Hi! I''m trying to install sup _without_ using gems, as I already have most of the dependencies through my package manager (aptitude), and I''m having lots of trouble. Since there is no way of telling gems that I already have the packages, sup won''t work because it''s trying to check the dependencies via gems on runtime and failing because gems thinks rake (for instance) is not installed. Is this a sup issue? Thanks, Alberto
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 23:07:14 -0300, Alberto Bertogli wrote:> >Hi! > >I''m trying to install sup _without_ using gems, as I already have most >of the dependencies through my package manager (aptitude), and I''m >having lots of trouble. > >Since there is no way of telling gems that I already have the packages, >sup won''t work because it''s trying to check the dependencies via gems on >runtime and failing because gems thinks rake (for instance) is not >installed. > >Is this a sup issue?No, I don''t think so. AFAIK this is a known issue with the gem system in combination with other packaging systems. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus?therning?org Jabber: magnus?therning?gmail?com http://therning.org/magnus -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20071012/0e90229f/attachment.bin
Excerpts from Alberto Bertogli''s message of Wed Oct 10 19:07:14 -0700 2007:> I''m trying to install sup _without_ using gems, as I already have most > of the dependencies through my package manager (aptitude), and I''m > having lots of trouble. > > Since there is no way of telling gems that I already have the > packages, sup won''t work because it''s trying to check the dependencies > via gems on runtime and failing because gems thinks rake (for > instance) is not installed.What if you remove the "require ''rubygems''" lines from bin/sup and lib/sup.rb? -- William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>