Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-Jul-14 14:25 UTC
[virtio-dev] Fwd: [PATCH v2] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk lifetime metrics
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:36:58AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:> On Wed, Jul 14 2021, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:37:26PM -0700, Enrico Granata wrote: > >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- > >> From: Enrico Granata <egranata at google.com> > >> Date: Wed, May 5, 2021 at 1:37 PM > >> Subject: [PATCH v2] Provide detailed specification of virtio-blk > >> lifetime metrics > >> To: <virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org> > >> Cc: <egranata at google.com>, <hch at infradead.org>, <mst at redhat.com>, > >> <linux-block at vger.kernel.org>, > >> <virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org> > >> > >> > >> In the course of review, some concerns were surfaced about the > >> original virtio-blk lifetime proposal, as it depends on the eMMC > >> spec which is not open > >> > >> Add a more detailed description of the meaning of the fields > >> added by that proposal to the virtio-blk specification, as to > >> make it feasible to understand and implement the new lifetime > >> metrics feature without needing to refer to JEDEC's specification > >> > >> This patch does not change the meaning of those fields nor add > >> any new fields, but it is intended to provide an open and more > >> clear description of the meaning associated with those fields. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata <egranata at google.com> > >> --- > >> Changes in v2: > >> - clarified JEDEC references; > >> - added VIRTIO_BLK prefix and cleaned up comment syntax; > >> - clarified reserved block references > >> > >> content.tex | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > >> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > Ping? > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> > > [Enrico is currently on leave of absence] > > Is there any outstanding feedback from the linux-block folks? I've lost > track of this, I'm afraid. (Your R-b is the only feedback I see on this > list...) > > We can certainly put up a vote. This is one of the things I wanted to > see fixed for the next release of the standard.I have CCed Christoph, linux-block@, and virtualization at . Here is the link to the patch that we're discussing: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-block/patch/20210505193655.2414268-1-egranata at google.com/ Stefan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20210714/5d82a4c4/attachment.sig>