thr3ads.net - tinc - Routing in tinc pre5 [Feb 2002]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Igor Belokopytov

2002-Feb-26 18:11 UTC

Routing in tinc pre5

Hello,

 I have HostA, HostB, HostC.
 HostB "ConnetTo=HostA" and HostC "ConnectTo=HostA"

[HostA]#cat tinc.conf
     Name = HostA
     Device = /dev/tap0
     PrivateKeyFile = /usr/local/etc/tinc/test4/rsa_key.priv

[HostB]#cat tinc.conf
     Name = HostB
     ConnectTo = HostA
     Device = /dev/misc/net/tun
     PrivateKeyFile = /usr/local/etc/tinc/test4/rsa_key.priv

[HostC]#cat tinc.conf
     Name = HostC
     ConnectTo = HostA
     Device = /dev/tap0
     PrivateKeyFile = /usr/local/etc/tinc/test4/rsa_key.priv

 hosts/HostA:
    Subnet = 192.168.2.0/24
    Port = 8195
    Address = 10.38.9.223
 hosts/HostB:
     Subnet = 192.168.1.0/24
     Port = 8195
     Address = 10.38.9.2
  hosts/HostC:
     Subnet = 192.168.3.0/24
     Port = 8195
     Address = 10.38.9.221

  [HostA]#cat tinc-up
     insmod ethertap -o "ethertap0" unit="0"
     ifconfig tap0 hw ether fe:fd:00:00:00:00
     ifconfig tap0 192.168.2.223 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast
192.168.255.255
     ifconfig tap0 -arp
     tincd -n test4 -d5

  [HostB]#cat tinc-up
    tincd -n test4 -d5
    ifconfig test4 hw ether fe:fd:00:00:00:00
    ifconfig test4 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast
192.168.255.255
    ifconfig test4 -arp

  [HostC]#cat tinc-up
     insmod ethertap -o "ethertap0" unit="0"
     ifconfig tap0 hw ether fe:fd:00:00:00:00
     ifconfig tap0 192.168.3.221 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast
192.168.255.255
     ifconfig tap0 -arp
     tincd -n test4 -d5

 pinging HostA <->HostB and  HostA <-> HostC are Ok.
 But if I try to ping HostC -> HostB I get:

    HostC tinc[11309]: Sending packet of 98 bytes to igor (10.38.9.2)
    HostC tinc[11309]: No valid key known yet for igor (10.38.9.2),
queueing packet
    HostA tinc.test4[12354]: Got SEGV signal
    HostA tinc.test4[12354]: Trying to re-execute in 5 seconds...
    HostA tinc.test4[12354]: Closing connection with HostB (10.38.9.2)
    HostA tinc.test4[12354]: Closing connection with HostC (10.38.9.221)

    HostC tinc[11309]: Connection closed by  HostA (10.38.9.223)
    HostC tinc[11309]: Closing connection with HostA (10.38.9.223)
    HostC tinc[11309]: Trying to re-establish outgoing connection in 5
seconds
    HostA tinc.test4[12354]: Closing connection with HostA (MYSELF)
    HostA tinc.test4[12354]: Executing script tinc-down
    HostC tinc[11309]: Cannot route packet: unknown destination address
192.168.1.2
    HostC tinc[11309]: Cannot route packet: unknown destination address
192.168.1.2


 Regards,
 Igor Belokopytov

Tinc:         Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Tinc site:    http://tinc.nl.linux.org/

Guus Sliepen

2002-Feb-26 19:06 UTC

head link

Routing in tinc pre5

On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:11:03AM -0700, Igor Belokopytov wrote:
>  pinging HostA <->HostB and  HostA <-> HostC are Ok.
>  But if I try to ping HostC -> HostB I get:
> 
>     HostC tinc[11309]: Sending packet of 98 bytes to igor (10.38.9.2)
>     HostC tinc[11309]: No valid key known yet for igor (10.38.9.2),
> queueing packet
>     HostA tinc.test4[12354]: Got SEGV signal
>     HostA tinc.test4[12354]: Trying to re-execute in 5 seconds...
Could you run the tinc on HostA with debug level 5 as well, and send the
log output directly prior to and including the SEGV?

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
  Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://brouwer.uvt.nl/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20020226/b3867f78/attachment.pgp

Igor Belokopytov

2002-Feb-26 19:59 UTC

head link

Routing in tinc pre5

HostC redirects log messages to HostA

[HostA]#tail -f /var/log/messages | grep tinc

( after [HostA]#./tinc-up)
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: tincd 1.0pre5 (Feb 21 2002 04:23:28) starting,
debug level 5
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: /dev/tap0 is a Linux ethertap device
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: Executing script tinc-up
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: Ready: listening on port 8195

( after [HostB]#./tinc-up)
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: Connection from 10.38.9.2 port 35621
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: Connection with HostB (10.38.9.2) activated

( after [HostC]#./tinc-up)
  HostC tinc[11333]: tincd 1.0pre5 (Feb 21 2002 04:23:28) starting, debug
level 5
  HostC tinc[11333]: /dev/tap0 is a Linux ethertap device
  HostC tinc[11333]: Executing script tinc-up
  HostC tinc[11333]: Ready: listening on port 8195
  HostC tinc[11333]: Trying to connect to HostA (10.38.9.223)
  HostC tinc[11333]: Connected to 10.38.9.223 port 8195
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: Connection from 10.38.9.221 port 4167
  HostC tinc[11333]: Connection with HostA (10.38.9.223) activated
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: Connection with HostC (10.38.9.221) activated

 ( after [HostC#ping HostB)
  HostC tinc[11333]: Sending packet of 98 bytes to HostB (10.38.9.2)
  HostC tinc[11333]: No valid key known yet for HostB (10.38.9.2), queueing
packet
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: Got SEGV signal
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: Trying to re-execute in 5 seconds...
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: Closing connection with HostB (10.38.9.2)
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: Closing connection with HostC (10.38.9.221)
  HostC tinc[11333]: Connection closed by HostA (10.38.9.223)
  HostC tinc[11333]: Closing connection with HostA (10.38.9.223)
  HostC tinc[11333]: Trying to re-establish outgoing connection in 5 seconds
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: Closing connection with HostA (MYSELF)
  HostA tinc.test4[12574]: Executing script tinc-down
  HostC tinc[11333]: Cannot route packet: unknown destination address
192.168.1.2
  HostA tinc.test4[12579]: tincd 1.0pre5 (Feb 21 2002 04:23:28) starting,
debug level 5
  HostA tinc.test4[12579]: /dev/tap0 is a Linux ethertap device
  HostA tinc.test4[12579]: Executing script tinc-up
  HostA tinc.test4[12579]: Ready: listening on port 8195

     Regareds,
     Igor Belokopytov

> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:11:03AM -0700, Igor Belokopytov wrote:
>
> >  pinging HostA <->HostB and  HostA <-> HostC are Ok.
> >  But if I try to ping HostC -> HostB I get:
> >
> >     HostC tinc[11309]: Sending packet of 98 bytes to igor (10.38.9.2)
> >     HostC tinc[11309]: No valid key known yet for igor (10.38.9.2),
> > queueing packet
> >     HostA tinc.test4[12354]: Got SEGV signal
> >     HostA tinc.test4[12354]: Trying to re-execute in 5 seconds...
>
> Could you run the tinc on HostA with debug level 5 as well, and send the
> log output directly prior to and including the SEGV?
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
>   Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net>
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
Tinc:         Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Tinc site:    http://tinc.nl.linux.org/

Guus Sliepen

2002-Feb-26 21:02 UTC

head link

Routing in tinc pre5

On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:59:34AM -0700, Igor Belokopytov wrote:
> HostC redirects log messages to HostA
Are you sure your syslogs log ALL messages to /var/log/messages?
You should check syslog.conf and make sure there is a line like:

*.*	/var/log/messages

If not, add one (you can use another filename like /var/log/all if you
wish). Most distributions ship a syslog.conf which distributes messages
according to severity across several files.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
  Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://brouwer.uvt.nl/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20020226/91ad35b9/attachment.pgp

Igor Belokopytov

2002-Feb-26 21:56 UTC

head link

Routing in tinc pre5

After  ping starting:

HostC tinc[11373]: Read packet of 98 bytes from Linux ethertap device
HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got REQ_KEY from HostC (10.38.9.221): 15 HostC HostB

HostC tinc[11373]: Sending packet of 98 bytes to HostB (10.38.9.2)
HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending REQ_KEY to HostB (10.38.9.2): 15 HostC HostB

HostC tinc[11373]: No valid key known yet for HostB (10.38.9.2), queueing
packet
HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 17 bytes of metadata to HostB (10.38.9.2)
HostC tinc[11373]: Sending REQ_KEY to HostA (10.38.9.223): 15 HostC HostB
HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got ANS_KEY from HostB (10.38.9.2): 16 HostB HostC
DDA923D69EB942DB8EF5E1E57F7DCCBC0AC92AB309D1F728 91 64 4
HostC tinc[11373]: Sending 17 bytes of metadata to HostA (10.38.9.223)
HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got SEGV signal
HostC tinc[11373]: Connection closed by HostA (10.38.9.223)
HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Trying to re-execute in 5 seconds...
HostC tinc[11373]: Closing connection with HostA (10.38.9.223)
HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Closing connection with HostB (10.38.9.2)
HostC tinc[11373]: Node HostB (10.38.9.2) became unreachable
HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Node HostB (10.38.9.2) became unreachable
HostC tinc[11373]: Node HostA (10.38.9.223) became unreachable
HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Closing connection with HostC (10.38.9.221)
HostC tinc[11373]: Trying to re-establish outgoing connection in 5 seconds
HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Node HostC (10.38.9.221) became unreachable
HostC tinc[11373]: Purging unreachable nodes
HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Closing connection with HostA (MYSELF)
HostC tinc[11373]: Read packet of 98 bytes from Linux ethertap device
HostC tinc[11373]: Cannot route packet: unknown destination address
192.168.1.2
HostC tinc[11373]: Read packet of 98 bytes from Linux ethertap device
HostC tinc[11373]: Cannot route packet: unknown destination address
192.168.1.2
HostC tinc[11373]: Read packet of 98 bytes from Linux ethertap device
HostC tinc[11373]: Cannot route packet: unknown destination address
192.168.1.2
HostA tinc.test4[12708]: tincd 1.0pre5 (Feb 21 2002 04:23:28) starting, debug
level 5
HostA tinc.test4[12708]: /dev/tap0 is a Linux ethertap device
HostA tinc.test4[12708]: Executing script tinc-up
HostA tinc.test4[12708]: Node mdktest (MYSELF) became reachable
HostA tinc.test4[12708]: Ready: listening on port 8195

> On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:59:34AM -0700, Igor Belokopytov wrote:
>
> > HostC redirects log messages to HostA
>
> Are you sure your syslogs log ALL messages to /var/log/messages?
> You should check syslog.conf and make sure there is a line like:
>
> *.*     /var/log/messages
>
> If not, add one (you can use another filename like /var/log/all if you
> wish). Most distributions ship a syslog.conf which distributes messages
> according to severity across several files.
>
> --
Tinc:         Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Tinc site:    http://tinc.nl.linux.org/

Igor Belokopytov

2002-Feb-26 22:09 UTC

head link

Routing in tinc pre5

Full log:

Feb 26 06:33:39 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: tincd 1.0pre5 (Feb 21 2002 04:23:28)
starting, debug level 5
Feb 26 06:33:39 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: /dev/tap0 is a Linux ethertap device

Feb 26 06:33:39 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Executing script tinc-up
Feb 26 06:33:39 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Node HostA (MYSELF) became reachable

Feb 26 06:33:39 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Ready: listening on port 8195
Feb 26 06:34:22 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Connection from 10.38.9.2 port 37698

Feb 26 06:34:22 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending ID to (null) (10.38.9.2): 0
HostA 12
Feb 26 06:34:22 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 13 bytes of metadata to
(null) (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:22 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got ID from (null) (10.38.9.2): 0
HostB 12
Feb 26 06:34:22 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending METAKEY to HostB
(10.38.9.2): 1
8295C4233B43762910B8C4F8EEFB371F197B37450C13C68200B32796CDDF23AA7808CDFA8935B1A9FA0C73C95D54C2A487D6781E92DDFBFA04AF69B520624A1FE6A342E43A8254119D8FD85C4FCFA0164310FD88B15CED729E7B0001E5D9095FC44A95262406782C717B2A596B73CC114DE6A96120C47696B05CE70C06796981

Feb 26 06:34:22 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 259 bytes of metadata to
HostB (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:22 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got METAKEY from HostB (10.38.9.2):
1
39F1CC17F6732A4E0C2D606B82C930ABB5B2992E853562200199FC7EACE9EB2CA48CFC3FCA5F35D6E9E9F3BE950F6DD8C669C59AB2FDF8F15340AD1EFDA15C40463273589AB3A6AF333D8C59F8124FCCE7915FDE2F4937A6C703991BB5D796888BC11839EC0B36FACDFF56252AA9EF346F5714968AE3734CECD27C814B9E98FE

Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending CHALLENGE to HostB
(10.38.9.2): 2
3024F57CD5A7C70F3D26CB555652D79F07C9D1B10C787A43640FA907649385F9FA581E3B2FD93F579DCA0E9498314C9A88D5A27C69A5BE37C92929A651ABA15A503EBAB0919548496CD3C1B4C54B60765DFAABD49A56C06757E4A4327F66E18B3EAE3149A11DC40C6BD00AC2A1294058E485A8318657BCA83EB1FB156C3C801F

Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 259 bytes of metadata to
HostB (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got CHALLENGE from HostB
(10.38.9.2): 2
9E07B5C59305CB2A9E08BD844A49365F70806760E99212BC8AA0C239F6BC836CBBADB0B00A4F65CCB11F5987C7266CEC7DE43698B807335EB21E5EA2DEE59498546F3D22DBC0571C268350910877328EB2864FFC6D83C2EFB46D2880E48AF7DC3594E9FBBCF6626B74AB0DF1B1B4269B8517589E9095A0CF9516AF00554EF076

Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending CHAL_REPLY to HostB
(10.38.9.2): 3 9964B9326AE214F2BE05619C312F92D39004CFD2
Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 43 bytes of metadata to
HostB (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got CHAL_REPLY from HostB
(10.38.9.2): 3 A62C7A35EF10ECAB565BC48654E91BD3EA7A263A
Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending ACK to HostB (10.38.9.2): 4
8195 10.38.9.2 182 0
Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 23 bytes of metadata to
HostB (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got ACK from HostB (10.38.9.2): 4
8195 10.38.9.223 176 0
Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Connection with HostB (10.38.9.2)
activated
Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending ADD_SUBNET to HostB
(10.38.9.2): 10 HostA 192.168.2.0/24
Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 26 bytes of metadata to
HostB (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Node HostB (10.38.9.2) became
reachable
Feb 26 06:34:23 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got ADD_SUBNET from HostB
(10.38.9.2): 10 HostB 192.168.1.0/24
Feb 26 06:34:24 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Connection closed by HostB
(10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:24 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Closing connection with HostB
(10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:24 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Node HostB (10.38.9.2) became
unreachable
Feb 26 06:34:24 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Purging unreachable nodes
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Connection from 10.38.9.2 port 37699

Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending ID to (null) (10.38.9.2): 0
HostA 12
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 13 bytes of metadata to
(null) (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got ID from (null) (10.38.9.2): 0
HostB 12
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending METAKEY to HostB
(10.38.9.2): 1
85D042F1BF57BD82F40C5B2FCCDF19A447DA87D1717441FF953E7426386F2B4C2876C31E79A4877D88DE1272CFDDEB378127551B9139850A4D4017F6DC72C6F354ADA7BD4FCD236EE73D1150A8D436336EBE5FF9F6EB9F12B58083CE2EB9AAE88C824532109DBAD29073EA59B0652519110E8A1901AC80397661E3A1611BF8F1

Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 259 bytes of metadata to
HostB (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got METAKEY from HostB (10.38.9.2):
1
206431BD724F8C81ED241E3FB18B1F5A534F335FA38BF50C933CCE207319465BB15030A997FFCE36C1E9FEC085B1A1B43F884A1436511DDEA926948D9AA981A7185CC1E1B43F998D6B1C655F6A62A654677F5F3CD02D81FDC9B7F5C566CC5E0724A330580262D7BE345FAE247F231B91836B009E1B3F60075C5A616519CD5446

Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending CHALLENGE to HostB
(10.38.9.2): 2
D0CBDC1B66D29D3B9E52F4DA1C3D2D159DAE22D3CAA6E83197695D189B8DE2FA8BAAE977A0E1A8FA319D0DE66B20FCA5A78596C10085596DCF1E269F873882BB7E86FD7D872ECB67AD61F96CAE009C4CDA401F2E328D0D6E20C302130956FFCE42E616843A2C459F452A3B605233360E4CC0085827AD5334449A13F1119C0804

Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 259 bytes of metadata to
HostB (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got CHALLENGE from HostB
(10.38.9.2): 2
EE22D82644108884AF6351DC7FCC7BB724BA568AE7214B1CD432A6F6E75CEB82CE3B204F981BB6444FBD38F498E13B00F98908E2F57C1071DBEC613FC303ADB33C51EBEE6CB07574D31DE9AAAAED1A44A17B5C5E027AFA384E38B88DC60BCB1D6FFBA730E5F28E046306CEFC3EDEF0DD6E3BE399DC935882865E49D3DCFA57E6

Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending CHAL_REPLY to HostB
(10.38.9.2): 3 78B0542D3630772C6EA76BD6CC11F9C1FD30CFEE
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 43 bytes of metadata to
HostB (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got CHAL_REPLY from HostB
(10.38.9.2): 3 3397F264D3557424CC601B135C4169D0760C17DF
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending ACK to HostB (10.38.9.2): 4
8195 10.38.9.2 196 0
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 23 bytes of metadata to
HostB (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got ACK from HostB (10.38.9.2): 4
8195 10.38.9.223 190 0
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Connection with HostB (10.38.9.2)
activated
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending ADD_SUBNET to HostB
(10.38.9.2): 10 HostA 192.168.2.0/24
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 26 bytes of metadata to
HostB (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Node HostB (10.38.9.2) became
reachable
Feb 26 06:34:25 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got ADD_SUBNET from HostB
(10.38.9.2): 10 HostB 192.168.1.0/24
Feb 26 06:35:29 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got PING from HostB (10.38.9.2): 8
Feb 26 06:35:29 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending PONG to HostB (10.38.9.2): 9

Feb 26 06:35:29 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 2 bytes of metadata to HostB
(10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: tincd 1.0pre5 (Feb 21 2002 04:23:28)
starting, debug level 5
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: /dev/tap0 is a Linux ethertap device
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Executing script tinc-up
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Node HostC (MYSELF) became reachable
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Connection from 10.38.9.221 port
4171
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Ready: listening on port 8195
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending ID to (null) (10.38.9.221):
0 HostA 12
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Trying to connect to HostA (10.38.9.223)
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 13 bytes of metadata to
(null) (10.38.9.221)
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Connected to 10.38.9.223 port 8195
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got ID from (null) (10.38.9.221): 0
HostC 12
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending ID to HostA (10.38.9.223): 0 HostC
12
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending 14 bytes of metadata to HostA
(10.38.9.223)
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending METAKEY to HostC
(10.38.9.221): 1
ABCFD9D776E20279625EC1731E25D4DA5E03A24A66B4FFFE7BDA4DBC9F3FCDD099A43FFD44F791755846FA50ED8DD604002E47E5E35A73753D064A587FA2A918037430FE082DC57743DE130837986AEBFD1E1511A547F5C5453326CAB1478A92525BA6B4ACB713FC22EA6F758DA41AF1496BF6DE9DF06EEF795383016CEEDEAC

Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Got ID from HostA (10.38.9.223): 0 HostA
12
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 259 bytes of metadata to
HostC (10.38.9.221)
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending METAKEY to HostA (10.38.9.223): 1
6827E8FEEE79DCFEE528BC876365CADA7B0D60134775C1FAFEC1354F85A043C1420AB0C39F5F8B834EB1493854CE7B692B01546BAAC8D31D4C3184441FF088641DD201CCD974AE84F35E09BB6E5FD8F35CDBB4A31692A8FB6A803B060ECBFE2B61AE7C6148ED8F21845FBA0F260AC0889680CE077564D3A3ED36EB3317CF9F4C

Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got METAKEY from HostC
(10.38.9.221): 1
6827E8FEEE79DCFEE528BC876365CADA7B0D60134775C1FAFEC1354F85A043C1420AB0C39F5F8B834EB1493854CE7B692B01546BAAC8D31D4C3184441FF088641DD201CCD974AE84F35E09BB6E5FD8F35CDBB4A31692A8FB6A803B060ECBFE2B61AE7C6148ED8F21845FBA0F260AC0889680CE077564D3A3ED36EB3317CF9F4C

Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending 259 bytes of metadata to HostA
(10.38.9.223)
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending CHALLENGE to HostC
(10.38.9.221): 2
A16FD06F39A55F495C1BF9EA56DEB91056CF67075E58D653ACBC344679EAF1305B3C2FB85C991BB5DABEA4C2C6EF3AB859206FEC0D1AFE50202B01CF877CE340A600E1D4561353E4C49974DB0C65E78C237F98175C778356009E4CACFAE7C6777CC2BDCE3C5FB10DF6965168E103184E6569029D8B665B505A9983DCA2A68B81

Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Got METAKEY from HostA (10.38.9.223): 1
ABCFD9D776E20279625EC1731E25D4DA5E03A24A66B4FFFE7BDA4DBC9F3FCDD099A43FFD44F791755846FA50ED8DD604002E47E5E35A73753D064A587FA2A918037430FE082DC57743DE130837986AEBFD1E1511A547F5C5453326CAB1478A92525BA6B4ACB713FC22EA6F758DA41AF1496BF6DE9DF06EEF795383016CEEDEAC

Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 259 bytes of metadata to
HostC (10.38.9.221)
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending CHALLENGE to HostA (10.38.9.223):
2
DCE66D6CF4A99BD40055D8E6FB3F6874DACAE100686CA6B8A31B9EA8F419CC968CAF549E462D44A14C95F84D510BD05E45E68BED9BA554AC2AAD9D6EFF84AFB8C0B7DC621D09B2C8F4E14A91C10A2B48AE7A905529B2CE44B187C9EC80CE354C6AE0D6BD50A8BB96CC140832748E9814E97A83124689769D210E0680B0E4A64F

Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got CHALLENGE from HostC
(10.38.9.221): 2
DCE66D6CF4A99BD40055D8E6FB3F6874DACAE100686CA6B8A31B9EA8F419CC968CAF549E462D44A14C95F84D510BD05E45E68BED9BA554AC2AAD9D6EFF84AFB8C0B7DC621D09B2C8F4E14A91C10A2B48AE7A905529B2CE44B187C9EC80CE354C6AE0D6BD50A8BB96CC140832748E9814E97A83124689769D210E0680B0E4A64F

Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending 259 bytes of metadata to HostA
(10.38.9.223)
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending CHAL_REPLY to HostC
(10.38.9.221): 3 5DCCE98B5E32A1647471D4C5C892C620E281EF96
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Got CHALLENGE from HostA (10.38.9.223): 2
A16FD06F39A55F495C1BF9EA56DEB91056CF67075E58D653ACBC344679EAF1305B3C2FB85C991BB5DABEA4C2C6EF3AB859206FEC0D1AFE50202B01CF877CE340A600E1D4561353E4C49974DB0C65E78C237F98175C778356009E4CACFAE7C6777CC2BDCE3C5FB10DF6965168E103184E6569029D8B665B505A9983DCA2A68B81

Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 43 bytes of metadata to
HostC (10.38.9.221)
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending CHAL_REPLY to HostA (10.38.9.223):
3 34529AC413514C16DDB9DDA4C053FE0DA281ECBB
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got CHAL_REPLY from HostC
(10.38.9.221): 3 34529AC413514C16DDB9DDA4C053FE0DA281ECBB
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending 43 bytes of metadata to HostA
(10.38.9.223)
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending ACK to HostC (10.38.9.221):
4 8195 10.38.9.221 195 0
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Got CHAL_REPLY from HostA (10.38.9.223): 3
5DCCE98B5E32A1647471D4C5C892C620E281EF96
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 25 bytes of metadata to
HostC (10.38.9.221)
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending ACK to HostA (10.38.9.223): 4 8195
10.38.9.223 205 0
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got ACK from HostC (10.38.9.221): 4
8195 10.38.9.223 205 0
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending 25 bytes of metadata to HostA
(10.38.9.223)
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Connection with HostC (10.38.9.221)
activated
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostC tinc[11373]: Got ACK from HostA (10.38.9.223): 4 8195
10.38.9.221 195 0
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending ADD_SUBNET to HostC
(10.38.9.221): 10 HostB 192.168.1.0/24
Feb 26 06:35:52 HostC tinc[11373]: Connection with HostA (10.38.9.223)
activated
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 23 bytes of metadata to
HostC (10.38.9.221)
Feb 26 06:35:52 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending ADD_SUBNET to HostA (10.38.9.223):
10 HostC 192.168.3.0/24
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending ADD_SUBNET to HostC
(10.38.9.221): 10 HostA 192.168.2.0/24
Feb 26 06:35:52 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending 27 bytes of metadata to HostA
(10.38.9.223)
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 26 bytes of metadata to
HostC (10.38.9.221)
Feb 26 06:35:52 HostC tinc[11373]: Node HostA (10.38.9.223) became reachable
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending ADD_EDGE to HostC
(10.38.9.221): 12 HostA 10.38.9.223 8195 HostB 10.38.9.2 8195 0 193
Feb 26 06:35:52 HostC tinc[11373]: Got ADD_SUBNET from HostA (10.38.9.223):
10 HostB 192.168.1.0/24
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 54 bytes of metadata to
HostC (10.38.9.221)
Feb 26 06:35:52 HostC tinc[11373]: Got ADD_SUBNET from HostA (10.38.9.223):
10 HostA 192.168.2.0/24
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending ADD_EDGE to HostB
(10.38.9.2): 12 HostA 10.38.9.223 8195 HostC 10.38.9.221 8195 0 200
Feb 26 06:35:52 HostC tinc[11373]: Got ADD_EDGE from HostA (10.38.9.223): 12
HostA 10.38.9.223 8195 HostB 10.38.9.2 8195 0 193
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 60 bytes of metadata to
HostB (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:35:52 HostC tinc[11373]: Node HostB (10.38.9.2) became reachable
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Node HostC (10.38.9.221) became
reachable
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got ADD_SUBNET from HostC
(10.38.9.221): 10 HostC 192.168.3.0/24
Feb 26 06:35:51 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending ADD_SUBNET to HostB
(10.38.9.2): 10 HostC 192.168.3.0/24 Feb
26 06:35:52 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 27 bytes of metadata to HostB
(10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostC tinc[11373]: Read packet of 98 bytes from Linux
ethertap device
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got REQ_KEY from HostC
(10.38.9.221): 15 HostC HostB
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending packet of 98 bytes to HostB
(10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending REQ_KEY to HostB
(10.38.9.2): 15 HostC HostB
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostC tinc[11373]: No valid key known yet for HostB
(10.38.9.2), queueing packet
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Sending 17 bytes of metadata to
HostB (10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:36:11 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending REQ_KEY to HostA (10.38.9.223): 15
HostC HostB
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got ANS_KEY from HostB (10.38.9.2):
16 HostB HostC DDA923D69EB942DB8EF5E1E57F7DCCBC0AC92AB309D1F728 91 64 4
Feb 26 06:36:11 HostC tinc[11373]: Sending 17 bytes of metadata to HostA
(10.38.9.223)
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Got SEGV signal
Feb 26 06:36:11 HostC tinc[11373]: Connection closed by HostA (10.38.9.223)
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Trying to re-execute in 5 seconds...

Feb 26 06:36:11 HostC tinc[11373]: Closing connection with HostA
(10.38.9.223)
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Closing connection with HostB
(10.38.9.2)
Feb 26 06:36:11 HostC tinc[11373]: Node HostB (10.38.9.2) became unreachable
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Node HostB (10.38.9.2) became
unreachable
Feb 26 06:36:11 HostC tinc[11373]: Node HostA (10.38.9.223) became
unreachable
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Closing connection with HostC
(10.38.9.221)
Feb 26 06:36:11 HostC tinc[11373]: Trying to re-establish outgoing connection
in 5 seconds
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Node HostC (10.38.9.221) became
unreachable
Feb 26 06:36:11 HostC tinc[11373]: Purging unreachable nodes
Feb 26 06:36:10 HostA tinc.test4[12705]: Closing connection with tC
tinc[11373]: Read packet of 98 bytes from
Linux ethertap device
Feb 26 06:36:11 HostC tinc[11373]: Cannot route packet: unknown destination
address 192.168.1.2
Feb 26 06:36:12 HostC tinc[11373]: Read packet of 98 bytes from Linux
ethertap device
Feb 26 06:36:12 HostC tinc[11373]: Cannot route packet: unknown destination
address 192.168.1.2
Feb 26 06:36:13 HostC tinc[11373]: Read packet of 98 bytes from Linux
ethertap device
Feb 26 06:36:13 HostC tinc[11373]: Cannot route packet: unknown destination
address 192.168.1.2
Feb 26 06:36:16 HostA tinc.test4[12708]: tincd 1.0pre5 (Feb 21 2002 04:23:28)
starting, debug level 5
Feb 26 06:36:16 HostA tinc.test4[12708]: /dev/tap0 is a Linux ethertap device

Feb 26 06:36:16 HostA tinc.test4[12708]: Executing script tinc-up
Feb 26 06:36:16 HostA tinc.test4[12708]: Node HostA (MYSELF) became reachable

Feb 26 06:36:16 HostA tinc.test4[12708]: Ready: listening on port 8195

Tinc:         Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Tinc site:    http://tinc.nl.linux.org/

tinc - Feb 2002 - Routing in tinc pre5

Routing in tinc pre5

Routing in tinc pre5

Routing in tinc pre5

Routing in tinc pre5

Routing in tinc pre5

Routing in tinc pre5