sup talk - Dec 2009 - AM/PM display

In inbox-mode, Sup seems to display all of my message as if they were
received in the PM hours. Is this a known defect, or just a
misconfiguration on my part?
-- 
Jay

"Me too".

I posted about similar issues a while ago, but I don''t think I got far.

"Jay Mendoza" <jayzer at gmail.com> wrote:
>In inbox-mode, Sup seems to display all of my message as if they were
>received in the PM hours. Is this a known defect, or just a
>misconfiguration on my part?
>-- 
>Jay
>_______________________________________________
>sup-talk mailing list
>sup-talk at rubyforge.org
>http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk
>
-- 
Mike Kelly

Jay Mendoza, 2009-12-18 22:26:
> In inbox-mode, Sup seems to display all of my message as if they
> were received in the PM hours. Is this a known defect, or just a
> misconfiguration on my part?
I remember seeing AM hours (and see them now).  I also don''t see how
it possibly could be caused by configuration.

...which reminds me of a couple of configurability hacks (configurable
"missing attachment detector" and configurable thread list date
formats) I cooked together quite a while ago and don''t remenber
sharing yet.  Shame on me.  So here they are, keep them if you like
them (if they aren''t already obsoleted by something I''m not
aware of)

-- 
Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0006-configurable-listing-date-formats-and-attachment-det.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20091219/ce94f2f9/attachment.obj>

Reformatted excerpts from Jay Mendoza''s message of
2009-12-18:
> In inbox-mode, Sup seems to display all of my message as if they were
> received in the PM hours. Is this a known defect, or just a
> misconfiguration on my part?
Weird. Are the times otherwise correct?
-- 
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>

Reformatted excerpts from Tero Tilus''s message of
2009-12-18:
> ...which reminds me of a couple of configurability hacks (configurable
> "missing attachment detector" and configurable thread list date
> formats) I cooked together quite a while ago and don''t remenber
> sharing yet.
Both of these are good ideas, but I would like to add them in hook form
rather than in configuration form, please.
-- 
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>

William Morgan, 2009-12-19 20:12:
> Both of these are good ideas, but I would like to add them in hook
> form rather than in configuration form, please.
The detect-missing-attachment hook is pretty self evident but what you
had in mind for the dates?  Formatter for the thread-index-mode date
widget maybe?

-- 
Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/

Reformatted excerpts from Tero Tilus''s message of
2009-12-19:
> The detect-missing-attachment hook is pretty self evident but what you
> had in mind for the dates?  Formatter for the thread-index-mode date
> widget maybe?
Exactly. We already have index-mode-size-widget, so
index-mode-date-widget would be analogous.
-- 
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>