Hi all, Essentially I want to know: - How can I mark all marked/tagged mails/threads as read. - Can I tell sup, to not show any mail/thread in inbox, if mail has no inbox label. This is the way I operate Thunderbird and I wanted to keep my workflow same for both. Thanks and Regards, Manish
One more things is that when I press @ to refresh the inbox view, I see many other threads which do not have inbox label in it. Do I have to take any extra action on all those messages? I believe they are all unread messages? Is this the case? Thanks, Manish Manish Sapariya wrote:> Hi all, > Essentially I want to know: > - How can I mark all marked/tagged mails/threads as read. > - Can I tell sup, to not show any mail/thread in inbox, if mail has no inbox > label. > > This is the way I operate Thunderbird and I wanted to keep my workflow > same for both. > > Thanks and Regards, > Manish > > _______________________________________________ > sup-talk mailing list > sup-talk at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk > >
Excerpts from Manish Sapariya''s message of Mon Feb 04 03:34:51 -0600 2008:> - How can I mark all marked/tagged mails/threads as read.Tag threads with ''t'', press '';'' for apply, press ''N'' to toggle from unread to read. If you have a search that includes both read and unread threads, you can select only the unread threads by including "is:unread" in your query. You can use tag and apply with other commands too, like delete and label.> - Can I tell sup, to not show any mail/thread in inbox, if mail has no inbox > label.That''s what it does already. However, in the inbox view, the "inbox" label is not shown. It IS shown in other views, like the search results view. If you don''t want a thread to reappear in the inbox when a new message arrives, kill it with ''&'' instead of archiving it with ''a''. -- Christopher Warrington <chrisw at rice.edu> Jones College
Excerpts from Manish Sapariya''s message of Mon Feb 04 03:51:27 -0600 2008:> One more things is that when I press @ to refresh the inbox view, I > see many other threads which do not have inbox label in it. Do I have > to take any extra action on all those messages? I believe they are all > unread messages? Is this the case?This is a bug (I think) in recent version. Initially, these threads are not displayed because of sup''s 20 message result limit. Re-running the query with @ pulls in all threads. I could be wrong about the above: I''m not looking at the code right now. All the messages have the inbox label. As I said in my other message, you just don''t see it in the inbox view. Open the thread and you will see inbox in the list of labels. -- Christopher Warrington <chrisw at rice.edu> Jones College
Hi Chris, I have some comments inline. Christopher Warrington wrote:> Tag threads with ''t'', press '';'' for apply, press ''N'' to toggle from > unread to read. > > If you have a search that includes both read and unread threads, you can > select only the unread threads by including "is:unread" in your query. >is:unread is very good trick. Thanks.> You can use tag and apply with other commands too, like delete and label. >I am not sure if I am missing something here, but I could not delete labels from all tagged threads. I could remove label from single though.> If you don''t want a thread to reappear in the inbox when a new message > arrives, kill it with ''&'' instead of archiving it with ''a''. > >Just so that I understand it, kill will remove the thread from appearing from inbox, but in my search results it will show up? Thanks and Regards, Manish
Also, Is there anything using which I can load all messages? I have to do M to load all messages until it says no messages found. Thanks, Manish
On 4.2.2008, Manish Sapariya wrote:> Also, > Is there anything using which I can load all messages? I have to do > M to load all messages until it says no messages found.depending on the version of sup you are running, "!!" should do it. Hit ctrl-g to stop the operation (as getting all threads in some circumstances is going to hurt if you''ve got a large mailbox) Marcus
> If you don''t want a thread to reappear in the inbox when a new message > arrives, kill it with ''&'' instead of archiving it with ''a''. >I hope I not missing something obvious, but I am seeing messages killed again in my inbox. It does have killed label. By the way, thanks for all the help. I am now using sup for all my mail communication. It does crash once in a while, mostly when I do some quick operation of loading messages and opening them and most of the issues seems to be while accessing the index. Thanks and Regards, -Manish