Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-Aug-04 07:10 UTC
[virtio-dev] [PATCH] virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big packets
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 01:00:46PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 12:47 PM Gavin Li <gavinl at nvidia.com> wrote: > > > > Currently add_recvbuf_big() allocates MAX_SKB_FRAGS segments for big > > packets even when GUEST_* offloads are not present on the device. > > However, if GSO is not supported, it would be sufficient to allocate > > segments to cover just up the MTU size and no further. Allocating the > > maximum amount of segments results in a large waste of buffer space in > > the queue, which limits the number of packets that can be buffered and > > can result in reduced performance. > > > > Therefore, if GSO is not supported, use the MTU to calculate the > > optimal amount of segments required. > > > > Below is the iperf TCP test results over a Mellanox NIC, using vDPA for > > 1 VQ, queue size 1024, before and after the change, with the iperf > > server running over the virtio-net interface. > > > > MTU(Bytes)/Bandwidth (Gbit/s) > > Before After > > 1500 22.5 22.4 > > 9000 12.8 25.9 > > > > Signed-off-by: Gavin Li <gavinl at nvidia.com> > > Reviewed-by: Gavi Teitz <gavi at nvidia.com> > > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav at nvidia.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > index ec8e1b3108c3..d36918c1809d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > @@ -222,6 +222,9 @@ struct virtnet_info { > > /* I like... big packets and I cannot lie! */ > > bool big_packets; > > > > + /* Indicates GSO support */ > > + bool gso_is_supported; > > + > > /* Host will merge rx buffers for big packets (shake it! shake it!) */ > > bool mergeable_rx_bufs; > > > > @@ -1312,14 +1315,21 @@ static int add_recvbuf_small(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, > > static int add_recvbuf_big(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, > > gfp_t gfp) > > { > > + unsigned int sg_num = MAX_SKB_FRAGS; > > struct page *first, *list = NULL; > > char *p; > > int i, err, offset; > > > > - sg_init_table(rq->sg, MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2); > > + if (!vi->gso_is_supported) { > > + unsigned int mtu = vi->dev->mtu; > > + > > + sg_num = (mtu % PAGE_SIZE) ? mtu / PAGE_SIZE + 1 : mtu / PAGE_SIZE; > > + } > > + > > + sg_init_table(rq->sg, sg_num + 2); > > > > /* page in rq->sg[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1] is list tail */ > > - for (i = MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1; i > 1; --i) { > > + for (i = sg_num + 1; i > 1; --i) { > > first = get_a_page(rq, gfp); > > if (!first) { > > if (list) > > @@ -1350,7 +1360,7 @@ static int add_recvbuf_big(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, > > > > /* chain first in list head */ > > first->private = (unsigned long)list; > > - err = virtqueue_add_inbuf(rq->vq, rq->sg, MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2, > > + err = virtqueue_add_inbuf(rq->vq, rq->sg, sg_num + 2, > > first, gfp); > > if (err < 0) > > give_pages(rq, first); > > @@ -3571,8 +3581,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) || > > virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) || > > virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) || > > - virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO)) > > + virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO)) { > > vi->big_packets = true; > > + vi->gso_is_supported = true; > > Why not simply re-use big_packets here? > > ThanksI don't get this question. The patch does use big_packets, it wants to figure out guest GSO is off so MTU limits the size. The name "gso_is_supported" is confusing, should be e.g. guest_gso.> > + } > > > > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) > > vi->mergeable_rx_bufs = true; > > -- > > 2.31.1 > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe at lists.oasis-open.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help at lists.oasis-open.org > >
Jason Wang
2022-Aug-04 07:23 UTC
[virtio-dev] [PATCH] virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big packets
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 3:10 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 01:00:46PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 12:47 PM Gavin Li <gavinl at nvidia.com> wrote: > > > > > > Currently add_recvbuf_big() allocates MAX_SKB_FRAGS segments for big > > > packets even when GUEST_* offloads are not present on the device. > > > However, if GSO is not supported, it would be sufficient to allocate > > > segments to cover just up the MTU size and no further. Allocating the > > > maximum amount of segments results in a large waste of buffer space in > > > the queue, which limits the number of packets that can be buffered and > > > can result in reduced performance. > > > > > > Therefore, if GSO is not supported, use the MTU to calculate the > > > optimal amount of segments required. > > > > > > Below is the iperf TCP test results over a Mellanox NIC, using vDPA for > > > 1 VQ, queue size 1024, before and after the change, with the iperf > > > server running over the virtio-net interface. > > > > > > MTU(Bytes)/Bandwidth (Gbit/s) > > > Before After > > > 1500 22.5 22.4 > > > 9000 12.8 25.9 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Gavin Li <gavinl at nvidia.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Gavi Teitz <gavi at nvidia.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav at nvidia.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > index ec8e1b3108c3..d36918c1809d 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > @@ -222,6 +222,9 @@ struct virtnet_info { > > > /* I like... big packets and I cannot lie! */ > > > bool big_packets; > > > > > > + /* Indicates GSO support */ > > > + bool gso_is_supported; > > > + > > > /* Host will merge rx buffers for big packets (shake it! shake it!) */ > > > bool mergeable_rx_bufs; > > > > > > @@ -1312,14 +1315,21 @@ static int add_recvbuf_small(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, > > > static int add_recvbuf_big(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, > > > gfp_t gfp) > > > { > > > + unsigned int sg_num = MAX_SKB_FRAGS; > > > struct page *first, *list = NULL; > > > char *p; > > > int i, err, offset; > > > > > > - sg_init_table(rq->sg, MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2); > > > + if (!vi->gso_is_supported) { > > > + unsigned int mtu = vi->dev->mtu; > > > + > > > + sg_num = (mtu % PAGE_SIZE) ? mtu / PAGE_SIZE + 1 : mtu / PAGE_SIZE; > > > + } > > > + > > > + sg_init_table(rq->sg, sg_num + 2); > > > > > > /* page in rq->sg[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1] is list tail */ > > > - for (i = MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1; i > 1; --i) { > > > + for (i = sg_num + 1; i > 1; --i) { > > > first = get_a_page(rq, gfp); > > > if (!first) { > > > if (list) > > > @@ -1350,7 +1360,7 @@ static int add_recvbuf_big(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq, > > > > > > /* chain first in list head */ > > > first->private = (unsigned long)list; > > > - err = virtqueue_add_inbuf(rq->vq, rq->sg, MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2, > > > + err = virtqueue_add_inbuf(rq->vq, rq->sg, sg_num + 2, > > > first, gfp); > > > if (err < 0) > > > give_pages(rq, first); > > > @@ -3571,8 +3581,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) || > > > virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) || > > > virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) || > > > - virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO)) > > > + virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO)) { > > > vi->big_packets = true; > > > + vi->gso_is_supported = true; > > > > Why not simply re-use big_packets here? > > > > Thanks > > I don't get this question. The patch does use big_packets, it wants > to figure out guest GSO is off so MTU limits the size.Yes. Thanks> The name "gso_is_supported" is confusing, should be e.g. guest_gso. > > > > > + } > > > > > > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) > > > vi->mergeable_rx_bufs = true; > > > -- > > > 2.31.1 > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe at lists.oasis-open.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help at lists.oasis-open.org > > > >