Stefano Garzarella
2023-Feb-16 15:29 UTC
[RFC PATCH v1 12/12] test/vsock: MSG_ZEROCOPY support for vsock_perf
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 07:06:32AM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:>To use this option pass '--zc' parameter:--zerocopy or --zero-copy maybe better follow what we did with the other parameters :-)> >./vsock_perf --zc --sender <cid> --port <port> --bytes <bytes to send> > >With this option MSG_ZEROCOPY flag will be passed to the 'send()' call. > >Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov at sberdevices.ru> >--- > tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c >index a72520338f84..1d435be9b48e 100644 >--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c >+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c >@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ > #include <poll.h> > #include <sys/socket.h> > #include <linux/vm_sockets.h> >+#include <sys/mman.h> >+#include <linux/errqueue.h> > > #define DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE_BYTES (128 * 1024) > #define DEFAULT_TO_SEND_BYTES (64 * 1024) >@@ -28,9 +30,14 @@ > #define BYTES_PER_GB (1024 * 1024 * 1024ULL) > #define NSEC_PER_SEC (1000000000ULL) > >+#ifndef SOL_VSOCK >+#define SOL_VSOCK 287 >+#endifI thought we use the current kernel headers when we compile the tests, do we need to fix something in the makefile?>+ > static unsigned int port = DEFAULT_PORT; > static unsigned long buf_size_bytes = DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE_BYTES; > static unsigned long vsock_buf_bytes = DEFAULT_VSOCK_BUF_BYTES; >+static bool zerocopy; > > static void error(const char *s) > { >@@ -247,15 +254,74 @@ static void run_receiver(unsigned long rcvlowat_bytes) > close(fd); > } > >+static void recv_completion(int fd) >+{ >+ struct sock_extended_err *serr; >+ char cmsg_data[128]; >+ struct cmsghdr *cm; >+ struct msghdr msg; >+ int ret; >+ >+ msg.msg_control = cmsg_data; >+ msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(cmsg_data); >+ >+ ret = recvmsg(fd, &msg, MSG_ERRQUEUE); >+ if (ret == -1) >+ return; >+ >+ cm = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg); >+ if (!cm) { >+ fprintf(stderr, "cmsg: no cmsg\n"); >+ return; >+ } >+ >+ if (cm->cmsg_level != SOL_VSOCK) { >+ fprintf(stderr, "cmsg: unexpected 'cmsg_level'\n"); >+ return; >+ } >+ >+ if (cm->cmsg_type) { >+ fprintf(stderr, "cmsg: unexpected 'cmsg_type'\n"); >+ return; >+ } >+ >+ serr = (void *)CMSG_DATA(cm); >+ if (serr->ee_origin != SO_EE_ORIGIN_ZEROCOPY) { >+ fprintf(stderr, "serr: wrong origin\n"); >+ return; >+ } >+ >+ if (serr->ee_errno) { >+ fprintf(stderr, "serr: wrong error code\n"); >+ return; >+ } >+ >+ if (zerocopy && (serr->ee_code & SO_EE_CODE_ZEROCOPY_COPIED)) >+ fprintf(stderr, "warning: copy instead of zerocopy\n"); >+} >+ >+static void enable_so_zerocopy(int fd) >+{ >+ int val = 1; >+ >+ if (setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ZEROCOPY, &val, sizeof(val))) >+ error("setsockopt(SO_ZEROCOPY)"); >+} >+ > static void run_sender(int peer_cid, unsigned long to_send_bytes) > { > time_t tx_begin_ns; > time_t tx_total_ns; > size_t total_send; >+ time_t time_in_send; > void *data; > int fd; > >- printf("Run as sender\n"); >+ if (zerocopy) >+ printf("Run as sender MSG_ZEROCOPY\n"); >+ else >+ printf("Run as sender\n"); >+ > printf("Connect to %i:%u\n", peer_cid, port); > printf("Send %lu bytes\n", to_send_bytes); > printf("TX buffer %lu bytes\n", buf_size_bytes); >@@ -265,25 +331,58 @@ static void run_sender(int peer_cid, unsigned long to_send_bytes) > if (fd < 0) > exit(EXIT_FAILURE); > >- data = malloc(buf_size_bytes); >+ if (zerocopy) { >+ enable_so_zerocopy(fd); > >- if (!data) { >- fprintf(stderr, "'malloc()' failed\n"); >- exit(EXIT_FAILURE); >+ data = mmap(NULL, buf_size_bytes, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, >+ MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); >+ if (data == MAP_FAILED) { >+ perror("mmap"); >+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE); >+ } >+ } else { >+ data = malloc(buf_size_bytes); >+ >+ if (!data) { >+ fprintf(stderr, "'malloc()' failed\n"); >+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE); >+ } > }Eventually to simplify the code I think we can use the mmaped buffer in both cases.> > memset(data, 0, buf_size_bytes); > total_send = 0; >+ time_in_send = 0; > tx_begin_ns = current_nsec(); > > while (total_send < to_send_bytes) { > ssize_t sent; >+ size_t rest_bytes; >+ time_t before; >+ >+ rest_bytes = to_send_bytes - total_send; > >- sent = write(fd, data, buf_size_bytes); >+ before = current_nsec(); >+ sent = send(fd, data, (rest_bytes > buf_size_bytes) ? >+ buf_size_bytes : rest_bytes, >+ zerocopy ? MSG_ZEROCOPY : 0); >+ time_in_send += (current_nsec() - before); > > if (sent <= 0) > error("write"); > >+ if (zerocopy) { >+ struct pollfd fds = { 0 }; >+ >+ fds.fd = fd;Which event are we waiting for here?>+ >+ if (poll(&fds, 1, -1) < 0) { >+ perror("poll"); >+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE); >+ }We need this because we use only one buffer, but if we use more than one, we could take full advantage of zerocopy, right? Otherwise, I don't think it's a fair comparison with non-zerocopy. Thanks, Stefano>+ >+ recv_completion(fd); >+ } >+ > total_send += sent; > } > >@@ -294,9 +393,14 @@ static void run_sender(int peer_cid, unsigned long to_send_bytes) > get_gbps(total_send * 8, tx_total_ns)); > printf("total time in 'write()': %f sec\n", > (float)tx_total_ns / NSEC_PER_SEC); >+ printf("time in send %f\n", (float)time_in_send / NSEC_PER_SEC); > > close(fd); >- free(data); >+ >+ if (zerocopy) >+ munmap(data, buf_size_bytes); >+ else >+ free(data); > } > > static const char optstring[] = ""; >@@ -336,6 +440,11 @@ static const struct option longopts[] = { > .has_arg = required_argument, > .val = 'R', > }, >+ { >+ .name = "zc", >+ .has_arg = no_argument, >+ .val = 'Z', >+ }, > {}, > }; > >@@ -351,6 +460,7 @@ static void usage(void) > " --help This message\n" > " --sender <cid> Sender mode (receiver default)\n" > " <cid> of the receiver to connect to\n" >+ " --zc Enable zerocopy\n" > " --port <port> Port (default %d)\n" > " --bytes <bytes>KMG Bytes to send (default %d)\n" > " --buf-size <bytes>KMG Data buffer size (default %d). In sender mode\n" >@@ -413,6 +523,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > case 'H': /* Help. */ > usage(); > break; >+ case 'Z': /* Zerocopy. */ >+ zerocopy = true; >+ break; > default: > usage(); > } >-- >2.25.1 >