Which one is more feature rich and easy to use, wxRuby or fxRuby? Can I develop a full-fledged client-server Windows based app. with wxRuby? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
hendra kusuma
2011-May-13 03:10 UTC
[wxruby-users] Which is more rich and easy, wxRuby or fxRuby?
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Rubist Rohit <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:> Which one is more feature rich and easy to use, wxRuby or fxRuby? Can I > develop a full-fledged client-server Windows based app. with wxRuby? > >Never use fxRuby But yes, you can develop a full-fledged client server window based app with wxRuby -- Suka linux? Kunjungi blog saya http://penguinroad.blogspot.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-users/attachments/20110513/9ac4d8f9/attachment.html>
Alex Fenton
2011-May-13 14:10 UTC
[wxruby-users] Which is more rich and easy, wxRuby or fxRuby?
On 12/05/11 20:39, Rubist Rohit wrote:> Which one is more feature rich and easy to use, wxRuby or fxRuby?Easiness: just about the same. Featureness: Wx is a more capable toolkit than Fox. It also looks better, in most people''s opinions.> Can I > develop a full-fledged client-server Windows based app. with wxRuby?Yes - there is a sample included in the distribution which gives an example of client/server programming over TCP/IP. a