Kevin Duraj
2007-Feb-12 20:03 UTC
[Xapian-discuss] Benchmark (index, search) on 20 million docs Xapian/Linux vs. Lucene/Windows
Benchmark performed on 2 Dual Core AMD Opteron Processor with 16 GB of memory *************************************************************** Documents used: - number of documents = 19999995 - average document length = 8.18631 *************************************************************** Indexing 20 million docs - Xapian 0 hours 47 minutes - Lucene 3 hours 30 minutes *************************************************************** Result: Xapian/Linux showed to be 77% faster then Lucene/Windows on indexing. *************************************************************** Searching 20 million docs: - Xapian average 56 ms - Lucene average 87 ms Same 50,000 unique boolean queries were applied to both Xapian and Lucene, between 100-1000 terms per search. *************************************************************** Result: Xapian/Linux showed to be 35% faster then Lucene/Windows on searching. *************************************************************** Disclaimer: This benchmark results will not be exactly same for your type of documents and definitely your should make your own research before making any decision based on this benchmark. Thanks, - Kevin Duraj
Michael
2007-Feb-13 03:05 UTC
[Xapian-discuss] what about CLucene/Linux Re: Benchmark (index, search) on 20 million docs Xapian/Linux vs. Lucene/Windows
Kevin Duraj <kevin.softdev <at> gmail.com> writes:> ... > Result: Xapian/Linux showed to be 35% faster > then Lucene/Windows on searching. > .... > Thanks, > - Kevin Duraj >Do you have results for CLucene/Linux as well? Coz I'm curious, both are written in C++. Thanks!
Reini Urban
2007-Feb-13 07:51 UTC
[Xapian-discuss] Benchmark (index, search) on 20 million docs Xapian/Linux vs. Lucene/Windows
Kevin Duraj schrieb: ...> Result: Xapian/Linux showed to be 35% faster > then Lucene/Windows on searching.That's the typical Windows overhead for finding and opening files on windows compared to linux. ReiserFS or anything faster than ext3 would do a bit better. -- Reini Urban http://phpwiki.org/ http://murbreak.at/ http://helsinki.at/ http://spacemovie.mur.at/