Hi all, So far I have put all of the Win32Utils code (and all of my OSS Ruby stuff, really) under "Ruby''s" license. Ruby''s license is a modified version of the LGPL. I was thinking of switching to Artistic 2.0, which is still "GPL compatible": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artistic_License http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license-2.0.php http://www.theperlreview.com/Interviews/allison-randal-artistic-license.html I like it because it''s short and relatively easy to read. And it held up in US court: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2008081313212422 What do you think? Does anyone object to switching to Artistic 2.0? Regards, Dan