Is the following a wine error or a dll error? wine /mnt/win98/Program\ Files/Microsoft\ Office/Office/winword.exe fixme:x11drv:X11DRV_GetDeviceCaps (0x1e4): CAPS1 is unimplemented, will return 0fixme:icon:DrawIconEx no flags set? setting to DI_NORMAL err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x7befc084 "loader.c: loader_section" wait timed out in thread 0017, blocked by 0015, retrying (60 sec) err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x7befc084 "loader.c: loader_section" wait timed out in thread 0016, blocked by 0015, retrying (60 sec) err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x7b7bdd80 "user_main.c: USER_SysLevel" wait timed out in thread 0012, blocked by 0016, retrying (60 sec) err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0x7b7bdd80 "user_main.c: USER_SysLevel" wait timed out in thread 0015, blocked by 0016, retrying (60 sec)
Hiho Mailing-list members, i just noticed that wine 0.9 BETA has found its way in debian SID. Or at least i have it in synaptic.. no matter if its from sid repo or the winehq.org one. Well, some versions ago i expierienced a problem in SecuRom-support if wine is compiled with GCC4. De facto the SecuRom-support did not work when wine was compiled with GCC4. using GCC 3.x it worked perfectly. (Tested with WARCRAFT III) Well, my question is now if anyone took care of this problem and i can expect it to be fixed in the beta, or if this is still an open issue. I know it is quite an event for the devs to have a beta. It took... how long now? 15 years? Well... getting wine to final will be a great task, but i think at least if some parts are that sensitive on something like a GCC version, it will lead to much trouble, considering the masses of distributions using different sets and versions of nearly everything. So just to avoid such a problem getting lost in the overall rush, i wanted to point it out here once more. (perhaps there are other parts of wine suffering the same but no one notices right now) have a nice weekend people. Greetings, Chris