Hello, I use the extlinux bootloader, and I've recently discovered that the current version can no longer boot Windows. The message it flashes is "Requested partition not found!" After downgrading to the version 3.86, it was able boot correctly. Unfortunately, I do not know in which was the last version which was able to boot Windows (I rarely boot it), but I am pretty sure that 4.00-pre47 did. Here's the relevant section of the extlinux config: label windows menu label Windows XP kernel chain.c32 append hd0 3 Here's the output of "fdisk -l": Disk /dev/sda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders, total 234441648 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0xad2bad2b Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 63 80324 40131 83 Linux /dev/sda2 80325 160248374 80084025 5 Extended /dev/sda3 160248375 234436544 37094085 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda5 80326 158224184 79071929+ 83 Linux /dev/sda6 158224186 159236279 506047 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda7 159236281 160248374 506047 83 Linux If you need any additional information, I'd be glad to provide it. Alec
H. Peter Anvin
2010-Jul-29 23:25 UTC
[syslinux] EXTLINUX 4.02 can't boot Windows partition
On 07/29/2010 03:07 PM, Alec Moskvin wrote:> Hello, > > I use the extlinux bootloader, and I've recently discovered that the > current version can no longer boot Windows. The message it flashes is > "Requested partition not found!" > > After downgrading to the version 3.86, it was able boot correctly. > > Unfortunately, I do not know in which was the last version which was > able to boot Windows (I rarely boot it), but I am pretty sure that > 4.00-pre47 did. >Could you try 4.01, please? -hpa
On Thursday 29 July 2010 20:37:03, H. Peter Anvin wrote:> On 07/29/2010 05:43 PM, Alec Moskvin wrote: > >> > >> Could you try 4.01, please? > >> > >> -hpa > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > I re-installed syslinux 4.01 and the result is exactly the same as with > > 4.02. > > > > Hm... that's a problem. Any chance you could try out the prereleases > between 4.00-pre47 (which you said worked) and 4.01? > > Or better yet, if you have the ability, use "git bisect". > > -hpa > > -- > H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center > I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. >Hi Peter, I do not know how to do git bisect, but I was able to determine that the bug was introduced in 4.00-pre61. With pre60, it boots with no problem. Alec