Tian, Kevin
2022-Jun-16 07:08 UTC
[PATCH v2 5/5] vfio/iommu_type1: Simplify group attachment
> From: Nicolin Chen > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2022 8:03 AM > > Un-inline the domain specific logic from the attach/detach_group ops into > two paired functions vfio_iommu_alloc_attach_domain() and > vfio_iommu_detach_destroy_domain() that strictly deal with creating and > destroying struct vfio_domains. > > Add the logic to check for EMEDIUMTYPE return code of > iommu_attach_group() > and avoid the extra domain allocations and attach/detach sequences of the > old code. This allows properly detecting an actual attach error, like > -ENOMEM, vs treating all attach errors as an incompatible domain. > > Co-developed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com> > Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc at nvidia.com> > --- > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 298 +++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 163 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-) >...> +static struct vfio_domain * > +vfio_iommu_alloc_attach_domain(struct bus_type *bus, struct vfio_iommu > *iommu, > + struct vfio_iommu_group *group) > +{ > + struct iommu_domain *new_domain; > + struct vfio_domain *domain; > + int ret = 0; > + > + /* Try to match an existing compatible domain */ > + list_for_each_entry (domain, &iommu->domain_list, next) { > + ret = iommu_attach_group(domain->domain, group- > >iommu_group); > + if (ret == -EMEDIUMTYPE) > + continue;Probably good to add one line comment here for what EMEDIUMTYPE represents. It's not a widely-used retry type like EAGAIN. A comment can save the time of digging out the fact by jumping to iommu file. ...> - if (resv_msi) { > + if (resv_msi && !domain->msi_cookie) { > ret = iommu_get_msi_cookie(domain->domain, > resv_msi_base); > if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) > goto out_detach; > + domain->msi_cookie = true; > }why not moving to alloc_attach_domain() then no need for the new domain field? It's required only when a new domain is allocated. ...> - if (list_empty(&domain->group_list)) { > - if (list_is_singular(&iommu->domain_list)) { > - if (list_empty(&iommu- > >emulated_iommu_groups)) { > - WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head); > - > vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu); > - } else { > - > vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_reaccount(iommu); > - } > - } > - iommu_domain_free(domain->domain); > - list_del(&domain->next); > - kfree(domain); > - vfio_iommu_aper_expand(iommu, &iova_copy);Previously the aperture is adjusted when a domain is freed...> - vfio_update_pgsize_bitmap(iommu); > - } > - /* > - * Removal of a group without dirty tracking may allow > - * the iommu scope to be promoted. > - */ > - if (!group->pinned_page_dirty_scope) { > - iommu->num_non_pinned_groups--; > - if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking) > - vfio_iommu_populate_bitmap_full(iommu); > - } > + vfio_iommu_detach_destroy_domain(domain, iommu, > group); > kfree(group); > break; > } > > + vfio_iommu_aper_expand(iommu, &iova_copy);but now it's done for every group detach. The aperture is decided by domain geometry which is not affected by attached groups.