oscaruser@programmer.net
2006-Jun-20 21:55 UTC
[Xapian-discuss] xapian-compact seg faulting & Re: [Xapian-discuss] Error msg xapian-compact: The revision being read has been discarded - you should call Xapian::Database::reopen() and retry the operation
xapian-compact with flint db's is still breaking. i tried to more safely manage the scriptindex process as it built the flint dbs, but seems that something went awry nonetheless. thanks gamma:/index/omega/data# /home/oscar/xapian/bin/xapian-compact -F -m /svr/hda1/omega/data/bsp0*/default /index/omega/data/bsp0*/default /svr/hda1/xapian/default postlist: Reduced by 60.6323% 1074104K (1771504K -> 697400K) record: Reduced by 51.7614% 98032K (189392K -> 91360K) termlist .../home/oscar/xapian/bin/xapian-compact: The revision being read has been discarded - you should call Xapian::Database::reopen() and retry the operation gamma:/index/omega/data#> ----- Original Message ----- > From: oscaruser@programmer.net > To: xapian-discuss@lists.xapian.org > Subject: Re: [Xapian-discuss] xapian-compact seg faulting & Re: [Xapian-discuss] Error msg xapian-compact: The revision being read has been discarded - you should call Xapian::Database::reopen() and retry the operation > Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 09:22:42 -0800 > > > OK I'll rerun and report back. > > Thanks > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Olly Betts" <olly@survex.com> > > To: oscaruser@programmer.net > > Subject: Re: [Xapian-discuss] xapian-compact seg faulting & Re: > > [Xapian-discuss] Error msg xapian-compact: The revision being > > read has been discarded - you should call > > Xapian::Database::reopen() and retry the operation > > Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 01:13:08 +0100 > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:38:53AM -0800, oscaruser@programmer.net wrote: > > > I am fairly confident that these issues are related to killing the > > > scriptindex process ungracefully causing blocks that were queued for > > > writing to disk to not get written. > > > > The update order is carefully designed such that if the blocks aren't > > written, the new version doesn't go live and we stick with the old one. > > > > So I'm doubtful of this explanation. If you think I'm wrong, see if > > you can repeat the problem by interrupting an update... > > > > You didn't answer my question about whether this is a one-off incident > > or whether it happens if you run the system again from scratch. > > > > Cheers, > > Olly-- ___________________________________________________ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com/