Hi,
Has this problem been resolved?
I encountered the same problem on my FC3 system with wxGTK-2.4.2 and
wxruby-0.6.
Thanks.
Stephen
[Wxruby-users] Re: Problem building wxRuby: htmlproc.h not found
*Nick* devel at nicreations.com
<mailto:wxruby-users%40rubyforge.org?Subject=%5BWxruby-users%5D%20Re%3A%20Problem%20building%20wxRuby%3A%20htmlproc.h%20not%20found&In-Reply-To=41BD095B.7000803%40mktec.com>
/Sun Dec 12 22:44:12 EST 2004/
* Previous message: [Wxruby-users] Re: Problem building wxRuby:
htmlproc.h not found
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-users/2004-December/001053.html>
* Next message: [Wxruby-users] Re: Problem building wxRuby:
htmlproc.h not found
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-users/2004-December/001052.html>
* *Messages sorted by:* [ date ]
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-users/2004-December/date.html#1054>
[ thread ]
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-users/2004-December/thread.html#1054>
[ subject ]
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-users/2004-December/subject.html#1054>
[ author ]
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-users/2004-December/author.html#1054>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zach,
The default wxGTK 2.4.2 doesn''t include one of the HTML files (by
accident). It''s the whole reason we need to remove the functionality
for
linux.
Nick
Zach Dennis wrote:
>/ Nick wrote:
/>/
/>>/
/>>/ I''ve heard of this before. Try running this line and send me
the output
/>>/
/>>/ ruby -e "p RUBY_PLATFORM"
/>>/
/>>/ Nick
/>>/
/>>/
/>>/ Andreas Schwarz wrote:
/>>/
/>>>/ I''m trying to build wxRuby 6.0 on Linux (Ubuntu). When I
run make I
/>>>/ get an error because htmlproc.h is not found (it does not exist
in
/>>>/ the Linux version of wxWidgets). I see that the html* object
files
/>>>/ are removed from $objs in the extconf.rb if /linux/ =~
RUBY_PLATFORM,
/>>>/ but still the Makefile tries to build them.
/>>>/
/>>>/ $ ruby -v
/>>>/ ruby 1.8.2 (2004-08-24) [i386-linux]
/>>>/ $ wx-config --version
/>>>/ 2.4.2
/>/
/>/
/>/ I''ve had this problem on my Windows box, but I do not have this
problem
/>/ on my linux box. I have the same setup and I do not get the same
problem
/>/ with wxRuby 0.6.0 on my Debian box. I am also using wxWindows 2.4.2.
/>/
/>/ 1 - My html*.h files are in my /usr/include/wx/html directory. Are they
/>/ in yours? If not, if you do a find, where are they located, and is that
/>/ path in your extconf.rb file? (Looking for path discrepanices here)
/>/
/>/ 2- Do you get anything to compile or does it fail on the html*.h files
/>/ right off the start?
/>/
/>/ 3- Do you have wxWindows src? and not just devel tools. I know w/Debian
/>/ there are a few different wxWindows packages available...
/>/
/>/ Zach
/>/ _______________________________________________
/>/ wxruby-users mailing list
/>/ wxruby-users at rubyforge.org
<http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users>
/>/ http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users
/>/
/>/
/>/
/
Kevin Smith
2006-Feb-18 16:59 UTC
[Wxruby-users] Problem building wxRuby: htmlproc.h not found
I''m not sure, but probably not. All development work for many months has been focused on wxruby2 (aka wxruby-swig). The 0.6 codebase is more or less orphaned at this point. In most ways, wxruby2 is already better than wxruby 0.6, even though we haven''t "released" it yet. Honestly, I forget exactly how the 0.6 makefile system even worked, but you should be able to manually edit it to remove the references to the html files to work around the problem. Kevin On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 10:18 +0800, Stephen Ng wrote:> Hi, > Has this problem been resolved? > > I encountered the same problem on my FC3 system with wxGTK-2.4.2 and > wxruby-0.6. > > Thanks. > > Stephen > > [Wxruby-users] Re: Problem building wxRuby: htmlproc.h not found > *Nick* devel at nicreations.com > <mailto:wxruby-users%40rubyforge.org?Subject=%5BWxruby-users%5D%20Re%3A%20Problem%20building%20wxRuby%3A%20htmlproc.h%20not%20found&In-Reply-To=41BD095B.7000803%40mktec.com> > /Sun Dec 12 22:44:12 EST 2004/ > > * Previous message: [Wxruby-users] Re: Problem building wxRuby: > htmlproc.h not found > <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-users/2004-December/001053.html> > * Next message: [Wxruby-users] Re: Problem building wxRuby: > htmlproc.h not found > <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-users/2004-December/001052.html> > * *Messages sorted by:* [ date ] > <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-users/2004-December/date.html#1054> > [ thread ] > <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-users/2004-December/thread.html#1054> > [ subject ] > <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-users/2004-December/subject.html#1054> > [ author ] > <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/wxruby-users/2004-December/author.html#1054> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Zach, > > The default wxGTK 2.4.2 doesn''t include one of the HTML files (by > accident). It''s the whole reason we need to remove the functionality for > linux. > > Nick > > Zach Dennis wrote: > >/ Nick wrote: > />/ > />>/ > />>/ I''ve heard of this before. Try running this line and send me the output > />>/ > />>/ ruby -e "p RUBY_PLATFORM" > />>/ > />>/ Nick > />>/ > />>/ > />>/ Andreas Schwarz wrote: > />>/ > />>>/ I''m trying to build wxRuby 6.0 on Linux (Ubuntu). When I run make I > />>>/ get an error because htmlproc.h is not found (it does not exist in > />>>/ the Linux version of wxWidgets). I see that the html* object files > />>>/ are removed from $objs in the extconf.rb if /linux/ =~ RUBY_PLATFORM, > />>>/ but still the Makefile tries to build them. > />>>/ > />>>/ $ ruby -v > />>>/ ruby 1.8.2 (2004-08-24) [i386-linux] > />>>/ $ wx-config --version > />>>/ 2.4.2 > />/ > />/ > />/ I''ve had this problem on my Windows box, but I do not have this problem > />/ on my linux box. I have the same setup and I do not get the same > problem > />/ with wxRuby 0.6.0 on my Debian box. I am also using wxWindows 2.4.2. > />/ > />/ 1 - My html*.h files are in my /usr/include/wx/html directory. Are they > />/ in yours? If not, if you do a find, where are they located, and is that > />/ path in your extconf.rb file? (Looking for path discrepanices here) > />/ > />/ 2- Do you get anything to compile or does it fail on the html*.h files > />/ right off the start? > />/ > />/ 3- Do you have wxWindows src? and not just devel tools. I know w/Debian > />/ there are a few different wxWindows packages available... > />/ > />/ Zach > />/ _______________________________________________ > />/ wxruby-users mailing list > />/ wxruby-users at rubyforge.org > <http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users> > />/ http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users > />/ > />/ > />/ > / > _______________________________________________ > wxruby-users mailing list > wxruby-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users
Shashank Date
2006-Feb-18 18:57 UTC
[Wxruby-users] Problem building wxRuby: htmlproc.h not found
Hi Kevin, Kevin Smith wrote:>All development work for many months has >been focused on wxruby2 (aka wxruby-swig). The 0.6 codebase is more or >less orphaned at this point. In most ways, wxruby2 is already better >than wxruby 0.6, even though we haven''t "released" it yet. > >It is good to know that wxruby2 is already better than wxRuby 0.6. When can we expect a release, even if it is pre-beta? I have a project on hold, just for want of wxRuby2, hence the anxiety. I also intend to help in writing good user documentation. PragProg''s Friday eBook comes to mind: http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/starter_kit/faqs/fridays.html Thanks, -- Shashank
Kevin Smith
2006-Feb-19 00:43 UTC
[Wxruby-users] Problem building wxRuby: htmlproc.h not found
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 12:57 -0600, Shashank Date wrote:> It is good to know that wxruby2 is already better than wxRuby 0.6. > When can we expect a release, even if it is pre-beta?Good question. We (the most active wxruby contributors) have been reluctant to release wxruby2 because it has some known, significant problems. But then so does wxruby 0.6. Also, wxruby2 does not yet support *all* of the classes and methods that wxruby 0.6 supports. So in that sense it is a small step backwards. So here''s a new proposal: I now think we should release the current wxruby2 as a "2.0-preview" release. That way, people will be encouraged to download it (instead of having to pull from cvs), and are more likely to test it, and even contribute patches. I''ll try to do that release within the next couple weeks, unless someone points out a reason it would be a bad idea to do so. I''m also open to better names than "preview", such as "alpha" or "raw" or whatever. Thanks for your interest. Kevin
Roy Sutton
2006-Feb-19 01:06 UTC
[Wxruby-users] Problem building wxRuby: htmlproc.h not found
Glad to see interest picking up again. The one thing that I think we were all waiting on was the memory tracking stuff. I think we might want to re-evaluate with the latest SWIG release and see if we have the solution to our problems and then get the preview ready. I myself have been busy with my new bouncing baby boy but am starting to be able to come up for air. I''d like to get going again. Roy Kevin Smith wrote:> On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 12:57 -0600, Shashank Date wrote: > >> It is good to know that wxruby2 is already better than wxRuby 0.6. >> When can we expect a release, even if it is pre-beta? >> > > Good question. We (the most active wxruby contributors) have been > reluctant to release wxruby2 because it has some known, significant > problems. But then so does wxruby 0.6. Also, wxruby2 does not yet > support *all* of the classes and methods that wxruby 0.6 supports. So in > that sense it is a small step backwards. > > So here''s a new proposal: I now think we should release the current > wxruby2 as a "2.0-preview" release. That way, people will be encouraged > to download it (instead of having to pull from cvs), and are more likely > to test it, and even contribute patches. > > I''ll try to do that release within the next couple weeks, unless someone > points out a reason it would be a bad idea to do so. I''m also open to > better names than "preview", such as "alpha" or "raw" or whatever. > > Thanks for your interest. > > Kevin > > > _______________________________________________ > wxruby-users mailing list > wxruby-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users > > > >
Alex Fenton
2006-Feb-19 03:08 UTC
[Wxruby-users] Problem building wxRuby: htmlproc.h not found
Roy Sutton wrote:> Glad to see interest picking up again.Ditto, I''m still around and keen to contribute test cases, docs, SWIG files etc. I''ve just released Weft QDA version 1.0 (based on wxruby 0.6.0) and I want to use wxruby2 for version 2.0 - firstly for unicode support, but also lots of tempting widgets. I''ve got some classes that are half-working but keep running into a common set of SWIG problems I can''t solve. Also I have been working on some modular extensions to Wx syntax to make the API more ruby-ish. They''re not quite ready to go yet, and I''m abroad without computer for the next month (Borneo!), but hopefully will be able to put out a release after that. Here''s a little sample: @frame = Wx::Frame.new( nil, :title => "Arranger Application" ) listen(:close, @frame) # binds automatically to self#on_close @frame.arrange_grid( :cols => 2, :vgap => 3 ) # easy sizers @frame.padding = 1 @frame.add( Wx::Panel[ :size => [100, 100] ], :grow => 1 ) do | panel | panel.add( Wx::TextCtrl[ :value => ''initial value'', :multiline => true ] ) panel.add( Wx::Button[:label => ''foo''] ) do | button | listen(:button, button) { | e | p "foo" } # block handler listen(:button, button, :on_foo_button) # specify a handler method end end> The one thing that I think we > were all waiting on was the memory tracking stuff. I think we might > want to re-evaluate with the latest SWIG release and see if we have the > solution to our problems and then get the preview ready.The info at http://www.swig.org/Doc1.3/Ruby.html#Ruby_nn57 looks interesting but I''m not sure if this would help.> I myself have > been busy with my new bouncing baby boy but am starting to be able to > come up for air. I''d like to get going again. >Congratulations. cheers alex
Kevin Smith
2006-Feb-19 03:42 UTC
[Wxruby-users] wxruby2 plans (was: Problem building wxRuby: htmlproc.h not found)
On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 03:08 +0000, Alex Fenton wrote:> Roy Sutton wrote: > > Glad to see interest picking up again.Me too. I''m really going to try to at least put a few hours a week in on wxruby.> @frame = Wx::Frame.new( nil, :title => "Arranger Application" )I''m biased against => parameters, but am open to seeing how it all comes together.> The info at http://www.swig.org/Doc1.3/Ruby.html#Ruby_nn57 looks > interesting but I''m not sure if this would help. >Thanks for pointing that out! It looks like some of what we have been doing ourselves is now built into swig, which should help a lot. Further, there''s a lot of discussion and plenty of examples on that page, so with that we may be able to solve everything. Kevin
Sean Long
2006-Feb-19 08:31 UTC
[Wxruby-users] Problem building wxRuby: htmlproc.h not found
I too have been busy but still keep an eye on this mailing list. I now have a iMac with the Intel chip in it and am glade to report that wxRuby2 compiled with only one small change. I had to change /powerpc-darwin/ to /darwin/ in rakeutil.rb. I am all for a preview release Sean On 2/18/06, Alex Fenton <alex at pressure.to> wrote:> Roy Sutton wrote: > > Glad to see interest picking up again. > Ditto, I''m still around and keen to contribute test cases, docs, SWIG > files etc. I''ve just released Weft QDA version 1.0 (based on wxruby > 0.6.0) and I want to use wxruby2 for version 2.0 - firstly for unicode > support, but also lots of tempting widgets. I''ve got some classes that > are half-working but keep running into a common set of SWIG problems I > can''t solve. > > Also I have been working on some modular extensions to Wx syntax to make > the API more ruby-ish. They''re not quite ready to go yet, and I''m abroad > without computer for the next month (Borneo!), but hopefully will be > able to put out a release after that. Here''s a little sample: > > @frame = Wx::Frame.new( nil, :title => "Arranger Application" ) > listen(:close, @frame) # binds automatically to self#on_close > @frame.arrange_grid( :cols => 2, :vgap => 3 ) # easy sizers > @frame.padding = 1 > @frame.add( Wx::Panel[ :size => [100, 100] ], :grow => 1 ) do | panel | > panel.add( Wx::TextCtrl[ :value => ''initial value'', > :multiline => true ] ) > panel.add( Wx::Button[:label => ''foo''] ) do | button | > listen(:button, button) { | e | p "foo" } # block handler > listen(:button, button, :on_foo_button) # specify a handler method > end > end > > The one thing that I think we > > were all waiting on was the memory tracking stuff. I think we might > > want to re-evaluate with the latest SWIG release and see if we have the > > solution to our problems and then get the preview ready. > The info at http://www.swig.org/Doc1.3/Ruby.html#Ruby_nn57 looks > interesting but I''m not sure if this would help. > > > I myself have > > been busy with my new bouncing baby boy but am starting to be able to > > come up for air. I''d like to get going again. > > > Congratulations. > > cheers > alex > _______________________________________________ > wxruby-users mailing list > wxruby-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users >