Virtualization - Nov 2021 - [PATCH v3 1/3] MAINTAINERS: Update maintainers for paravirt ops and VMware hypervisor interface

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 07:50:39AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:08:16PM -0800, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> > From: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa at csail.mit.edu>
> > 
> > Deep has decided to transfer maintainership of the VMware hypervisor
> > interface to Srivatsa, and the joint-maintainership of paravirt ops in
> > the Linux kernel to Srivatsa and Alexey. Update the MAINTAINERS file
> > to reflect this change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa at
csail.mit.edu>
> > Acked-by: Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov at vmware.com>
> > Acked-by: Deep Shah <sdeep at vmware.com>
> > Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com>
> > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> 
> Why are MAINTAINERS updates needed for stable?  That's not normal :(
So that people posting bug-fixes / backports to these subsystems for
older kernels (stable and LTS releases) will CC the new subsystem
maintainers. That's why I added CC stable tag only to the first two
patches which add/replace maintainers and not the third patch which is
just a cleanup.

Regards,
Srivatsa

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 07:39:16AM -0800, Srivatsa S. Bhat
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 07:50:39AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:08:16PM -0800, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> > > From: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa at csail.mit.edu>
> > > 
> > > Deep has decided to transfer maintainership of the VMware
hypervisor
> > > interface to Srivatsa, and the joint-maintainership of paravirt
ops in
> > > the Linux kernel to Srivatsa and Alexey. Update the MAINTAINERS
file
> > > to reflect this change.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa at
csail.mit.edu>
> > > Acked-by: Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov at vmware.com>
> > > Acked-by: Deep Shah <sdeep at vmware.com>
> > > Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com>
> > > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> > 
> > Why are MAINTAINERS updates needed for stable?  That's not normal
:(
> 
> So that people posting bug-fixes / backports to these subsystems for
> older kernels (stable and LTS releases) will CC the new subsystem
> maintainers.
That's not how stable releases work at all.
> That's why I added CC stable tag only to the first two
> patches which add/replace maintainers and not the third patch which is
> just a cleanup.
Patches for stable kernels need to go into Linus's tree first, and if
you have the MAINTAINERS file updated properly there, then you will be
properly cc:ed.  We do not look at the MAINTAINERS file for the older
kernel when sending patches out, it's totally ignored as that was the
snapshot at a point in time, which is usually no longer the true state.

So this would have no affect at all, sorry.  That's why I asked if you
all really realized what you were doing here :)

thanks,

greg k-h