Yes, I think so. The integer really means the same as EFI's ExitBootServices. Matt Fleming <matt at console-pimps.org> wrote:>On Fri, 02 Aug, at 07:50:57AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> I don't know if there is a meaningful difference between "localboot >-1" >> and "localboot 0" on EFI... they are really two different ways to ask >> the BIOS to do the same thing. > >That's fine, it was just that I couldn't figure out what LOCALBOOT 0 >should do on EFI. Should we just ignore the integer argument to >LOCALBOOT for EFI when booting over PXE? The argument doesn't really >make sense at all on EFI.-- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
So will the patch be applied in 6.02? Am 02.08.2013 17:30 schrieb "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com>:> Yes, I think so. The integer really means the same as EFI's > ExitBootServices. > > Matt Fleming <matt at console-pimps.org> wrote: > >On Fri, 02 Aug, at 07:50:57AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> I don't know if there is a meaningful difference between "localboot > >-1" > >> and "localboot 0" on EFI... they are really two different ways to ask > >> the BIOS to do the same thing. > > > >That's fine, it was just that I couldn't figure out what LOCALBOOT 0 > >should do on EFI. Should we just ignore the integer argument to > >LOCALBOOT for EFI when booting over PXE? The argument doesn't really > >make sense at all on EFI. > > -- > Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting. >