Thomas Gleixner
2022-May-20 23:25 UTC
[PATCH v2] x86/vmware: use unsigned integer for shifting
On Fri, May 20 2022 at 19:39, Shreenidhi Shedi wrote:> From: Shreenidhi Shedi <yesshedi at gmail.com> > > From: Shreenidhi Shedi <sshedi at vmware.com>Can you please decide which of your personalities wrote that patch?> Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is implementation-defined > behaviour. Using unsigned is better option for this.Better option? There are no options. It's either correct or not. Please be precise and technical in your wording.> Fixes: 4cca6ea04d31 ("x86/apic: Allow x2apic without IR on VMware platform") > > Signed-off-by: Shreenidhi Shedi <sshedi at vmware.com>Please keep the tags together. This extra new line is pointless and makes the maintainer do extra work to remove it. Documentation/process/* has all the relevant directives for you. Following them is not an option. It's mandatory.> @@ -476,8 +477,8 @@ static bool __init vmware_legacy_x2apic_available(void) > { > uint32_t eax, ebx, ecx, edx; > VMWARE_CMD(GETVCPU_INFO, eax, ebx, ecx, edx); > - return (eax & (1 << VMWARE_CMD_VCPU_RESERVED)) == 0 && > - (eax & (1 << VMWARE_CMD_LEGACY_X2APIC)) != 0; > + return !(eax & BIT(VMWARE_CMD_VCPU_RESERVED)) && > + (eax & BIT(VMWARE_CMD_LEGACY_X2APIC))Testing your changes before submission is not optional either. How is this supposed to compile? Thanks, tglx