Virtualization - Jan 2011 - [PATCH 1/1] staging: hv: Removed unneeded call to netif_stop_queue() in hv_netvsc

From: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com>

Removed the call to netif_stop_queue() in netvsc_probe() as
the queue is not initialized at that point and further call
to it after queue initialization is really not necessary.

This change was prompted after an upstream change went into 
2.6.37 (netif_tx_stop_queue) that now checks if netif_stop_queue
is called before register with netdev is done.

This will eliminate the warning message to the log when hv_netvsc
driver starts up.

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane <v-abkane at microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com>


---
 drivers/staging/hv/netvsc_drv.c |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/netvsc_drv.c b/drivers/staging/hv/netvsc_drv.c
index 0147b40..54706a1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/hv/netvsc_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/hv/netvsc_drv.c
@@ -358,7 +358,6 @@ static int netvsc_probe(struct device *device)
 
 	/* Set initial state */
 	netif_carrier_off(net);
-	netif_stop_queue(net);
 
 	net_device_ctx = netdev_priv(net);
 	net_device_ctx->device_ctx = device_ctx;
-- 
1.6.0.2

On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 09:25:39AM -0800, Hank Janssen
wrote:
> From: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com>
> 
> Removed the call to netif_stop_queue() in netvsc_probe() as
> the queue is not initialized at that point and further call
> to it after queue initialization is really not necessary.
> 
> This change was prompted after an upstream change went into 
> 2.6.37 (netif_tx_stop_queue) that now checks if netif_stop_queue
> is called before register with netdev is done.
> 
> This will eliminate the warning message to the log when hv_netvsc
> driver starts up.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane <v-abkane at microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com>
What kernel is this needed for, .37?  .38?  older than .37?

thanks,

greg k-h

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh at suse.de]
> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 9:32 AM
> 
> What kernel is this needed for, .37?  .38?  older than .37?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
This is needed for kernels 2.6.37 and newer.

Btw, I have not seen KVP patches that where submitted in linux next yet.
I have not seen any other requests for changes to them, is there anything else
needed for acceptance?

Thanks,

Hank.