Hello, I'm new to this list and I tried to avoid this mail for more than a week. I've been reading through all of the docs about my problem and I think that I discovered it but I need a tip to solve it. Here my problem: Output of the configure skript *snipp* checking for GL/gl.h... (cached) yes checking for GL/glx.h... (cached) yes checking for GL/glext.h... (cached) yes checking for up-to-date OpenGL version... (cached) yes checking for thread-safe OpenGL version... (cached) no checking for glXCreateContext in -lGL... (cached) no checking for gluLookAt in -lGLU... (cached) no *snipp* What is wrong? libGL.so and libGLU are in position. libGL.so points to the NVidia-libs. The headerfiles are the correct ones. ldconfig -p says that it got the libraries. So why da heck don't I get hardware acceleration. By the way: Alle other 3d apps compile perfectly. (Sorry, I'm really desperate. I'm not used to deal with such kind of compileprobelms. My last c++ program was done some time ago and everything beyond a javac is getting me into trouble at the momen ;-) ) Thx Jochen
On Thu, 2001-09-20 at 18:20, 666jochen666 wrote:> Hello, I'm new to this list and I tried to avoid this mail for more than a > week. I've been reading through all of the docs about my problem and I think > that I discovered it but I need a tip to solve it. > Here my problem: > > Output of the configure skript > > *snipp* > checking for GL/gl.h... (cached) yes > checking for GL/glx.h... (cached) yes > checking for GL/glext.h... (cached) yes > checking for up-to-date OpenGL version... (cached) yes > checking for thread-safe OpenGL version... (cached) no > checking for glXCreateContext in -lGL... (cached) no > checking for gluLookAt in -lGLU... (cached) no > *snipp* > > What is wrong? libGL.so and libGLU are in position. libGL.so points to the > NVidia-libs. The headerfiles are the correct ones. ldconfig -p says that it > got the libraries.Perhaps you have already checked, but are you sure there are not any extra libGL.so files around? The ones in /usr/lib may be the correct Nvidia versions, but try doing a "locate libGL" and see if some show up somewhere else as well... I had the same problem a few weeks ago, I am pretty sure I was getting the exact same configure output. I had though I had already looked for leftover Mesa libs, but after much head scratching I finally found an extraneous (Mesa) library under /usr/X11R6/lib, to which the test scripts were linking instead of the Nvidia version under /usr/lib. Deleting the /usr/X11R6/lib version cleaned the problem right up. This was with Debian/testing, YMMV.
> I had the same problem a few weeks ago, I am pretty sure I was getting > the exact same configure output. I had though I had already looked for > leftover Mesa libs, but after much head scratching I finally found an > extraneous (Mesa) library under /usr/X11R6/lib, to which the test > scripts were linking instead of the Nvidia version under /usr/lib. > Deleting the /usr/X11R6/lib version cleaned the problem right up. This > was with Debian/testing, YMMV.Already checked that with ldconfig and locate. Both tell me that there are only those libs that I installed.