Updated all the sample files to add the shebang line and the require code we discussed. I also added the wxRuby copyright notice to all the samples I know I added (I may have missed some). Next, how about we rename all the .rbw files to .rb and update bigdemo? Roy
Roy Sutton wrote:> Updated all the sample files to add the shebang line and the require > code we discussed. >Cool, thank you. Just got these via SVN update.> Next, how about we rename all the .rbw files to .rb and update bigdemo? >What would be the rationale for doing this? I''m not against this, just curious. If we do go ahead, we should use ''svn move'' on URLs rather than deleting and adding the files - this will preserve the revision history. alex
Alex Fenton wrote:> Roy Sutton wrote: > >> Next, how about we rename all the .rbw files to .rb and update bigdemo? >> >> > What would be the rationale for doing this? I''m not against this, just > curious. >Well, .rbw detaches from the console on Windows, which can make debugging difficult, for one thing. For another, .rbw seems to be a Windows-specific extension.> If we do go ahead, we should use ''svn move'' on URLs rather than deleting > and adding the files - this will preserve the revision history. >Of course, that was my plan. Roy
Roy Sutton wrote:> Well, .rbw detaches from the console on Windows, which can make > debugging difficult, for one thing. For another, .rbw seems to be a > Windows-specific extension. >Sound like sound reasons to me. +1>> If we do go ahead, we should use ''svn move'' on URLs rather than deleting >> and adding the files - this will preserve the revision history. >> >> > Of course, that was my plan. >Cool, I''m still finding my way around SVN does better than CVS. Never used it before wxruby, but i''m glad we made the switch. a