Israel Herraiz
2010-Jan-17 12:36 UTC
[sup-talk] Missing the save index option (patch attached)
Hi all,
since the last changes to get rid of the save option and to migrate to
the Xapian index, I am really missing the save index option.
Currently, when Sup exits, all the changes to the index are flushed,
and in my case it takes ages because I am a heavy email load user. For
me that is a problem, because my Sup is always open, and I usually
suspend my laptop. From time to time, my laptop won''t wake up, and I
am forced to do an unclean reboot. When I open again Sup, all the
changes I did (archiving threads, etc) are lost because the index was
not flushed.
I know that I can use the XAPIAN_FLUSH_THRESHOLD option, but if I use
that option, when the threshold is reached it interrupts me while I am
dealing with my email, and I have to wait some seconds until the index
is flushed. This behavior is very annoying.
I don''t know if someone else in this list is also missing the
possibility of flushing the index from Sup. I have done the attached
changes to my Sup, that recovers a sort-of the old save index
option. I am sending to the list just in case the patch is useful for
others too. If there are not strong objections to this change, I
suggest to merge it with Sup.
Cheers,
Israel
---
lib/sup/modes/thread-index-mode.rb | 7 +++++++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/sup/modes/thread-index-mode.rb
b/lib/sup/modes/thread-index-mode.rb
index a5bd344..3a1bb76 100644
--- a/lib/sup/modes/thread-index-mode.rb
+++ b/lib/sup/modes/thread-index-mode.rb
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ EOS
k.add :toggle_spam, "Mark/unmark thread as spam",
''S''
k.add :toggle_deleted, "Delete/undelete thread",
''d''
k.add :kill, "Kill thread (never to be seen in inbox again)",
''&''
+ k.add :flush_index, "Flush all changes now",
''$''
k.add :jump_to_next_new, "Jump to next new thread", :tab
k.add :reply, "Reply to latest message in a thread",
''r''
k.add :reply_all, "Reply to all participants of the latest message in
a thread", ''G''
@@ -449,6 +450,12 @@ EOS
multi_kill [t]
end
+ def flush_index
+ @flush_id = BufferManager.say "Flushing index..."
+ Index.save_index
+ BufferManager.clear @flush_id
+ end
+
## m-m-m-m-MULTI-KILL
def multi_kill threads
UndoManager.register "killing #{threads.size.pluralize
''thread''}" do
--
1.6.6
William Morgan
2010-Jan-17 15:25 UTC
[sup-talk] Missing the save index option (patch attached)
Reformatted excerpts from Israel Herraiz''s message of 2010-01-17:> I don''t know if someone else in this list is also missing the > possibility of flushing the index from Sup. I have done the attached > changes to my Sup, that recovers a sort-of the old save index option. > I am sending to the list just in case the patch is useful for others > too. If there are not strong objections to this change, I suggest to > merge it with Sup.I believe we''ve discussed this before and decided it would be a good idea. Any objections to adding this to the insta-save branch? (Also has the nice side-effect of making ''$'' not go to the bottom of the screen, which was driving me batty.) -- William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
Ben Walton
2010-Jan-17 16:12 UTC
[sup-talk] Missing the save index option (patch attached)
Excerpts from William Morgan''s message of Sun Jan 17 10:25:59 -0500 2010:> (Also has the nice side-effect of making ''$'' not go to the bottom of the > screen, which was driving me batty.)Yes, that has been hard for me to unlearn too. -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20100117/507a22ba/attachment.bin>
William Morgan
2010-Jan-17 23:22 UTC
[sup-talk] Missing the save index option (patch attached)
Reformatted excerpts from Israel Herraiz''s message of 2010-01-17:> I am sending to the list just in case the patch is useful for others > too. If there are not strong objections to this change, I suggest to > merge it with Sup.Applied to insta-save and remerged into next. Thanks! -- William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>