Simon Hartl
2002-Feb-01 09:58 UTC
[syslinux] problem booting linux on intel scb2 ata board
hello again, i've reported a problem with the intel scb2 ata board and syslinux a few days ago. now i've more details: the scb2 ata board has an onboard promise raid controller. when the option bios of this ide raid controller is disabled syslinux works fine - but if the option bios is enabled (which has to be if i want to boot form the harddisk) the boot of the fails (kernel version: 2.2.19, initial ramdisk used) last message displayed is: "Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting kernel." (sometimes not even this message is show) if i use syslinux version 1.49 or lower the problems are different: with 512MB RAM: the kernel boots process works fine but it can't find the rootfs (the initrd) which results in kernel panic. with 1GB RAM all works fine is there any solution for this problem (i've also tried syslinux -s with the same result)? best regards simon hartl ------------- OSST GmbH Scharitzerstrasse 21a A-4020 Linz Austria Tel: +43-70-601440 Mobile: +43-699-16014404
H. Peter Anvin
2002-Feb-01 10:03 UTC
[syslinux] Re: problem booting linux on intel scb2 ata board
Simon Hartl wrote:> > i've reported a problem with the intel scb2 ata board and syslinux a few > days ago. > now i've more details: > > the scb2 ata board has an onboard promise raid controller. > when the option bios of this ide raid controller is disabled syslinux > works fine - but if the > option bios is enabled (which has to be if i want to boot form the > harddisk) the boot > of the fails (kernel version: 2.2.19, initial ramdisk used) > > last message displayed is: "Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting kernel." > (sometimes not even this > message is show) > > if i use syslinux version 1.49 or lower the problems are different: > with 512MB RAM: > the kernel boots process works fine but it can't find the rootfs (the > initrd) which results in > kernel panic. > with 1GB RAM all works fine > > is there any solution for this problem (i've also tried syslinux -s with > the same result)? >I have heard of problems before with this particular combination of hardware. Unfortunately I have no way to debug it without access to hardware. Could you try a 2.4.x kernel for me? It would let me know if it a problem that can be resolved with a new boot protocol version. -hpa