Virtualization - Jul 2009 - [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak on device removal

Free up msi vector tables.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
 drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
index 193c8f0..dab3c86 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
@@ -489,12 +489,15 @@ static void vp_del_vq(struct virtqueue *vq)
 /* the config->del_vqs() implementation */
 static void vp_del_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 {
+	struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
 	struct virtqueue *vq, *n;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(vq, n, &vdev->vqs, list)
 		vp_del_vq(vq);
 
 	vp_free_vectors(vdev);
+	kfree(vp_dev->msix_names);
+	kfree(vp_dev->msix_entries);
 }
 
 /* the config->find_vqs() implementation */
-- 
1.6.2.5

Free up msi vector tables.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---

Resending with corrected To list. Sorry about the churn.

 drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
index 193c8f0..dab3c86 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
@@ -489,12 +489,15 @@ static void vp_del_vq(struct virtqueue *vq)
 /* the config->del_vqs() implementation */
 static void vp_del_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 {
+	struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
 	struct virtqueue *vq, *n;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(vq, n, &vdev->vqs, list)
 		vp_del_vq(vq);
 
 	vp_free_vectors(vdev);
+	kfree(vp_dev->msix_names);
+	kfree(vp_dev->msix_entries);
 }
 
 /* the config->find_vqs() implementation */
-- 
1.6.2.5

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:29:09 am Michael S. Tsirkin
wrote:
> Free up msi vector tables.
Michael, this papers over the bug, but doesn't actually fix the problem.

The problem is that vp_free_vectors() does not do the reverse of 
vp_request_vectors.  If the author (you) can't get it right, what hope the 
rest of us?

Indeed, if you look harder, you'll see another leak caused by this problem, 
which your patch *didn't* fix.

Thanks,
Rusty.