because most of us programming in C++ and Perl. Please help
the bindings  with NetBeans to work, and post the updates.

Thanks,
Kevin Duraj
http://find1friend.com



On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Athan Fratzeskos <athan.fr at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has succeeded in getting the Java bindings to
work
> with NetBeans, in order to make use of NetBeans's GUI developer.
I've had no
> luck so far, does anyone know how to do that?
>
>
> Many thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> Xapian-discuss mailing list
> Xapian-discuss at lists.xapian.org
> http://lists.xapian.org/mailman/listinfo/xapian-discuss
>

eh, reply-to mix up at my end. My reply is below.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David P. Novakovic <davidnovakovic at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Xapian-discuss] NetBeans and Java Bindings
To: Kevin Duraj <kevin.softdev at gmail.com>


Heh..

It's rarely anything to do with the language, and more the person who
is writing it. If you have actually used Perl or Ruby and found them
to be 2-5 times slower then maybe you should spend as much time with
them as you have with Perl. I bet your Perl code has magically gotten
faster over the time you have been writing it. ;)

Anyway, I think gripes about tools you've never used are a bit off
topic on a search engine mailing list.


On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Kevin Duraj <kevin.softdev at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Olly,
>
> Do you think that the shift towards Python and Ruby from Perl is the
> cause of world wide economic crisis and global warnings? We all know
> that Python and Ruby needs least 2-5 times more CPU and electricity to
> consume in order to compute the same amount of data as Perl.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kevin Duraj
> http://myhealthcare.com/
> http://find1friend.com/
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com>
wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:23:56PM -0700, Kevin Duraj wrote:
>>> Nobody has succeeded in getting the Java bindings to work with
>>> NetBeans, because most of us programming in C++ and Perl.
>>
>> While it's hard to get reliable figures, I think you'd struggle
to justify
>> that claim. ?For instance, all the indications I've seen point to
Xapian being
>> used more with Python than Perl by a substantial margin. ?It seems
likely
>> Ruby is ahead of Perl in this regard too.
>>
>>> Please help the bindings with NetBeans to work, and post the
updates.
>>
>> Yes, patches are certainly welcome.
>>
>> I don't know anything about NetBeans, but you might have more
success with
>> the "java-swig" bindings. ?The hope is that these will
eventually replace
>> the hand-coded JNI bindings, though development has largely stalled:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.xapian.general/8354
>>
>> Cheers,
>> ? ?Olly
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xapian-discuss mailing list
> Xapian-discuss at lists.xapian.org
> http://lists.xapian.org/mailman/listinfo/xapian-discuss
>