win32utils devel - Sep 2006 - [ win32utils-Feature Requests-5855 ] gems for every package

Feature Requests item #5855, was opened at 2006-09-22 15:42
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414&aid=5855&group_id=85

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Ivan Muzzolini (imuzzolini)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gems for every package

Initial Comment:
Why not having a gem for every package?


Thanks!

Bye!
Ivan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414&aid=5855&group_id=85

Feature Requests item #5855, was opened at 2006-09-22 08:42
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414&aid=5855&group_id=85

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Ivan Muzzolini (imuzzolini)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gems for every package

Initial Comment:
Why not having a gem for every package?


Thanks!

Bye!
Ivan

----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Daniel Berger (djberg96)
Date: 2006-09-23 15:35

Message:
We''re working on it!

The C extensions are proving to be a pain.  I''m not sure if
it''s a bug in gems or what, because building and installing gems
locally works fine, but when I pull them remotely they fail.  That''s
why you''ve only seen gems for the pure Ruby stuff so far.

Thanks,

Dan

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414&aid=5855&group_id=85