On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:21:26 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote:> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 3:52 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:14:31 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 4:14 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Sets the default maximum ring num based on virtio_set_max_ring_num(). > > > > > > > > The default maximum ring num is 1024. > > > > > > Having a default value is pretty useful, I see 32K is used by default for IFCVF. > > > > > > Rethink this, how about having a different default value based on the speed? > > > > > > Without SPEED_DUPLEX, we use 1024. Otherwise > > > > > > 10g 4096 > > > 40g 8192 > > > > We can define different default values of tx and rx by the way. This way I can > > just use it in the new interface of find_vqs(). > > > > without SPEED_DUPLEX: tx 512 rx 1024 > > > > Any reason that TX is smaller than RX? >I've seen some NIC drivers with default tx smaller than rx. One problem I have now is that inside virtnet_probe, init_vqs is before getting speed/duplex. I'm not sure, can the logic to get speed/duplex be put before init_vqs? Is there any risk? Can you help me? Thanks.> Thanks > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > etc. > > > > > > (The number are just copied from the 10g/40g default parameter from > > > other vendors) > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > > index a4ffd7cdf623..77e61fe0b2ce 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ module_param(napi_tx, bool, 0644); > > > > #define GOOD_PACKET_LEN (ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN + ETH_DATA_LEN) > > > > #define GOOD_COPY_LEN 128 > > > > > > > > +#define VIRTNET_DEFAULT_MAX_RING_NUM 1024 > > > > + > > > > #define VIRTNET_RX_PAD (NET_IP_ALIGN + NET_SKB_PAD) > > > > > > > > /* Amount of XDP headroom to prepend to packets for use by xdp_adjust_head */ > > > > @@ -3045,6 +3047,8 @@ static int virtnet_find_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi) > > > > ctx[rxq2vq(i)] = true; > > > > } > > > > > > > > + virtio_set_max_ring_num(vi->vdev, VIRTNET_DEFAULT_MAX_RING_NUM); > > > > + > > > > ret = virtio_find_vqs_ctx(vi->vdev, total_vqs, vqs, callbacks, > > > > names, ctx, NULL); > > > > if (ret) > > > > -- > > > > 2.31.0 > > > > > > > > > >
Jason Wang
2022-Feb-21 03:40 UTC
[PATCH v5 20/22] virtio_net: set the default max ring num
? 2022/2/17 ??5:30, Xuan Zhuo ??:> On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:21:26 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 3:52 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:14:31 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 4:14 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: >>>>> Sets the default maximum ring num based on virtio_set_max_ring_num(). >>>>> >>>>> The default maximum ring num is 1024. >>>> Having a default value is pretty useful, I see 32K is used by default for IFCVF. >>>> >>>> Rethink this, how about having a different default value based on the speed? >>>> >>>> Without SPEED_DUPLEX, we use 1024. Otherwise >>>> >>>> 10g 4096 >>>> 40g 8192 >>> We can define different default values of tx and rx by the way. This way I can >>> just use it in the new interface of find_vqs(). >>> >>> without SPEED_DUPLEX: tx 512 rx 1024 >>> >> Any reason that TX is smaller than RX? >> > I've seen some NIC drivers with default tx smaller than rx.Interesting, do they use combined channels?> > One problem I have now is that inside virtnet_probe, init_vqs is before getting > speed/duplex. I'm not sure, can the logic to get speed/duplex be put before > init_vqs? Is there any risk? > > Can you help me?The feature has been negotiated during probe(), so I don't see any risk. Thanks> > Thanks. > >> Thanks >> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>>> etc. >>>> >>>> (The number are just copied from the 10g/40g default parameter from >>>> other vendors) >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c >>>>> index a4ffd7cdf623..77e61fe0b2ce 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c >>>>> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ module_param(napi_tx, bool, 0644); >>>>> #define GOOD_PACKET_LEN (ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN + ETH_DATA_LEN) >>>>> #define GOOD_COPY_LEN 128 >>>>> >>>>> +#define VIRTNET_DEFAULT_MAX_RING_NUM 1024 >>>>> + >>>>> #define VIRTNET_RX_PAD (NET_IP_ALIGN + NET_SKB_PAD) >>>>> >>>>> /* Amount of XDP headroom to prepend to packets for use by xdp_adjust_head */ >>>>> @@ -3045,6 +3047,8 @@ static int virtnet_find_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi) >>>>> ctx[rxq2vq(i)] = true; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> + virtio_set_max_ring_num(vi->vdev, VIRTNET_DEFAULT_MAX_RING_NUM); >>>>> + >>>>> ret = virtio_find_vqs_ctx(vi->vdev, total_vqs, vqs, callbacks, >>>>> names, ctx, NULL); >>>>> if (ret) >>>>> -- >>>>> 2.31.0 >>>>>