Saju Palayur <saju_pa at hotmail.com> writes:
> Hi
>
>
>
> When we run the profiler these 3 functions take more than 8500 cycles.
>
>
>
> split_cb_search_shape_sign_N1() 22782
> pitch_search_3tap() 19208
> lpc_to_lsp() 16007
>
> So can I configure these in a different way so it takes less cycles.
I am not familiar with the code, so I can't say. I was trying to teach
you how to optimize, not give you an optimization.
--Randy
> I do not need very high sound quality
>
> Thanks for your time
>
> Warm Regards
> Saju
>
> > From: yates at ieee.org
>> To: saju_pa at hotmail.com
>> CC: speex-dev at xiph.org
>> Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Speex on TI DSP 5505
>> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:55:55 -0400
>>
>> Saju Palayur <saju_pa at hotmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > We have ported the Narrow band 8 Khz Speex encoder and decoder on
to TI DSP 5505
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > To compress 20ms of 16 bit audio sampled at 8Khz it takes 4.2ms.
>> >
>> > Is there any optimizations I can do to make it run faster.
>>
>> The first thing to do would be to profile the code (I assume you're
>> using CCS) and see where the most time is being spent.
>>
>> --Randy
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks for yor time
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Saju
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Speex-dev mailing list
>> > Speex-dev at xiph.org
>> > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>>
>> --
>> Randy Yates % "She tells me that she likes me very much,
>> Digital Signal Labs % but when I try to touch, she makes it
>> mailto://yates at ieee.org % all too clear."
>> http://www.digitalsignallabs.com % 'Yours Truly, 2095', *Time*,
ELO
>
--
Randy Yates % "Ticket to the moon, flight leaves here
today
Digital Signal Labs % from Satellite 2"
mailto://yates at ieee.org % 'Ticket To The Moon'
http://www.digitalsignallabs.com % *Time*, Electric Light Orchestra