On Sunday, May 4, 2008 9:02pm, Daniel Wagner <daniel at wagner-home.com>
said:
> Excerpts from yanghatespam''s message of Sun May 04 17:47:50 -0700
2008:
>> If sup''s thread-grouping is decent, then it would be neat/more
accurate
>> to extend sup somehow to instead use these groupings for the filtering.
>> I.e., if an incoming message is grouped with a thread in which I was
a
>> participant, then leave it marked unread; otherwise, mark it read.
>
> Well, sup already has a pretty nice (and similar) feature for killing
> entire threads. The ''&'' key will archive a thread
permanently; that is,
> if new mails arrive in that thread, they will automatically be archived.
> So, you can hit ''&'' once for each thread you
don''t want to read; the
> rest will reappear in you inbox as new mails arrive in them.
Which reminds me that, as of 0.5 release, the bug I reported about &-killed
threads reappearing is still present.
But, other than that, 0.5 is a treat.
Cheers,
Kendall