[ add sfr ]
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 9:41 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
wrote:>
> Hi Dan,
>
> this series cleans up and simplifies the association between DAX and block
> devices in preparation of allowing to mount file systems directly on DAX
> devices without a detour through block devices.
So I notice that this is based on linux-next while libnvdimm-for-next
is based on v5.15-rc4. Since I'm not Andrew I went ahead and rebased
these onto v5.15-rc4, tested that, and then merged with linux-next to
resolve the conflicts and tested again.
My merge resolution is here [1]. Christoph, please have a look. The
rebase and the merge result are both passing my test and I'm now going
to review the individual patches. However, while I do that and collect
acks from DM and EROFS folks, I want to give Stephen a heads up that
this is coming. Primarily I want to see if someone sees a better
strategy to merge this, please let me know, but if not I plan to walk
Stephen and Linus through the resolution.
[1]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djbw/nvdimm.git/commit/?id=c3894cf6eb8f
>
> Diffstat:
> drivers/dax/Kconfig | 4
> drivers/dax/bus.c | 2
> drivers/dax/super.c | 220
+++++--------------------------------------
> drivers/md/dm-linear.c | 51 +++------
> drivers/md/dm-log-writes.c | 44 +++-----
> drivers/md/dm-stripe.c | 65 +++---------
> drivers/md/dm-table.c | 22 ++--
> drivers/md/dm-writecache.c | 2
> drivers/md/dm.c | 29 -----
> drivers/md/dm.h | 4
> drivers/nvdimm/Kconfig | 2
> drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 9 -
> drivers/s390/block/Kconfig | 2
> drivers/s390/block/dcssblk.c | 12 +-
> fs/dax.c | 13 ++
> fs/erofs/super.c | 11 +-
> fs/ext2/super.c | 6 -
> fs/ext4/super.c | 9 +
> fs/fuse/Kconfig | 2
> fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 2
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 54 +++++-----
> include/linux/dax.h | 30 ++---
> 22 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 410 deletions(-)