Stefano Garzarella
2021-Jul-20 08:13 UTC
[PATCH v1] vdpa/vdpa_sim: Use the negotiated features when calling vringh_init_iotlb
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:14:35AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote:>On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 08:57:40AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 08:25:33AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: >> > When calling vringh_init_iotlb(), use the negotiated features which >> > might be different than the supported features. >> > >> > Fixes: 2c53d0f64c06f ("vdpasim: vDPA device simulator") >> > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com> >> > --- >> > v0 --> v1: >> > Update "Fixes" line >> > >> > drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c | 4 ++-- >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c >> > index 14e024de5cbf..89a474c7a096 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c >> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c >> > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static void vdpasim_queue_ready(struct vdpasim *vdpasim, unsigned int idx) >> > { >> > struct vdpasim_virtqueue *vq = &vdpasim->vqs[idx]; >> > >> > - vringh_init_iotlb(&vq->vring, vdpasim->dev_attr.supported_features, >> > + vringh_init_iotlb(&vq->vring, vdpasim->features, >> > VDPASIM_QUEUE_MAX, false, >> > (struct vring_desc *)(uintptr_t)vq->desc_addr, >> > (struct vring_avail *) >> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static void vdpasim_vq_reset(struct vdpasim *vdpasim, >> > vq->device_addr = 0; >> > vq->cb = NULL; >> > vq->private = NULL; >> > - vringh_init_iotlb(&vq->vring, vdpasim->dev_attr.supported_features, >> > + vringh_init_iotlb(&vq->vring, vdpasim->features, >> >> vdpasim_vq_reset() is called while resetting the device in vdpasim_reset() >> where we also set `vdpasim->features = 0` after resetting the vqs, so maybe >> it's better to use the supported features here, since the negotiated ones >> are related to the previous instance. >> > >I don't think using supported features is valid. Better to make sure >vringh_init_iotlb() is called after the features have been negotiated. >I think the vringh_init_iotlb() call in vdpasim_vq_reset() is just used to clean up the `struct vringh`, then it will be initialized in vdpasim_queue_ready() when features have already been negotiated. Maybe here we can pass 0 (to the features parameter) if we don't want to use the features supported by the device. Thanks, Stefano
Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-Aug-10 15:55 UTC
[PATCH v1] vdpa/vdpa_sim: Use the negotiated features when calling vringh_init_iotlb
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:13:27AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:14:35AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 08:57:40AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 08:25:33AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > > When calling vringh_init_iotlb(), use the negotiated features which > > > > might be different than the supported features. > > > > > > > > Fixes: 2c53d0f64c06f ("vdpasim: vDPA device simulator") > > > > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com> > > > > --- > > > > v0 --> v1: > > > > Update "Fixes" line > > > > > > > > drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c | 4 ++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c > > > > index 14e024de5cbf..89a474c7a096 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c > > > > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static void vdpasim_queue_ready(struct vdpasim *vdpasim, unsigned int idx) > > > > { > > > > struct vdpasim_virtqueue *vq = &vdpasim->vqs[idx]; > > > > > > > > - vringh_init_iotlb(&vq->vring, vdpasim->dev_attr.supported_features, > > > > + vringh_init_iotlb(&vq->vring, vdpasim->features, > > > > VDPASIM_QUEUE_MAX, false, > > > > (struct vring_desc *)(uintptr_t)vq->desc_addr, > > > > (struct vring_avail *) > > > > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static void vdpasim_vq_reset(struct vdpasim *vdpasim, > > > > vq->device_addr = 0; > > > > vq->cb = NULL; > > > > vq->private = NULL; > > > > - vringh_init_iotlb(&vq->vring, vdpasim->dev_attr.supported_features, > > > > + vringh_init_iotlb(&vq->vring, vdpasim->features, > > > > > > vdpasim_vq_reset() is called while resetting the device in vdpasim_reset() > > > where we also set `vdpasim->features = 0` after resetting the vqs, so maybe > > > it's better to use the supported features here, since the negotiated ones > > > are related to the previous instance. > > > > > > > I don't think using supported features is valid. Better to make sure > > vringh_init_iotlb() is called after the features have been negotiated. > > > > I think the vringh_init_iotlb() call in vdpasim_vq_reset() is just used to > clean up the `struct vringh`, then it will be initialized in > vdpasim_queue_ready() when features have already been negotiated. > > Maybe here we can pass 0 (to the features parameter) if we don't want to use > the features supported by the device. > > Thanks, > StefanoEli? Maybe you can describe what is the observed bug the patch is trying to fix. Thanks! -- MST