On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:58:45AM +0100, olafBuddenhagen at gmx.net wrote:> Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:48:16AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote: > > > In master, we need to do something to make this work correctly, and I > > think forcing everyone to clone swfdec is not a good idea. At least > > not the way it "works" now. > > Perhaps it would be best to host the (trimmed) swfdec testsuite in a > distinct repo, and include it as a Git submodule?I'd favor this one. Best if in coordination with swfdec developers (if anyone still exists) --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Sandro Santilli <strk at keybit.net> wrote:> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:58:45AM +0100, olafBuddenhagen at gmx.net wrote: >> Perhaps it would be best to host the (trimmed) swfdec testsuite in a >> distinct repo, and include it as a Git submodule? > > I'd favor this one. > Best if in coordination with swfdec developers (if anyone still exists) >I don't think Swfdec developers exist anymore. Also, if they would, they'd tell you that they hate git submodules. So I'd say you just copy the tests and keep them. You can still revisit the problem in the unlikely case that Swfdec developers do show up again. Benjamin