Hello Peter,
the following changes since commit 94fbd0b8d206102757cecd3dbd67cd701fb70470:
Merge remote branch 'liu/master' (2010-10-15 16:41:02 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://repo.or.cz/syslinux/sherbszt.git gfxboot32
Colin Watson (1):
gfxboot: fix buffer overrun when loading kernel/initramfs
com32/gfxboot/gfxboot.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Sebastian
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:32:56PM +0200, Sebastian Herbszt wrote:> the following changes since commit 94fbd0b8d206102757cecd3dbd67cd701fb70470: > > Merge remote branch 'liu/master' (2010-10-15 16:41:02 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://repo.or.cz/syslinux/sherbszt.git gfxboot32 > > Colin Watson (1): > gfxboot: fix buffer overrun when loading kernel/initramfs > > com32/gfxboot/gfxboot.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)Thanks for sorting out the confusion around this while I was away. Do you have any thoughts on http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2010-July/014870.html? It's not clear that I'm going to have time for the refactoring that HPA suggested in the only follow-up to that patch; it wasn't clear to me whether that was going to be a blocker. I do think this is an improvement and it's just adding support for syntax already documented in doc/menu.txt ... Thanks, -- Colin Watson [cjwatson at ubuntu.com]
On 10/22/2010 08:46 AM, Colin Watson wrote:> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:32:56PM +0200, Sebastian Herbszt wrote: >> the following changes since commit 94fbd0b8d206102757cecd3dbd67cd701fb70470: >> >> Merge remote branch 'liu/master' (2010-10-15 16:41:02 -0700) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://repo.or.cz/syslinux/sherbszt.git gfxboot32 >> >> Colin Watson (1): >> gfxboot: fix buffer overrun when loading kernel/initramfs >> >> com32/gfxboot/gfxboot.c | 3 ++- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > Thanks for sorting out the confusion around this while I was away. Do > you have any thoughts on > http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2010-July/014870.html? It's not > clear that I'm going to have time for the refactoring that HPA suggested > in the only follow-up to that patch; it wasn't clear to me whether that > was going to be a blocker. > > I do think this is an improvement and it's just adding support for > syntax already documented in doc/menu.txt ... >Well, I want to put out Syslinux 4.03 *today*, and I'm not familiar enough with gfxboot to know if this patch is correct or likely to introduce problems... -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.