Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-Feb-03 08:48 UTC
[PATCH 20/33] virtio_net: xsk: introduce virtnet_rq_bind_xsk_pool()
On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 07:00:45PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:> This function is used to bind or unbind xsk pool to virtnet rq. > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> > --- > drivers/net/virtio/Makefile | 2 +- > drivers/net/virtio/main.c | 8 ++--- > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h | 16 ++++++++++ > drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/Makefile b/drivers/net/virtio/Makefile > index 15ed7c97fd4f..8c2a884d2dba 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/Makefile > @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@ > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_NET) += virtio_net.o > > -virtio_net-y := main.o > +virtio_net-y := main.o xsk.o > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/main.c b/drivers/net/virtio/main.c > index 049a3bb9d88d..0ee23468b795 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/main.c > @@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ struct padded_vnet_hdr { > char padding[12]; > }; > > -static void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf); > static void virtnet_sq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf); > > static void *xdp_to_ptr(struct xdp_frame *ptr) > @@ -1351,8 +1350,7 @@ static int add_recvbuf_mergeable(struct virtnet_info *vi, > * before we're receiving packets, or from refill_work which is > * careful to disable receiving (using napi_disable). > */ > -static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, > - gfp_t gfp) > +bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp) > { > int err; > bool oom; > @@ -1388,7 +1386,7 @@ static void skb_recv_done(struct virtqueue *rvq) > virtqueue_napi_schedule(&rq->napi, rvq); > } > > -static void virtnet_napi_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, struct napi_struct *napi) > +void virtnet_napi_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, struct napi_struct *napi) > { > napi_enable(napi); > > @@ -3284,7 +3282,7 @@ static void virtnet_sq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf) > xdp_return_frame(ptr_to_xdp(buf)); > } > > -static void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf) > +void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf)If you are making this an API now you better document what it does. Same applies to other stuff you are making non-static.> { > struct virtnet_info *vi = vq->vdev->priv; > int i = vq2rxq(vq); > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h > index b46f083a630a..4a7633714802 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h > @@ -168,6 +168,12 @@ struct send_queue { > > /* Record whether sq is in reset state. */ > bool reset; > + > + struct { > + struct xsk_buff_pool __rcu *pool; > + > + dma_addr_t hdr_dma_address; > + } xsk; > }; > > /* Internal representation of a receive virtqueue */ > @@ -200,6 +206,13 @@ struct receive_queue { > char name[16]; > > struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq; > + > + struct { > + struct xsk_buff_pool __rcu *pool; > + > + /* xdp rxq used by xsk */ > + struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq; > + } xsk; > }; > > static inline bool is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(struct virtnet_info *vi, int q) > @@ -274,4 +287,7 @@ int virtnet_xdp_handler(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog, struct xdp_buff *xdp, > unsigned int *xdp_xmit, > struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats); > int virtnet_tx_reset(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct send_queue *sq); > +bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp); > +void virtnet_napi_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, struct napi_struct *napi); > +void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf); > #endif > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c b/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..e01ff2abea11 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c > @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > +/* > + * virtio-net xsk > + */ > + > +#include "virtio_net.h" > + > +static int virtnet_rq_bind_xsk_pool(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, > + struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct net_device *dev)This static function is unused after this patch, so compiler will complain. Yes it's just a warning but still not nice.> +{ > + bool running = netif_running(vi->dev); > + int err, qindex; > + > + qindex = rq - vi->rq; > + > + if (pool) { > + err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq, dev, qindex, rq->napi.napi_id); > + if (err < 0) > + return err; > + > + err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq, > + MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL, NULL); > + if (err < 0) { > + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq); > + return err; > + } > + > + xsk_pool_set_rxq_info(pool, &rq->xsk.xdp_rxq); > + } else { > + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq); > + } > + > + if (running) > + napi_disable(&rq->napi); > + > + err = virtqueue_reset(rq->vq, virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf); > + if (err) > + netdev_err(vi->dev, "reset rx fail: rx queue index: %d err: %d\n", qindex, err); > + > + if (pool) { > + if (err) > + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq); > + else > + rcu_assign_pointer(rq->xsk.pool, pool); > + } else { > + rcu_assign_pointer(rq->xsk.pool, NULL); > + } > + > + if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL)) > + schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0); > + > + if (running) > + virtnet_napi_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi); > + > + return err; > +} > -- > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
Xuan Zhuo
2023-Feb-03 08:52 UTC
[PATCH 20/33] virtio_net: xsk: introduce virtnet_rq_bind_xsk_pool()
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 03:48:33 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 07:00:45PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > This function is used to bind or unbind xsk pool to virtnet rq. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/virtio/Makefile | 2 +- > > drivers/net/virtio/main.c | 8 ++--- > > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h | 16 ++++++++++ > > drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/Makefile b/drivers/net/virtio/Makefile > > index 15ed7c97fd4f..8c2a884d2dba 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/Makefile > > @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@ > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIRTIO_NET) += virtio_net.o > > > > -virtio_net-y := main.o > > +virtio_net-y := main.o xsk.o > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/main.c b/drivers/net/virtio/main.c > > index 049a3bb9d88d..0ee23468b795 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/main.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/main.c > > @@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ struct padded_vnet_hdr { > > char padding[12]; > > }; > > > > -static void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf); > > static void virtnet_sq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf); > > > > static void *xdp_to_ptr(struct xdp_frame *ptr) > > @@ -1351,8 +1350,7 @@ static int add_recvbuf_mergeable(struct virtnet_info *vi, > > * before we're receiving packets, or from refill_work which is > > * careful to disable receiving (using napi_disable). > > */ > > -static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, > > - gfp_t gfp) > > +bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp) > > { > > int err; > > bool oom; > > @@ -1388,7 +1386,7 @@ static void skb_recv_done(struct virtqueue *rvq) > > virtqueue_napi_schedule(&rq->napi, rvq); > > } > > > > -static void virtnet_napi_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, struct napi_struct *napi) > > +void virtnet_napi_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, struct napi_struct *napi) > > { > > napi_enable(napi); > > > > @@ -3284,7 +3282,7 @@ static void virtnet_sq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf) > > xdp_return_frame(ptr_to_xdp(buf)); > > } > > > > -static void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf) > > +void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf) > > If you are making this an API now you better document > what it does. Same applies to other stuff you are > making non-static.I agree.> > > > { > > struct virtnet_info *vi = vq->vdev->priv; > > int i = vq2rxq(vq); > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h > > index b46f083a630a..4a7633714802 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_net.h > > @@ -168,6 +168,12 @@ struct send_queue { > > > > /* Record whether sq is in reset state. */ > > bool reset; > > + > > + struct { > > + struct xsk_buff_pool __rcu *pool; > > + > > + dma_addr_t hdr_dma_address; > > + } xsk; > > }; > > > > /* Internal representation of a receive virtqueue */ > > @@ -200,6 +206,13 @@ struct receive_queue { > > char name[16]; > > > > struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq; > > + > > + struct { > > + struct xsk_buff_pool __rcu *pool; > > + > > + /* xdp rxq used by xsk */ > > + struct xdp_rxq_info xdp_rxq; > > + } xsk; > > }; > > > > static inline bool is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(struct virtnet_info *vi, int q) > > @@ -274,4 +287,7 @@ int virtnet_xdp_handler(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog, struct xdp_buff *xdp, > > unsigned int *xdp_xmit, > > struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats); > > int virtnet_tx_reset(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct send_queue *sq); > > +bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp); > > +void virtnet_napi_enable(struct virtqueue *vq, struct napi_struct *napi); > > +void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf); > > #endif > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c b/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..e01ff2abea11 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/xsk.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > > +/* > > + * virtio-net xsk > > + */ > > + > > +#include "virtio_net.h" > > + > > +static int virtnet_rq_bind_xsk_pool(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, > > + struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct net_device *dev) > > This static function is unused after this patch, so compiler will > complain. Yes it's just a warning but still not nice.Otherwise, we need merge some patches, which will increase the difficulty of review. Is there a better way to deal with? Remove Static? Thanks.> > > > +{ > > + bool running = netif_running(vi->dev); > > + int err, qindex; > > + > > + qindex = rq - vi->rq; > > + > > + if (pool) { > > + err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq, dev, qindex, rq->napi.napi_id); > > + if (err < 0) > > + return err; > > + > > + err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq, > > + MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL, NULL); > > + if (err < 0) { > > + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq); > > + return err; > > + } > > + > > + xsk_pool_set_rxq_info(pool, &rq->xsk.xdp_rxq); > > + } else { > > + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq); > > + } > > + > > + if (running) > > + napi_disable(&rq->napi); > > + > > + err = virtqueue_reset(rq->vq, virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf); > > + if (err) > > + netdev_err(vi->dev, "reset rx fail: rx queue index: %d err: %d\n", qindex, err); > > + > > + if (pool) { > > + if (err) > > + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xsk.xdp_rxq); > > + else > > + rcu_assign_pointer(rq->xsk.pool, pool); > > + } else { > > + rcu_assign_pointer(rq->xsk.pool, NULL); > > + } > > + > > + if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL)) > > + schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0); > > + > > + if (running) > > + virtnet_napi_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi); > > + > > + return err; > > +} > > -- > > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f >