Virtualization - Feb 2023 - [RFC PATCH v1 12/12] test/vsock: MSG_ZEROCOPY support for vsock_perf

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 09:05:12AM +0000, Krasnov Arseniy
wrote:
>On 16.02.2023 18:29, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:06:32AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>> To use this option pass '--zc' parameter:
>>
>> --zerocopy or --zero-copy maybe better follow what we did with the
other parameters :-)
>>
>>>
>>> ./vsock_perf --zc --sender <cid> --port <port> --bytes
<bytes to send>
>>>
>>> With this option MSG_ZEROCOPY flag will be passed to the
'send()' call.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov at sberdevices.ru>
>>> ---
>>> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c | 127
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
>>> index a72520338f84..1d435be9b48e 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c
>>> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
>>> #include <poll.h>
>>> #include <sys/socket.h>
>>> #include <linux/vm_sockets.h>
>>> +#include <sys/mman.h>
>>> +#include <linux/errqueue.h>
>>>
>>> #define DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE_BYTES??? (128 * 1024)
>>> #define DEFAULT_TO_SEND_BYTES??? (64 * 1024)
>>> @@ -28,9 +30,14 @@
>>> #define BYTES_PER_GB??????? (1024 * 1024 * 1024ULL)
>>> #define NSEC_PER_SEC??????? (1000000000ULL)
>>>
>>> +#ifndef SOL_VSOCK
>>> +#define SOL_VSOCK 287
>>> +#endif
>>
>> I thought we use the current kernel headers when we compile the tests,
>> do we need to fix something in the makefile?
>Not sure, of course we are using uapi. But i see, that defines like SOL_XXX
is not
>defined in uapi headers. For example SOL_IP is defined in
include/linux/socket.h,
>but userspace app uses SOL_IP from in.h (at least on my machine). E.g.
SOL_XXX is
>not exported to user.
Right, I see only few SOL_* in the uapi, e.g. SOL_TIPC in 
uapi/linux/tipc.h

So it's fine for now, otherwise we can define it in 
uapi/linux/vm_sockets.h

Thanks,
Stefano