Jason Wang
2022-Apr-27 04:05 UTC
[PATCH v2 2/2] vdpa/vp_vdpa : add vdpa tool support in vp_vdpa
? 2022/4/27 09:58, Cindy Lu ??:> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 2:05 PM Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 2:27 PM Cindy Lu <lulu at redhat.com> wrote: >>> this patch is to add the support for vdpa tool in vp_vdpa >>> here is the example steps >>> >>> modprobe vp_vdpa >>> modprobe vhost_vdpa >>> echo 0000:00:06.0>/sys/bus/pci/drivers/virtio-pci/unbind >>> echo 1af4 1041 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/vp-vdpa/new_id >>> >>> vdpa dev add name vdpa1 mgmtdev pci/0000:00:06.0 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu at redhat.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++------- >>> 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c >>> index cce101e6a940..873402977543 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c >>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c >>> @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ struct vp_vring { >>> >>> struct vp_vdpa { >>> struct vdpa_device vdpa; >>> - struct virtio_pci_modern_device mdev; >>> + /* this is an pointer point to the mdev in vp_vdpa_mgmtdev*/ >>> + struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev; >> The code can explain itself, so the comment is redundant. >> > sure wll remove this. >>> struct vp_vring *vring; >>> struct vdpa_callback config_cb; >>> char msix_name[VP_VDPA_NAME_SIZE]; >>> @@ -41,6 +42,12 @@ struct vp_vdpa { >>> int vectors; >>> }; >>> >>> +struct vp_vdpa_mgmtdev { >>> + struct vdpa_mgmt_dev mgtdev; >>> + struct virtio_pci_modern_device mdev; >> I think coupling it with mgmt device is probably not good, any reason >> we can't allocate it independently? >> > yes I also think it make code confused, but we need to init it in > static int vp_vdpa_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id) > and then pass it to > static int vp_vdpa_dev_add(struct vdpa_mgmt_dev *v_mdev, const char *name, > const struct vdpa_dev_set_config *add_config) > the only struct we can use is struct vdpa_mgmt_dev *v_mdev, not sure > if we have > some better choice ?I think we can just allocate it and assign it to vdpa_mgmt_dev structure? struct vp_vdpa_mgmtdev { ??? stuct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev; }; Thanks> >> Thanks >> >>> + struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa; >>> +};