Daniel Berger
2009-Feb-23 01:16 UTC
[Win32utils-devel] Fwd: win32utils-devel post from noreply@rubyforge.org requires approval
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <win32utils-devel-owner at rubyforge.org> Date: Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:12 AM Subject: win32utils-devel post from noreply at rubyforge.org requires approval To: win32utils-devel-owner at rubyforge.org As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the following mailing list posting: List: win32utils-devel at rubyforge.org From: noreply at rubyforge.org Subject: [ win32utils-Bugs-24057 ] $? not always set in version 0.2.7 Reason: Message has implicit destination At your convenience, visit: http://rubyforge.org/mailman/admindb/win32utils-devel to approve or deny the request. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <noreply at rubyforge.org> To: noreply at rubyforge.org Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:12:27 -0500 (EST) Subject: [ win32utils-Bugs-24057 ] $? not always set in version 0.2.7 Bugs item #24057, was opened at 2009-02-22 13:12 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=24057&group_id=85 Category: win32-open3 Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Nobody (None) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: $? not always set in version 0.2.7 Initial Comment: For some commands $? is not set in version 0.2.7. Seems to work in 0.2.6. Here is a script to reproduce: require ''win32/open3'' include Open4 puts Open3::WIN32_OPEN3_VERSION status = popen4("echo hello") do |stdin,stdout,stderr,pid| stdout.each { |line| puts "stdout:"+line } stderr.each { |line| puts "stderr:"+line } end puts $?.inspect Ver 0.2.6 output: 0.2.6 stdout:hello #<Process::Status: pid=1848,exited(0)> Ver 0.2.7 output: 0.2.7 stdout:hello nil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=24057&group_id=85 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: win32utils-devel-request at rubyforge.org To: Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:12:29 -0500 Subject: confirm ef942643392134473777b36da844520daaf5115e If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact, Mailman will discard the held message. Do this if the message is spam. If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting to the list. The Approved: header can also appear in the first line of the body of the reply.