On 8/24/22 11:16, Alvaro Karsz wrote:> Hi Jason,
>
>> Or reset but can we simply use interrupt instead of the busy waiting?
>
> I agree that timeouts are not needed using interrupts.
Quite the contrary.
There is no guarantee that a completion for a given command will be
signaled at all; if the completion is never posted to the virtio queue
the VM will spin forever.
> This can be done, but seems like a big change.
> All functions calling virtnet_send_command expect to get a response
immediately.
> This may be difficult, since some of the commands are sent in the
> probe function.
This is a simplistic approach. _Any_ command sent via virtio will have
to have some sort of handling in the host, so an immediate response is
not guaranteed.
Especially virtio-block command will _not_ be handled immediately.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare at suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg
HRB 36809 (AG N?rnberg), GF: Felix Imend?rffer