Virtualization - Aug 2021 - [PATCH v10 05/17] vhost-vdpa: Fail the vhost_vdpa_set_status() on reset failure

? 2021/8/3 ??5:50, Yongji Xie ??:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 4:10 PM Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
wrote:
>>
>> ? 2021/7/29 ??3:34, Xie Yongji ??:
>>> Re-read the device status to ensure it's set to zero during
>>> resetting. Otherwise, fail the vhost_vdpa_set_status() after
timeout.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji at bytedance.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>>>    1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>>> index b07aa161f7ad..dd05c1e1133c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>>> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct
vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp)
>>>        struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
>>>        const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
>>>        u8 status, status_old;
>>> -     int nvqs = v->nvqs;
>>> +     int timeout = 0, nvqs = v->nvqs;
>>>        u16 i;
>>>
>>>        if (copy_from_user(&status, statusp, sizeof(status)))
>>> @@ -173,6 +173,15 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct
vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp)
>>>                return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>>        ops->set_status(vdpa, status);
>>> +     if (status == 0) {
>>> +             while (ops->get_status(vdpa)) {
>>> +                     timeout += 20;
>>> +                     if (timeout > VDPA_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS)
>>> +                             return -EIO;
>>> +
>>> +                     msleep(20);
>>> +             }
>>
>> Spec has introduced the reset a one of the basic facility. And consider
>> we differ reset here.
>>
>> This makes me think if it's better to introduce a dedicated vdpa
ops for
>> reset?
>>
> Do you mean replace the ops.set_status(vdev, 0) with the ops.reset()?
> Then we can remove the timeout processing which is device specific
> stuff.

Exactly.

Thanks

>
> Thanks,
> Yongji
>