Juergen Gross
2017-Sep-06 17:36 UTC
[PATCH v3 0/2] guard virt_spin_lock() with a static key
With virt_spin_lock() being guarded by a static key the bare metal case
can be optimized by patching the call away completely. In case a kernel
running as a guest it can decide whether to use paravitualized
spinlocks, the current fallback to the unfair test-and-set scheme, or
to mimic the bare metal behavior.
V3:
- remove test for hypervisor environment from virt_spin_lock(9 as
suggested by Waiman Long
V2:
- use static key instead of making virt_spin_lock() a pvops function
Juergen Gross (2):
paravirt/locks: use new static key for controlling call of
virt_spin_lock()
paravirt,xen: correct xen_nopvspin case
arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 11 ++++++++++-
arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c | 6 ++++++
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 ++
arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 2 ++
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 4 ++++
5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
2.12.3
Juergen Gross
2017-Sep-06 17:36 UTC
[PATCH v3 1/2] paravirt/locks: use new static key for controlling call of virt_spin_lock()
There are cases where a guest tries to switch spinlocks to bare metal
behavior (e.g. by setting "xen_nopvspin" boot parameter). Today this
has the downside of falling back to unfair test and set scheme for
qspinlocks due to virt_spin_lock() detecting the virtualized
environment.
Add a static key controlling whether virt_spin_lock() should be
called or not. When running on bare metal set the new key to false.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 11 ++++++++++-
arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c | 6 ++++++
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 ++
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 4 ++++
4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
index 48a706f641f2..308dfd0714c7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
#ifndef _ASM_X86_QSPINLOCK_H
#define _ASM_X86_QSPINLOCK_H
+#include <linux/jump_label.h>
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h>
#include <asm/paravirt.h>
@@ -46,10 +47,14 @@ static inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock
*lock)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(virt_spin_lock_key);
+
+void native_pv_lock_init(void) __init;
+
#define virt_spin_lock virt_spin_lock
static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
{
- if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
+ if (!static_branch_likely(&virt_spin_lock_key))
return false;
/*
@@ -65,6 +70,10 @@ static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
return true;
}
+#else
+static inline void native_pv_lock_init(void)
+{
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT */
#include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
index 8f2d1c9d43a8..2fc65ddea40d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
@@ -42,3 +42,9 @@ struct pv_lock_ops pv_lock_ops = {
#endif /* SMP */
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pv_lock_ops);
+
+void __init native_pv_lock_init(void)
+{
+ if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
+ static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 54b9e89d4d6b..21500d3ba359 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@
#include <asm/i8259.h>
#include <asm/realmode.h>
#include <asm/misc.h>
+#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
/* Number of siblings per CPU package */
int smp_num_siblings = 1;
@@ -1381,6 +1382,7 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
/* already set me in cpu_online_mask in boot_cpu_init() */
cpumask_set_cpu(me, cpu_callout_mask);
cpu_set_state_online(me);
+ native_pv_lock_init();
}
void __init native_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
index 294294c71ba4..838d235b87ef 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -76,6 +76,10 @@
#define MAX_NODES 4
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(virt_spin_lock_key);
+#endif
+
/*
* Per-CPU queue node structures; we can never have more than 4 nested
* contexts: task, softirq, hardirq, nmi.
--
2.12.3
Juergen Gross
2017-Sep-06 17:36 UTC
[PATCH v3 2/2] paravirt,xen: correct xen_nopvspin case
With the boot parameter "xen_nopvspin" specified a Xen guest should
not
make use of paravirt spinlocks, but behave as if running on bare
metal. This is not true, however, as the qspinlock code will fall back
to a test-and-set scheme when it is detecting a hypervisor.
In order to avoid this disable the virt_spin_lock_key.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com>
---
arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
index 25a7c4302ce7..e8ab80ad7a6f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <asm/paravirt.h>
+#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
#include <xen/interface/xen.h>
#include <xen/events.h>
@@ -129,6 +130,7 @@ void __init xen_init_spinlocks(void)
if (!xen_pvspin) {
printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: PV spinlocks disabled\n");
+ static_branch_disable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
return;
}
printk(KERN_DEBUG "xen: PV spinlocks enabled\n");
--
2.12.3
Juergen Gross
2017-Sep-25 13:59 UTC
[PATCH v3 0/2] guard virt_spin_lock() with a static key
Ping? On 06/09/17 19:36, Juergen Gross wrote:> With virt_spin_lock() being guarded by a static key the bare metal case > can be optimized by patching the call away completely. In case a kernel > running as a guest it can decide whether to use paravitualized > spinlocks, the current fallback to the unfair test-and-set scheme, or > to mimic the bare metal behavior. > > V3: > - remove test for hypervisor environment from virt_spin_lock(9 as > suggested by Waiman Long > > V2: > - use static key instead of making virt_spin_lock() a pvops function > > Juergen Gross (2): > paravirt/locks: use new static key for controlling call of > virt_spin_lock() > paravirt,xen: correct xen_nopvspin case > > arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 11 ++++++++++- > arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c | 6 ++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 ++ > arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 2 ++ > kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 4 ++++ > 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >
On 09/25/2017 09:59 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:> Ping? > > On 06/09/17 19:36, Juergen Gross wrote: >> With virt_spin_lock() being guarded by a static key the bare metal case >> can be optimized by patching the call away completely. In case a kernel >> running as a guest it can decide whether to use paravitualized >> spinlocks, the current fallback to the unfair test-and-set scheme, or >> to mimic the bare metal behavior. >> >> V3: >> - remove test for hypervisor environment from virt_spin_lock(9 as >> suggested by Waiman Long >> >> V2: >> - use static key instead of making virt_spin_lock() a pvops function >> >> Juergen Gross (2): >> paravirt/locks: use new static key for controlling call of >> virt_spin_lock() >> paravirt,xen: correct xen_nopvspin case >> >> arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 11 ++++++++++- >> arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c | 6 ++++++ >> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 ++ >> arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 2 ++ >> kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 4 ++++ >> 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman at redhat.com>
Peter Zijlstra
2017-Oct-02 14:19 UTC
[PATCH v3 0/2] guard virt_spin_lock() with a static key
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 07:36:23PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:> With virt_spin_lock() being guarded by a static key the bare metal case > can be optimized by patching the call away completely. In case a kernel > running as a guest it can decide whether to use paravitualized > spinlocks, the current fallback to the unfair test-and-set scheme, or > to mimic the bare metal behavior. > > V3: > - remove test for hypervisor environment from virt_spin_lock(9 as > suggested by Waiman Long > > V2: > - use static key instead of making virt_spin_lock() a pvops function > > Juergen Gross (2): > paravirt/locks: use new static key for controlling call of > virt_spin_lock() > paravirt,xen: correct xen_nopvspin case > > arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 11 ++++++++++- > arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c | 6 ++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 ++ > arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 2 ++ > kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 4 ++++ > 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)Sorry for the delay, picked it up now.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [PATCH v3 0/2] guard virt_spin_lock() with a static key
- [PATCH v2 0/2] guard virt_spin_lock() with a static key
- [PATCH v2 0/2] guard virt_spin_lock() with a static key
- [PATCH 0/4] make virt_spin_lock() a pvops function
- [PATCH 0/4] make virt_spin_lock() a pvops function