Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-Jul-25 11:50 UTC
[PATCH net-next v3 4/4] vsock/virtio: MSG_ZEROCOPY flag support
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 08:09:03AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:> > > On 21.07.2023 00:42, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: > > This adds handling of MSG_ZEROCOPY flag on transmission path: if this > > flag is set and zerocopy transmission is possible (enabled in socket > > options and transport allows zerocopy), then non-linear skb will be > > created and filled with the pages of user's buffer. Pages of user's > > buffer are locked in memory by 'get_user_pages()'. Second thing that > > this patch does is replace type of skb owning: instead of calling > > 'skb_set_owner_sk_safe()' it calls 'skb_set_owner_w()'. Reason of this > > change is that '__zerocopy_sg_from_iter()' increments 'sk_wmem_alloc' > > of socket, so to decrease this field correctly proper skb destructor is > > needed: 'sock_wfree()'. This destructor is set by 'skb_set_owner_w()'. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov at sberdevices.ru> > > --- > > Changelog: > > v5(big patchset) -> v1: > > * Refactorings of 'if' conditions. > > * Remove extra blank line. > > * Remove 'frag_off' field unneeded init. > > * Add function 'virtio_transport_fill_skb()' which fills both linear > > and non-linear skb with provided data. > > v1 -> v2: > > * Use original order of last four arguments in 'virtio_transport_alloc_skb()'. > > v2 -> v3: > > * Add new transport callback: 'msgzerocopy_check_iov'. It checks that > > provided 'iov_iter' with data could be sent in a zerocopy mode. > > If this callback is not set in transport - transport allows to send > > any 'iov_iter' in zerocopy mode. Otherwise - if callback returns 'true' > > then zerocopy is allowed. Reason of this callback is that in case of > > G2H transmission we insert whole skb to the tx virtio queue and such > > skb must fit to the size of the virtio queue to be sent in a single > > iteration (may be tx logic in 'virtio_transport.c' could be reworked > > as in vhost to support partial send of current skb). This callback > > will be enabled only for G2H path. For details pls see comment > > 'Check that tx queue...' below. > > > > include/net/af_vsock.h | 3 + > > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 39 ++++ > > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 257 ++++++++++++++++++------ > > 3 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h > > index 0e7504a42925..a6b346eeeb8e 100644 > > --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h > > +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h > > @@ -177,6 +177,9 @@ struct vsock_transport { > > > > /* Read a single skb */ > > int (*read_skb)(struct vsock_sock *, skb_read_actor_t); > > + > > + /* Zero-copy. */ > > + bool (*msgzerocopy_check_iov)(const struct iov_iter *); > > }; > > > > /**** CORE ****/ > > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c > > index 7bbcc8093e51..23cb8ed638c4 100644 > > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c > > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c > > @@ -442,6 +442,43 @@ static void virtio_vsock_rx_done(struct virtqueue *vq) > > queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work); > > } > > > > +static bool virtio_transport_msgzerocopy_check_iov(const struct iov_iter *iov) > > +{ > > + struct virtio_vsock *vsock; > > + bool res = false; > > + > > + rcu_read_lock(); > > + > > + vsock = rcu_dereference(the_virtio_vsock); > > + if (vsock) { > > + struct virtqueue *vq; > > + int iov_pages; > > + > > + vq = vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX]; > > + > > + iov_pages = round_up(iov->count, PAGE_SIZE) / PAGE_SIZE; > > + > > + /* Check that tx queue is large enough to keep whole > > + * data to send. This is needed, because when there is > > + * not enough free space in the queue, current skb to > > + * send will be reinserted to the head of tx list of > > + * the socket to retry transmission later, so if skb > > + * is bigger than whole queue, it will be reinserted > > + * again and again, thus blocking other skbs to be sent. > > + * Each page of the user provided buffer will be added > > + * as a single buffer to the tx virtqueue, so compare > > + * number of pages against maximum capacity of the queue. > > + * +1 means buffer for the packet header. > > + */ > > + if (iov_pages + 1 <= vq->num_max) > > I think this check is actual only for case one we don't have indirect buffer feature. > With indirect mode whole data to send will be packed into one indirect buffer. > > Thanks, ArseniyActually the reverse. With indirect you are limited to num_max. Without you are limited to whatever space is left in the queue (which you did not check here, so you should).> > + res = true; > > + } > > + > > + rcu_read_unlock();Just curious: is the point of all this RCU dance to allow vsock to change from under us? then why is it ok to have it change? the virtio_transport_msgzerocopy_check_iov will then refer to the old vsock ...> > + > > + return res; > > +} > > + > > static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(u32 remote_cid); > > > > static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = { > > @@ -475,6 +512,8 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = { > > .seqpacket_allow = virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow, > > .seqpacket_has_data = virtio_transport_seqpacket_has_data, > > > > + .msgzerocopy_check_iov = virtio_transport_msgzerocopy_check_iov, > > + > > .notify_poll_in = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in, > > .notify_poll_out = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out, > > .notify_recv_init = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init, > > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c > > index 26a4d10da205..e4e3d541aff4 100644 > > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c > > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c > > @@ -37,73 +37,122 @@ virtio_transport_get_ops(struct vsock_sock *vsk) > > return container_of(t, struct virtio_transport, transport); > > } > > > > -/* Returns a new packet on success, otherwise returns NULL. > > - * > > - * If NULL is returned, errp is set to a negative errno. > > - */ > > -static struct sk_buff * > > -virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info, > > - size_t len, > > - u32 src_cid, > > - u32 src_port, > > - u32 dst_cid, > > - u32 dst_port) > > -{ > > - const size_t skb_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_HEADROOM + len; > > - struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr; > > - struct sk_buff *skb; > > - void *payload; > > - int err; > > +static bool virtio_transport_can_zcopy(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info, > > + size_t max_to_send) > > +{ > > + const struct vsock_transport *t; > > + struct iov_iter *iov_iter; > > > > - skb = virtio_vsock_alloc_skb(skb_len, GFP_KERNEL); > > - if (!skb) > > - return NULL; > > + if (!info->msg) > > + return false; > > > > - hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb); > > - hdr->type = cpu_to_le16(info->type); > > - hdr->op = cpu_to_le16(info->op); > > - hdr->src_cid = cpu_to_le64(src_cid); > > - hdr->dst_cid = cpu_to_le64(dst_cid); > > - hdr->src_port = cpu_to_le32(src_port); > > - hdr->dst_port = cpu_to_le32(dst_port); > > - hdr->flags = cpu_to_le32(info->flags); > > - hdr->len = cpu_to_le32(len); > > + iov_iter = &info->msg->msg_iter; > > > > - if (info->msg && len > 0) { > > - payload = skb_put(skb, len); > > - err = memcpy_from_msg(payload, info->msg, len); > > - if (err) > > - goto out; > > + t = vsock_core_get_transport(info->vsk); > > > > - if (msg_data_left(info->msg) == 0 && > > - info->type == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET) { > > - hdr->flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM); > > + if (t->msgzerocopy_check_iov && > > + !t->msgzerocopy_check_iov(iov_iter)) > > + return false; > > > > - if (info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_EOR) > > - hdr->flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR); > > - } > > + /* Data is simple buffer. */ > > + if (iter_is_ubuf(iov_iter)) > > + return true; > > + > > + if (!iter_is_iovec(iov_iter)) > > + return false; > > + > > + if (iov_iter->iov_offset) > > + return false; > > + > > + /* We can't send whole iov. */ > > + if (iov_iter->count > max_to_send) > > + return false; > > + > > + return true; > > +} > > + > > +static int virtio_transport_init_zcopy_skb(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > > + struct sk_buff *skb, > > + struct msghdr *msg, > > + bool zerocopy) > > +{ > > + struct ubuf_info *uarg; > > + > > + if (msg->msg_ubuf) { > > + uarg = msg->msg_ubuf; > > + net_zcopy_get(uarg); > > + } else { > > + struct iov_iter *iter = &msg->msg_iter; > > + struct ubuf_info_msgzc *uarg_zc; > > + int len; > > + > > + /* Only ITER_IOVEC or ITER_UBUF are allowed and > > + * checked before. > > + */ > > + if (iter_is_iovec(iter)) > > + len = iov_length(iter->__iov, iter->nr_segs); > > + else > > + len = iter->count; > > + > > + uarg = msg_zerocopy_realloc(sk_vsock(vsk), > > + len, > > + NULL); > > + if (!uarg) > > + return -1; > > + > > + uarg_zc = uarg_to_msgzc(uarg); > > + uarg_zc->zerocopy = zerocopy ? 1 : 0; > > } > > > > - if (info->reply) > > - virtio_vsock_skb_set_reply(skb); > > + skb_zcopy_init(skb, uarg); > > > > - trace_virtio_transport_alloc_pkt(src_cid, src_port, > > - dst_cid, dst_port, > > - len, > > - info->type, > > - info->op, > > - info->flags); > > + return 0; > > +} > > > > - if (info->vsk && !skb_set_owner_sk_safe(skb, sk_vsock(info->vsk))) { > > - WARN_ONCE(1, "failed to allocate skb on vsock socket with sk_refcnt == 0\n"); > > - goto out; > > +static int virtio_transport_fill_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, > > + struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info, > > + size_t len, > > + bool zcopy) > > +{ > > + if (zcopy) { > > + return __zerocopy_sg_from_iter(info->msg, NULL, skb, > > + &info->msg->msg_iter, > > + len); > > + } else { > > + void *payload; > > + int err; > > + > > + payload = skb_put(skb, len); > > + err = memcpy_from_msg(payload, info->msg, len); > > + if (err) > > + return -1; > > + > > + if (msg_data_left(info->msg)) > > + return 0; > > + > > + return 0; > > } > > +} > > > > - return skb; > > +static void virtio_transport_init_hdr(struct sk_buff *skb, > > + struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info, > > + u32 src_cid, > > + u32 src_port, > > + u32 dst_cid, > > + u32 dst_port, > > + size_t len) > > +{ > > + struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr; > > > > -out: > > - kfree_skb(skb); > > - return NULL; > > + hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb); > > + hdr->type = cpu_to_le16(info->type); > > + hdr->op = cpu_to_le16(info->op); > > + hdr->src_cid = cpu_to_le64(src_cid); > > + hdr->dst_cid = cpu_to_le64(dst_cid); > > + hdr->src_port = cpu_to_le32(src_port); > > + hdr->dst_port = cpu_to_le32(dst_port); > > + hdr->flags = cpu_to_le32(info->flags); > > + hdr->len = cpu_to_le32(len); > > } > > > > static void virtio_transport_copy_nonlinear_skb(const struct sk_buff *skb, > > @@ -214,6 +263,70 @@ static u16 virtio_transport_get_type(struct sock *sk) > > return VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET; > > } > > > > +static struct sk_buff *virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > > + struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info, > > + size_t payload_len, > > + bool zcopy, > > + u32 src_cid, > > + u32 src_port, > > + u32 dst_cid, > > + u32 dst_port) > > +{ > > + struct sk_buff *skb; > > + size_t skb_len; > > + > > + skb_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_HEADROOM; > > + > > + if (!zcopy) > > + skb_len += payload_len; > > + > > + skb = virtio_vsock_alloc_skb(skb_len, GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!skb) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + virtio_transport_init_hdr(skb, info, src_cid, src_port, > > + dst_cid, dst_port, > > + payload_len); > > + > > + /* Set owner here, because '__zerocopy_sg_from_iter()' uses > > + * owner of skb without check to update 'sk_wmem_alloc'. > > + */ > > + if (vsk) > > + skb_set_owner_w(skb, sk_vsock(vsk)); > > + > > + if (info->msg && payload_len > 0) { > > + int err; > > + > > + err = virtio_transport_fill_skb(skb, info, payload_len, zcopy); > > + if (err) > > + goto out; > > + > > + if (info->type == VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_SEQPACKET) { > > + struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb); > > + > > + hdr->flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM); > > + > > + if (info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_EOR) > > + hdr->flags |= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR); > > + } > > + } > > + > > + if (info->reply) > > + virtio_vsock_skb_set_reply(skb); > > + > > + trace_virtio_transport_alloc_pkt(src_cid, src_port, > > + dst_cid, dst_port, > > + payload_len, > > + info->type, > > + info->op, > > + info->flags); > > + > > + return skb; > > +out: > > + kfree_skb(skb); > > + return NULL; > > +} > > + > > /* This function can only be used on connecting/connected sockets, > > * since a socket assigned to a transport is required. > > * > > @@ -222,10 +335,12 @@ static u16 virtio_transport_get_type(struct sock *sk) > > static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > > struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info) > > { > > + u32 max_skb_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE; > > u32 src_cid, src_port, dst_cid, dst_port; > > const struct virtio_transport *t_ops; > > struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs; > > u32 pkt_len = info->pkt_len; > > + bool can_zcopy = false; > > u32 rest_len; > > int ret; > > > > @@ -254,15 +369,30 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > > if (pkt_len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW) > > return pkt_len; > > > > + if (info->msg) { > > + /* If zerocopy is not enabled by 'setsockopt()', we behave as > > + * there is no MSG_ZEROCOPY flag set. > > + */ > > + if (!sock_flag(sk_vsock(vsk), SOCK_ZEROCOPY)) > > + info->msg->msg_flags &= ~MSG_ZEROCOPY; > > + > > + if (info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_ZEROCOPY) > > + can_zcopy = virtio_transport_can_zcopy(info, pkt_len); > > + > > + if (can_zcopy) > > + max_skb_len = min_t(u32, VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE, > > + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS * PAGE_SIZE)); > > + } > > + > > rest_len = pkt_len; > > > > do { > > struct sk_buff *skb; > > size_t skb_len; > > > > - skb_len = min_t(u32, VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE, rest_len); > > + skb_len = min(max_skb_len, rest_len); > > > > - skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, skb_len, > > + skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(vsk, info, skb_len, can_zcopy, > > src_cid, src_port, > > dst_cid, dst_port); > > if (!skb) { > > @@ -270,6 +400,17 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk, > > break; > > } > > > > + /* This is last skb to send this portion of data. */ > > + if (info->msg && info->msg->msg_flags & MSG_ZEROCOPY && > > + skb_len == rest_len && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW) { > > + if (virtio_transport_init_zcopy_skb(vsk, skb, > > + info->msg, > > + can_zcopy)) { > > + ret = -ENOMEM; > > + break; > > + } > > + } > > + > > virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb); > > > > ret = t_ops->send_pkt(skb); > > @@ -934,7 +1075,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(const struct virtio_transport *t, > > if (!t) > > return -ENOTCONN; > > > > - reply = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(&info, 0, > > + reply = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(NULL, &info, 0, false, > > le64_to_cpu(hdr->dst_cid), > > le32_to_cpu(hdr->dst_port), > > le64_to_cpu(hdr->src_cid),
Stefano Garzarella
2023-Jul-25 12:53 UTC
[PATCH net-next v3 4/4] vsock/virtio: MSG_ZEROCOPY flag support
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 07:50:53AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:>On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 08:09:03AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >> >> >> On 21.07.2023 00:42, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >> > This adds handling of MSG_ZEROCOPY flag on transmission path: if this >> > flag is set and zerocopy transmission is possible (enabled in socket >> > options and transport allows zerocopy), then non-linear skb will be >> > created and filled with the pages of user's buffer. Pages of user's >> > buffer are locked in memory by 'get_user_pages()'. Second thing that >> > this patch does is replace type of skb owning: instead of calling >> > 'skb_set_owner_sk_safe()' it calls 'skb_set_owner_w()'. Reason of this >> > change is that '__zerocopy_sg_from_iter()' increments 'sk_wmem_alloc' >> > of socket, so to decrease this field correctly proper skb destructor is >> > needed: 'sock_wfree()'. This destructor is set by 'skb_set_owner_w()'. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov at sberdevices.ru> >> > --- >> > Changelog: >> > v5(big patchset) -> v1: >> > * Refactorings of 'if' conditions. >> > * Remove extra blank line. >> > * Remove 'frag_off' field unneeded init. >> > * Add function 'virtio_transport_fill_skb()' which fills both linear >> > and non-linear skb with provided data. >> > v1 -> v2: >> > * Use original order of last four arguments in 'virtio_transport_alloc_skb()'. >> > v2 -> v3: >> > * Add new transport callback: 'msgzerocopy_check_iov'. It checks that >> > provided 'iov_iter' with data could be sent in a zerocopy mode. >> > If this callback is not set in transport - transport allows to send >> > any 'iov_iter' in zerocopy mode. Otherwise - if callback returns 'true' >> > then zerocopy is allowed. Reason of this callback is that in case of >> > G2H transmission we insert whole skb to the tx virtio queue and such >> > skb must fit to the size of the virtio queue to be sent in a single >> > iteration (may be tx logic in 'virtio_transport.c' could be reworked >> > as in vhost to support partial send of current skb). This callback >> > will be enabled only for G2H path. For details pls see comment >> > 'Check that tx queue...' below. >> > >> > include/net/af_vsock.h | 3 + >> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 39 ++++ >> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 257 ++++++++++++++++++------ >> > 3 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h >> > index 0e7504a42925..a6b346eeeb8e 100644 >> > --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h >> > +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h >> > @@ -177,6 +177,9 @@ struct vsock_transport { >> > >> > /* Read a single skb */ >> > int (*read_skb)(struct vsock_sock *, skb_read_actor_t); >> > + >> > + /* Zero-copy. */ >> > + bool (*msgzerocopy_check_iov)(const struct iov_iter *); >> > }; >> > >> > /**** CORE ****/ >> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> > index 7bbcc8093e51..23cb8ed638c4 100644 >> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> > @@ -442,6 +442,43 @@ static void virtio_vsock_rx_done(struct virtqueue *vq) >> > queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work); >> > } >> > >> > +static bool virtio_transport_msgzerocopy_check_iov(const struct iov_iter *iov) >> > +{ >> > + struct virtio_vsock *vsock; >> > + bool res = false; >> > + >> > + rcu_read_lock(); >> > + >> > + vsock = rcu_dereference(the_virtio_vsock); >> > + if (vsock) { >> > + struct virtqueue *vq; >> > + int iov_pages; >> > + >> > + vq = vsock->vqs[VSOCK_VQ_TX]; >> > + >> > + iov_pages = round_up(iov->count, PAGE_SIZE) / PAGE_SIZE; >> > + >> > + /* Check that tx queue is large enough to keep whole >> > + * data to send. This is needed, because when there is >> > + * not enough free space in the queue, current skb to >> > + * send will be reinserted to the head of tx list of >> > + * the socket to retry transmission later, so if skb >> > + * is bigger than whole queue, it will be reinserted >> > + * again and again, thus blocking other skbs to be sent. >> > + * Each page of the user provided buffer will be added >> > + * as a single buffer to the tx virtqueue, so compare >> > + * number of pages against maximum capacity of the queue. >> > + * +1 means buffer for the packet header. >> > + */ >> > + if (iov_pages + 1 <= vq->num_max) >> >> I think this check is actual only for case one we don't have indirect buffer feature. >> With indirect mode whole data to send will be packed into one indirect buffer. >> >> Thanks, Arseniy > >Actually the reverse. With indirect you are limited to num_max. >Without you are limited to whatever space is left in the >queue (which you did not check here, so you should). > > >> > + res = true; >> > + } >> > + >> > + rcu_read_unlock(); > >Just curious: >is the point of all this RCU dance to allow vsock >to change from under us? then why is it ok to >have it change? the virtio_transport_msgzerocopy_check_iov >will then refer to the old vsock ...IIRC we introduced the RCU to handle hot-unplug issues: commit 0deab087b16a ("vsock/virtio: use RCU to avoid use-after-free on the_virtio_vsock") When we remove the device, we flush all the works, etc. so we should not be in this case (referring the old vsock), except for an irrelevant transient as the device is disappearing. Stefano